Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Health care systems | B1 user charges that arose from the ‘passive privatization’ of health care and the increase in informal, under-the-counter charges in the public sector. The impact of this transfer of responsibility for health care financing onto households has been disastrous, particularly for the poor. It has deterred people from accessing health care and resulted in untreated sickness and avoidable death (Whitehead, Dahlgren and Evans 2001, Theodore 1999, World Bank 1999, Yu, Cao and Lucas 1997 and Fu 1999). User fees have also discouraged people from taking full doses of their medication; evidence is emerging that they undermine adherence to anti-retroviral treatment and increase the risk of drug resistance (WHO 2004). Even when health care is nominally free, financial barriers may still put health care beyond the reach of many families. Maternity services in Bangladesh, for instance, are free but in practice are accompanied by hidden and unofficial payments; for more than one fifth of families, these payments are the equivalent of 50–100% of their monthly income (Nahar and Costello 1998). User fees also generate poverty, or deepen the poverty of those who are already poor. In rural North Vietnam, an estimated one fifth of poor households Box B1.3 Public and private health care financing Private financing takes many forms. Private health insurance is often paid by individuals, but some private sector employers contribute to their employees’ private health insurance. In some places, households contribute to a community-financing scheme, which pools funds that are managed on behalf of all members of the scheme. User charges refer to out-of-pocket payments that service users make directly to providers. Medical savings accounts are promoted as a mechanism for households to build up a reserve of money to enable them to meet the cost of user fees in the future. Public financing is generally based on general tax revenue or national health insurance. In developing countries, external grants and aid from donors can constitute anything between 20% and 80% of total public sector health care spending. Public and private sources of financing often co-exist – for example, community-financing schemes may complement public funds used to pay the salaries of some health workers, while private medical insurance may receive tax breaks that amount in practice to a public subsidy. 62
were in debt primarily because of paying for health care (Ensor and Pham 1996). Patients who borrow money to pay for treatment can end up paying extortionate interest rates. To offset the cost of borrowing, households may cut down on their food consumption, sell off precious assets such as land or cattle, or withdraw children (particularly girls) from school to save on school fees (Whitehead, Dahlgren and Evans 2001, Tipping 2000). It is argued that exemption schemes can protect the poor from user fees. But such schemes are rarely effective (Russell and Gilson 1997) and can encourage extortion and patronage when service providers are poorly remunerated. Neither is there any evidence that user fees prevent the ‘frivolous’ overuse of health services – for most people, cost barriers result in an under-use of health care services. Given the evidence that user fees are a major and widespread barrier to essential health care, as well as a cause of long-term impoverishment, it is paradoxical that the poorer a country, the more likely its people will face outof-pocket health care expenditure. In stark contrast, high-income countries tend to have ‘socialized’ financing systems based on general taxation, national health insurance or mandated social health insurance (Mackintosh and Koivusalo 2004). the segmentation of health care systems The ‘segmentation of health care systems’ refers to the phenomenon of separate health care systems for richer and poorer people, as opposed to one universal health care system for all. The World Bank in particular has advocated that governments in poorer countries should focus their scarce public resources on providing a free ‘basic’ or ‘minimum’ package of preventative and curative services for the poor, while withdrawing from the direct provision of other services. By encouraging the relatively rich sections of society to use the private sector, it argues that the public sector will be able to redirect its resources to those most in need (IFC 2002, Gwatkin 2003). In some middle- and high-income countries, tax breaks on private insurance are used to entice higher-income groups away from publicly provided services. Health care systems in some countries are being segmented even further by the processes of globalization – in India, Mexico and South Africa private providers cater to foreign ‘medical tourists’ from high-income countries or from high-income groups in low- and middle-income countries. The assumption behind these policies is that it is more efficient and equitable to segment health care according to income level – a public sector focused on the poor and a private system for the rich that allows the public sector to Approaches to health care 63
- Page 30 and 31: Health and globalization | A1 and h
- Page 32 and 33: Health and globalization | A1 in 20
- Page 34 and 35: Health and globalization | A1 is gl
- Page 36 and 37: Health and globalization | A1 peopl
- Page 38 and 39: Health and globalization | A1 numbe
- Page 40 and 41: Health and globalization | A1 and p
- Page 42 and 43: Health and globalization | A1 econo
- Page 44 and 45: Health and globalization | A1 Box A
- Page 46 and 47: Health and globalization | A1 half
- Page 48 and 49: Health and globalization | A1 appro
- Page 50 and 51: table a1 Key health concerns with W
- Page 52 and 53: Health and globalization | A1 Healt
- Page 54 and 55: Health and globalization | A1 merci
- Page 56 and 57: Health and globalization | A1 thems
- Page 58 and 59: Health and globalization | A1 Even
- Page 60 and 61: Health and globalization | A1 • A
- Page 62 and 63: Health and globalization | A1 non-v
- Page 64 and 65: Health and globalization | A1 27-28
- Page 66 and 67: Health and globalization | A1 Jenki
- Page 68 and 69: Health and globalization | A1 Satte
- Page 70 and 71: Health and globalization | A1 WHO (
- Page 72 and 73: and regulatory authorities mandated
- Page 74 and 75: Health care systems | B1 4) selecti
- Page 76 and 77: Health care systems | B1 • And si
- Page 78 and 79: Health care systems | B1 • declin
- Page 82 and 83: Health care systems | B1 focus on t
- Page 84 and 85: Health care systems | B1 for health
- Page 86 and 87: Health care systems | B1 their cont
- Page 88 and 89: Health care systems | B1 health car
- Page 90 and 91: Health care systems | B1 ing servic
- Page 92 and 93: Health care systems | B1 Box B1.7 G
- Page 94 and 95: Health care systems | B1 many of th
- Page 96 and 97: Health care systems | B1 the lack o
- Page 98 and 99: Macro-economic factors Impoverished
- Page 100 and 101: Health care systems | B1 HALE 2000
- Page 102 and 103: Health care systems | B1 But improv
- Page 104 and 105: Health care systems | B1 high-incom
- Page 106 and 107: Health care systems | B1 Structural
- Page 108 and 109: Health care systems | B1 the high t
- Page 110 and 111: Health care systems | B1 and histor
- Page 112 and 113: Health care systems | B1 norms (Loe
- Page 114 and 115: Health care systems | B1 Foster M,
- Page 116 and 117: Health care systems | B1 Toole M et
- Page 118 and 119: B2 | Medicines Introduction Essenti
- Page 120 and 121: Health care systems | B2 of new med
- Page 122 and 123: Health care systems | B2 chapter re
- Page 124 and 125: Health care systems | B2 the fourth
- Page 126 and 127: Health care systems | B2 agenda thr
- Page 128 and 129: Health care systems | B2 nonetheles
<strong>Health</strong> care systems | B1<br />
user charges that arose from the ‘passive privatization’ of health care and the<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>formal, under-the-counter charges <strong>in</strong> the public sector.<br />
The impact of this transfer of responsibility for health care f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g onto<br />
households has been disastrous, particularly for the poor. It has deterred<br />
people from access<strong>in</strong>g health care and resulted <strong>in</strong> untreated sickness and<br />
avoidable death (Whitehead, Dahlgren and Evans 2001, Theodore 1999, World<br />
Bank 1999, Yu, Cao and Lucas 1997 and Fu 1999). User fees have also discouraged<br />
people from tak<strong>in</strong>g full doses of their medication; evidence is emerg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that they underm<strong>in</strong>e adherence to anti-retroviral treatment and <strong>in</strong>crease the<br />
risk of drug resistance (WHO 2004). Even when health care is nom<strong>in</strong>ally free,<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial barriers may still put health care beyond the reach of many families.<br />
Maternity services <strong>in</strong> Bangladesh, for <strong>in</strong>stance, are free but <strong>in</strong> practice are<br />
accompanied by hidden and unofficial payments; for more than <strong>one</strong> fifth of<br />
families, these payments are the equivalent of 50–100% of their monthly <strong>in</strong>come<br />
(Nahar and Costello 1998).<br />
User fees also generate poverty, or deepen the poverty of those who are already<br />
poor. In rural North Vietnam, an estimated <strong>one</strong> fifth of poor households<br />
Box B1.3 Public and private health care f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Private f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g takes many forms. Private health <strong>in</strong>surance is often paid<br />
by <strong>in</strong>dividuals, but some private sector employers contribute to their employees’<br />
private health <strong>in</strong>surance. In some places, households contribute<br />
to a community-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g scheme, which pools funds that are managed on<br />
behalf of all members of the scheme. User charges refer to out-of-pocket<br />
payments that service users make directly to providers. Medical sav<strong>in</strong>gs accounts<br />
are promoted as a mechanism for households to build up a reserve<br />
of m<strong>one</strong>y to enable them to meet the cost of user fees <strong>in</strong> the future.<br />
Public f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g is generally based on general tax revenue or national<br />
health <strong>in</strong>surance. In develop<strong>in</strong>g countries, external grants and aid from<br />
donors can constitute anyth<strong>in</strong>g between 20% and 80% of total public sector<br />
health care spend<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
Public and private sources of f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g often co-exist – for example,<br />
community-f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g schemes may complement public funds used to pay<br />
the salaries of some health workers, while private medical <strong>in</strong>surance may<br />
receive tax breaks that amount <strong>in</strong> practice to a public subsidy.<br />
62