31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

were <strong>in</strong> debt primarily because of pay<strong>in</strong>g for health care (Ensor and Pham<br />

1996). Patients who borrow m<strong>one</strong>y to pay for treatment can end up pay<strong>in</strong>g<br />

extortionate <strong>in</strong>terest rates. To offset the cost of borrow<strong>in</strong>g, households may<br />

cut down on their food consumption, sell off precious assets such as land or<br />

cattle, or withdraw children (particularly girls) from school to save on school<br />

fees (Whitehead, Dahlgren and Evans 2001, Tipp<strong>in</strong>g 2000).<br />

It is argued that exemption schemes can protect the poor from user fees.<br />

But such schemes are rarely effective (Russell and Gilson 1997) and can encourage<br />

extortion and patronage when service providers are poorly remunerated.<br />

Neither is there any evidence that user fees prevent the ‘frivolous’ overuse of<br />

health services – for most people, cost barriers result <strong>in</strong> an under-use of health<br />

care services.<br />

Given the evidence that user fees are a major and widespread barrier to<br />

essential health care, as well as a cause of long-term impoverishment, it is<br />

paradoxical that the poorer a country, the more likely its people will face outof-pocket<br />

health care expenditure. In stark contrast, high-<strong>in</strong>come countries<br />

tend to have ‘socialized’ f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g systems based on general taxation, national<br />

health <strong>in</strong>surance or mandated social health <strong>in</strong>surance (Mack<strong>in</strong>tosh and Koivusalo<br />

2004).<br />

the segmentation of health care systems The ‘segmentation of<br />

health care systems’ refers to the phenomenon of separate health care systems<br />

for richer and poorer people, as opposed to <strong>one</strong> universal health care<br />

system for all. The World Bank <strong>in</strong> particular has advocated that governments<br />

<strong>in</strong> poorer countries should focus their scarce public resources on provid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

a free ‘basic’ or ‘m<strong>in</strong>imum’ package of preventative and curative services for<br />

the poor, while withdraw<strong>in</strong>g from the direct provision of other services. By<br />

encourag<strong>in</strong>g the relatively rich sections of society to use the private sector,<br />

it argues that the public sector will be able to redirect its resources to those<br />

most <strong>in</strong> need (IFC 2002, Gwatk<strong>in</strong> 2003). In some middle- and high-<strong>in</strong>come<br />

countries, tax breaks on private <strong>in</strong>surance are used to entice higher-<strong>in</strong>come<br />

groups away from publicly provided services. <strong>Health</strong> care systems <strong>in</strong> some<br />

countries are be<strong>in</strong>g segmented even further by the processes of globalization<br />

– <strong>in</strong> India, Mexico and South Africa private providers cater to foreign ‘medical<br />

tourists’ from high-<strong>in</strong>come countries or from high-<strong>in</strong>come groups <strong>in</strong> low- and<br />

middle-<strong>in</strong>come countries.<br />

The assumption beh<strong>in</strong>d these policies is that it is more efficient and equitable<br />

to segment health care accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>come level – a public sector focused<br />

on the poor and a private system for the rich that allows the public sector to<br />

Approaches to health care<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!