31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Health</strong> care systems | B1<br />

for health care that is unnecessary or <strong>in</strong>appropriate; provid<strong>in</strong>g sub-optimal<br />

(cheaper) health care <strong>in</strong> order to maximize net <strong>in</strong>come; and provid<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>appropriate<br />

care <strong>in</strong> order to market a supposed difference from other providers<br />

(for example, advocat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>jections as better quality care when oral treatment<br />

or simple health advice would be better).<br />

Commercialization also affects the nature of health care itself. It encourages<br />

a commodification of health care and a bias towards biomedical and<br />

curative <strong>in</strong>terventions because it is easier to market and sell tangible health<br />

care products and services. Such commercialization benefits, and is therefore<br />

encouraged by, the medical profession, pharmaceutical companies and the<br />

Box B1.4 New Public Management<br />

New Public Management (NPM) is a term used to describe private sector<br />

solutions to public sector constra<strong>in</strong>ts. It is based on the idea that the monopoly<br />

power of government, and the lack of competition to government<br />

departments and civil servants that would otherwise compel them to be<br />

efficient and accountable to service users, are responsible for bureaucratic<br />

rigidity, corruption and <strong>in</strong>efficiency.<br />

One NPM solution is to <strong>in</strong>troduce competition between different public<br />

sector departments and ‘<strong>in</strong>ternal markets’ (purchaser-provider splits)<br />

with<strong>in</strong> the public sector. Another is to restrict the role of government from<br />

be<strong>in</strong>g a funder and supplier of services to that of a funder and contractor<br />

of services. Public sector bureaucracy would then shr<strong>in</strong>k as it moved<br />

away from public management via bureaucratic control to ‘management<br />

by contract’ of <strong>in</strong>dependent private sector providers, semi-<strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

parastatal agencies or local government bodies. In some <strong>in</strong>stances, public<br />

sector entities are ‘corporatized’ (granted a greater degree of autonomy)<br />

and expected to enter the provider market to compete for government<br />

contracts and tenders.<br />

The extent to which NPM has achieved its stated goals is contested<br />

(Stewart 1998, Evans 1997, Maynard 1998, Khalegian and Das Gupta 2004).<br />

Critics po<strong>in</strong>t to the high transaction costs associated with the management<br />

of <strong>in</strong>ternal markets; the use of <strong>in</strong>ternal markets as a stag<strong>in</strong>g post towards<br />

the eventual privatization of public services; the emphasis on competition<br />

over collaboration; and the emergence of an <strong>in</strong>appropriately excessive ‘target-driven’<br />

culture (see http://www.ghwatch.org/targetcultureNHS).<br />

66

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!