Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy Wambo Coal AEMR 2011-2012 - Peabody Energy
232, 6% 271, 7% Inflows (ML) Rainfall Runoff Tailings Water Bleed 0, 0% 175, 5% 281, 8% 154, 4% 319, 9% 2240, 61% Groundwater Inflows (Open Cuts) Groundwater Inflows (Underground) Recovery of Water supplied to Underground Hunter River Extractions Wollembi Brook Extractions United Bores The bulk of water inflows occurred from rainfall and runoff captured in the water management system (61%). In comparison with EIS predictions this would correspond to the bulk of the open cut dewatering (25.8%), the sediment control dams (11.5%) and a proportion of the tailings water recovery (43.5%). The EIS prediction for average licenced extraction of 2.6% compares with about 6% of inflows in 2011 – 2012. The recovery of water from the underground (8%) was less than the EIS prediction of 13%. The estimate water management system outflows over 2011-2012 are shown graphically on Figure below Outflows (ML) 360, 12% 0, 0% 621, 20% Dust Suppression CHPP Makeup Underground Supply Transfers To United Domestic Usage 2, 0% 0, 0% 743, 24% 384, 12% 999, 32% Evaporation HRSTS/MERF Releases Spill Appendix 2C: Water Balance Summary 2011-2012
Releases to the Hunter River via the HRSTS amounted to 12% of outflows. There were no reported spills from the water management system. There were no transfers to United Collieries and a negligible water use for potable supply. The bulk of outflows comprised water re-use in the CHPP (32%), evaporation losses (24%) and water used for dust suppression activities (20%). Appendix 2C: Water Balance Summary 2011-2012
- Page 103 and 104: 2011-2012 AEMR Riparian EFA Riparia
- Page 105 and 106: Appendix 1 Rail Haulage Records
- Page 107 and 108: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 109 and 110: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 111 and 112: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 113 and 114: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 115 and 116: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 117 and 118: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 119 and 120: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 121 and 122: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 R
- Page 123 and 124: Appendix 2A Meteorological Data
- Page 125 and 126: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 127 and 128: Appendix 2B Air Monitoring Data
- Page 129 and 130: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 D
- Page 131 and 132: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 133 and 134: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 135 and 136: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 W
- Page 137 and 138: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 D
- Page 139 and 140: Appendix 2C Surface Water Monitorin
- Page 141 and 142: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 143 and 144: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 145 and 146: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 147 and 148: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 149 and 150: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 151 and 152: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 153: Annual Environmental Management Rep
- Page 157 and 158: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011‐2012
- Page 159 and 160: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 M
- Page 161 and 162: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 P
- Page 163 and 164: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 G
- Page 165 and 166: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 M
- Page 167 and 168: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 M
- Page 169 and 170: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 G
- Page 171 and 172: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 P
- Page 173 and 174: Wambo Coal Pty Ltd AEMR 2011-2012 H
- Page 176 and 177: WAMBO HOMESTEAD 1 B L A S T V I B R
- Page 178 and 179: • individual wall panels — 20 H
- Page 180 and 181: 5 Figure 5: Setup for recording in
- Page 182 and 183: • spectrograms were constructed u
- Page 184 and 185: APPENDIX A Waveforms and spectrogra
- Page 186: East - west ground monitor (“tran
- Page 189 and 190: Channel 1: Channel 2: Channel 3:
- Page 191 and 192: Appendix 2F Noise Monitoring Result
- Page 193 and 194: Wambo Coal Mine Annual Report 2011/
- Page 195 and 196: Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION...
- Page 197 and 198: The survey purpose is to quantify a
- Page 199 and 200: 1.3 Terminology Some definitions of
- Page 201 and 202: 1.5 Wambo Coal Rail Spur Developmen
- Page 203 and 204: 2 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Assessment Method
232, 6% 271, 7%<br />
Inflows (ML)<br />
Rainfall Runoff<br />
Tailings Water Bleed<br />
0, 0%<br />
175, 5%<br />
281, 8%<br />
154, 4%<br />
319, 9%<br />
2240, 61%<br />
Groundwater Inflows (Open<br />
Cuts)<br />
Groundwater Inflows<br />
(Underground)<br />
Recovery of Water supplied to<br />
Underground<br />
Hunter River Extractions<br />
Wollembi Brook Extractions<br />
United Bores<br />
The bulk of water inflows occurred from rainfall and runoff captured in the water<br />
management system (61%). In comparison with EIS predictions this would correspond to<br />
the bulk of the open cut dewatering (25.8%), the sediment control dams (11.5%) and a<br />
proportion of the tailings water recovery (43.5%). The EIS prediction for average licenced<br />
extraction of 2.6% compares with about 6% of inflows in <strong>2011</strong> – <strong>2012</strong>. The recovery of<br />
water from the underground (8%) was less than the EIS prediction of 13%.<br />
The estimate water management system outflows over <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong> are shown graphically on<br />
Figure below<br />
Outflows (ML)<br />
360,<br />
12%<br />
0, 0%<br />
621, 20%<br />
Dust Suppression<br />
CHPP Makeup<br />
Underground Supply<br />
Transfers To United<br />
Domestic Usage<br />
2, 0%<br />
0, 0%<br />
743, 24%<br />
384,<br />
12%<br />
999, 32%<br />
Evaporation<br />
HRSTS/MERF Releases<br />
Spill<br />
Appendix 2C: Water Balance Summary <strong>2011</strong>-<strong>2012</strong>