Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Holding to account | E7 Box E7.1 Essential national health research and national health research systems The core of an essential national health research (ENHR) strategy is to promote research on country-specific problems that could underpin national and community decisions on health policy and management. It involves researchers, decision-makers and community representatives, who jointly choose the priorities to be addressed. It is aimed at improving the effective use of existing knowledge and technologies. Country-specific research may have limited transferability to other countries or situations, but it guides the wise use of internal resources and strengthens national sovereignty. It places a country in a much stronger position to judge and, if necessary, seek adjustments to external development assistance. Furthermore, it gives each developing country an informed voice in establishing priorities for research on the global scientific agenda (Commission on Health Research for Development 1990). For health research to be more effectively aligned to meeting national health priorities, a health research system is needed to plan, coordinate, monitor and manage health research resources and activities. Health research systems exist to plan, coordinate, monitor and manage health research resources and activities in a way that promotes effective and equitable national health development. It is a concept that ‘integrates and coordinates the objectives, structures, stakeholders, processes, cultures and outcomes of health research towards the development of equity in health and in the national health system’ (WHO 2002). The concept has been delineated in terms of several components of a system including stewardship; financing; values and ethics; roles and functions; capacity and resources; and strategies for strengthening health research systems. • all countries should undertake essential national health research (ENHR) (Box E7.1); • international partnerships to address priority health research questions should be strengthened; • funding for research focused on the health problems of the South should be increased and sustained; • an international mechanism to monitor progress should be established. 340
Developing national health research capacity Although some progress has been made with implementing the ENHR strategy (Neufeld and Johnson 2001), consultations with various international and national stakeholders leading up to the 2000 Bangkok Conference (International Organizing Committee 2001) revealed several limitations: • health research was still not sufficiently valued by national leaderships as an investment in development. • research systems in general, and health research systems in particular, were often poorly organized and managed. • many countries lacked a critical mass of researchers, a lack that was often part of a wider problem of inadequate human capacity. • skills development was mainly focused on the ‘supply side’ (researchers and research institutions) rather than enhancing the capacity of ‘users’ of research (e.g. policy-makers and community groups). • research has not often been translated into policy or action. In evaluating efforts made to implement the recommendations of the Commission on Health Research for Development, the Bangkok Conference also concluded that: • a much stronger Southern voice was needed to counter the dominance of Northern institutions over global health research. • research needed to shift from knowledge generation to knowledge management. • countries, as units of policy, financing and governance, are key to having an impact on health and development through health research – this led to the concept of a ‘national health research system’, developed further by WHO and other partners (Box E7.1) • a more unified and inclusive approach was needed to increase synergy and reduce fragmentation. Four years later, the 2004 Mexico Ministerial Summit on Health Research addressed some of the shortfalls identified at Bangkok and ensured that a high-level ministerial discussion on health research took place for the first time. A major theme of the discussion was the need to bridge the gap between what is known about how to improve health and what is actually done to change policy and practice – the ‘know-do’ gap. The Mexico Summit also emphasized better communication, information-sharing and knowledge dissemination as a means of improving national health research capacity, especially in developing countries. One important Essential health research 341
- Page 307 and 308: Recommendations WHO’s core purpos
- Page 309 and 310: doctors, and more people with exper
- Page 311 and 312: E2 | UNICEF In 2005, Carol Bellamy,
- Page 313 and 314: In sum, for almost a decade, childr
- Page 315 and 316: prompted a global debate on how to
- Page 317 and 318: E3 | The World Bank and the Interna
- Page 319 and 320: 22 World Bank: the centre of world
- Page 321 and 322: approach to conditionality is being
- Page 323 and 324: tal policies should explicitly refe
- Page 325 and 326: E4 | Big business This chapter deal
- Page 327 and 328: 23 The Marlboro Man was described b
- Page 329 and 330: dedicated funding [Articles 5.6 and
- Page 331 and 332: grass roots in building government
- Page 333 and 334: 24 A pack of Cerelac cereal food pu
- Page 335 and 336: USAID has also funded work on breas
- Page 337 and 338: (from whatever its source, and howe
- Page 339 and 340: These trends in taxation are underp
- Page 341 and 342: Norway Denmark Netherlands Luxembou
- Page 343 and 344: Global aid trends - allocation Wher
- Page 345 and 346: weapons, vehicles and military trai
- Page 347 and 348: table e5.1 Value (in £) of new DFI
- Page 349 and 350: OECD (2005). Development Co-operati
- Page 351 and 352: 25 Breaking the chains of debt: pro
- Page 353 and 354: Box E6.1 Zambia: inflation or death
- Page 355 and 356: have met the Fund’s conditions, a
- Page 357: E7 | Essential health research Rese
- Page 361 and 362: for African Medical Editors (Certai
- Page 363 and 364: Neither the consultations leading u
- Page 365 and 366: Box E7.4 Asking the social-politica
- Page 367 and 368: • global architecture for health
- Page 369 and 370: part f | Conclusions Global Health
- Page 371 and 372: current debt relief mechanism - the
- Page 373 and 374: agreement, and taking health and he
- Page 375 and 376: ity of the now-developed countries
- Page 377 and 378: tion and water are experiencing sim
Hold<strong>in</strong>g to account | E7<br />
Box E7.1 Essential national health research and national<br />
health research systems<br />
The core of an essential national health research (ENHR) strategy is to promote<br />
research on country-specific problems that could underp<strong>in</strong> national<br />
and community decisions on health policy and management. It <strong>in</strong>volves<br />
researchers, decision-makers and community representatives, who jo<strong>in</strong>tly<br />
choose the priorities to be addressed. It is aimed at improv<strong>in</strong>g the effective<br />
use of exist<strong>in</strong>g knowledge and technologies. Country-specific research may<br />
have limited transferability to other countries or situations, but it guides<br />
the wise use of <strong>in</strong>ternal resources and strengthens national sovereignty.<br />
It places a country <strong>in</strong> a much stronger position to judge and, if necessary,<br />
seek adjustments to external development assistance. Furthermore, it gives<br />
each develop<strong>in</strong>g country an <strong>in</strong>formed voice <strong>in</strong> establish<strong>in</strong>g priorities for<br />
research on the global scientific agenda (Commission on <strong>Health</strong> Research<br />
for Development 1990).<br />
For health research to be more effectively aligned to meet<strong>in</strong>g national<br />
health priorities, a health research system is needed to plan, coord<strong>in</strong>ate,<br />
monitor and manage health research resources and activities.<br />
<strong>Health</strong> research systems exist to plan, coord<strong>in</strong>ate, monitor and manage<br />
health research resources and activities <strong>in</strong> a way that promotes effective and<br />
equitable national health development. It is a concept that ‘<strong>in</strong>tegrates and<br />
coord<strong>in</strong>ates the objectives, structures, stakeholders, processes, cultures<br />
and outcomes of health research towards the development of equity <strong>in</strong><br />
health and <strong>in</strong> the national health system’ (WHO 2002). The concept has<br />
been del<strong>in</strong>eated <strong>in</strong> terms of several comp<strong>one</strong>nts of a system <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stewardship; f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g; values and ethics; roles and functions; capacity and<br />
resources; and strategies for strengthen<strong>in</strong>g health research systems.<br />
• all countries should undertake essential national health research (ENHR)<br />
(Box E7.1);<br />
• <strong>in</strong>ternational partnerships to address priority health research questions<br />
should be strengthened;<br />
• fund<strong>in</strong>g for research focused on the health problems of the South should<br />
be <strong>in</strong>creased and susta<strong>in</strong>ed;<br />
• an <strong>in</strong>ternational mechanism to monitor progress should be established.<br />
340