Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file
E6 | Debt relief ‘Since 2000, the developing world has been a net exporter of capital to the advanced economies’ – World Bank 2004. ‘The largest international flow of fixed-income debt today takes the form of borrowing by the world’s richest nations at (probably) negative real interest rates from countries with very large numbers of poor’ – Larry Summers, Harvard University, 2004. The global economy today appears to be approaching a ‘tipping point’ – a point at which the vast imbalances that characterize the international financial system may well tip over into recession, or even worse into a period of debtdeflation not unlike that faced by Japan in 1990. These imbalances, and in particular rich country debts, eclipse the debts of poor countries. The instability caused by these huge debts and other imbalances is partly a result of the lack of G7 coordination and cooperation in the management of trade, exchange rate volatility, rising levels of debt and climate change. This failure is leading to global political tensions, a collapse of multilateralism, and growing calls for higher subsidies and protection from unfair competition. It is exacerbated by the decision of the US central bank and government to do nothing to arrest the decline in the value of the dollar, which has depreciated by 30% since 2002, increasing trade tensions and causing the Japanese central bank to borrow massively to manage the dollar/yen relationship (in effect Japanese central bankers are managing trading relationships). It is one of the factors, along with falling supplies and rising demand, that provoked oil producers to raise prices, further exacerbating existing imbalances. Another major cause of global instability is the historically unprecedented foreign deficit built up by the US, the most indebted nation on earth. The net foreign indebtedness of the US is in excess of US$ 3 trillion, compared with US$ 176 billion owed by 42 heavily indebted poor countries. The US trade deficit – just one part of its net foreign indebtedness – soared to yet another record in 2004, reaching 5.3% of GDP, or US$ 617.7 billion – US$ 121.2 billion higher than in 2003. It was driven by an extraordinary rise in imports, which grew by 16.3% in 2004. Exports also grew at a healthy 12.3%. The US deficit arises from a consumption boom largely financed by low- 332
25 Breaking the chains of debt: protestors at Sikh temple, Birmingham, UK. income countries. As the World Bank notes (2004), ‘financing the US current account deficit has been shouldered by official institutions in developing countries that have invested reserves accumulated through good trade performance, effective exchange-rate management, and the strengthening in capital flows. Inflows of foreign official assets to the US amounted to US$ 208 billion during 2003, compared with US$ 95 billion for 2002, financing almost 40% of the US current account deficit’ (our italics). Neoliberal economists assure us that in a deregulated world capital flows from where it is plentiful to where it is scarce – but the reverse is happening today. Capital is being sucked out of low-income countries with large numbers of poor people, and moved to high-income countries with large numbers of the very rich. The injustice of transfers from the poor to the rich through debt repayments, unfair terms of trade and excessive consumption of natural resources has been widely explored in development literature. However, insufficient attention has been paid to financial transfers that enable rich countries to live off poor countries. The poor finance the rich The structural changes central to globalization that have created this situation occurred in 1971, when President Nixon unilaterally broke up the Debt relief 333
- Page 299 and 300: in favour of so-called ‘vertical
- Page 301 and 302: to speak openly, while bullying and
- Page 303 and 304: velop a unified, purposeful health
- Page 305 and 306: to medicines, and the mobilizing ro
- Page 307 and 308: Recommendations WHO’s core purpos
- Page 309 and 310: doctors, and more people with exper
- Page 311 and 312: E2 | UNICEF In 2005, Carol Bellamy,
- Page 313 and 314: In sum, for almost a decade, childr
- Page 315 and 316: prompted a global debate on how to
- Page 317 and 318: E3 | The World Bank and the Interna
- Page 319 and 320: 22 World Bank: the centre of world
- Page 321 and 322: approach to conditionality is being
- Page 323 and 324: tal policies should explicitly refe
- Page 325 and 326: E4 | Big business This chapter deal
- Page 327 and 328: 23 The Marlboro Man was described b
- Page 329 and 330: dedicated funding [Articles 5.6 and
- Page 331 and 332: grass roots in building government
- Page 333 and 334: 24 A pack of Cerelac cereal food pu
- Page 335 and 336: USAID has also funded work on breas
- Page 337 and 338: (from whatever its source, and howe
- Page 339 and 340: These trends in taxation are underp
- Page 341 and 342: Norway Denmark Netherlands Luxembou
- Page 343 and 344: Global aid trends - allocation Wher
- Page 345 and 346: weapons, vehicles and military trai
- Page 347 and 348: table e5.1 Value (in £) of new DFI
- Page 349: OECD (2005). Development Co-operati
- Page 353 and 354: Box E6.1 Zambia: inflation or death
- Page 355 and 356: have met the Fund’s conditions, a
- Page 357 and 358: E7 | Essential health research Rese
- Page 359 and 360: Developing national health research
- Page 361 and 362: for African Medical Editors (Certai
- Page 363 and 364: Neither the consultations leading u
- Page 365 and 366: Box E7.4 Asking the social-politica
- Page 367 and 368: • global architecture for health
- Page 369 and 370: part f | Conclusions Global Health
- Page 371 and 372: current debt relief mechanism - the
- Page 373 and 374: agreement, and taking health and he
- Page 375 and 376: ity of the now-developed countries
- Page 377 and 378: tion and water are experiencing sim
E6 | Debt relief<br />
‘S<strong>in</strong>ce 2000, the develop<strong>in</strong>g world has been a net exporter of capital to the advanced<br />
economies’ – World Bank 2004.<br />
‘The largest <strong>in</strong>ternational flow of fixed-<strong>in</strong>come debt today takes the form of<br />
borrow<strong>in</strong>g by the world’s richest nations at (probably) negative real <strong>in</strong>terest<br />
rates from countries with very large numbers of poor’ – Larry Summers,<br />
Harvard University, 2004.<br />
The global economy today appears to be approach<strong>in</strong>g a ‘tipp<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t’ – a<br />
po<strong>in</strong>t at which the vast imbalances that characterize the <strong>in</strong>ternational f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
system may well tip over <strong>in</strong>to recession, or even worse <strong>in</strong>to a period of debtdeflation<br />
not unlike that faced by Japan <strong>in</strong> 1990. These imbalances, and <strong>in</strong><br />
particular rich country debts, eclipse the debts of poor countries.<br />
The <strong>in</strong>stability caused by these huge debts and other imbalances is partly<br />
a result of the lack of G7 coord<strong>in</strong>ation and cooperation <strong>in</strong> the management of<br />
trade, exchange rate volatility, ris<strong>in</strong>g levels of debt and climate change. This<br />
failure is lead<strong>in</strong>g to global political tensions, a collapse of multilateralism, and<br />
grow<strong>in</strong>g calls for higher subsidies and protection from unfair competition. It<br />
is exacerbated by the decision of the US central bank and government to do<br />
noth<strong>in</strong>g to arrest the decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the value of the dollar, which has depreciated<br />
by 30% s<strong>in</strong>ce 2002, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g trade tensions and caus<strong>in</strong>g the Japanese central<br />
bank to borrow massively to manage the dollar/yen relationship (<strong>in</strong> effect<br />
Japanese central bankers are manag<strong>in</strong>g trad<strong>in</strong>g relationships). It is <strong>one</strong> of the<br />
factors, along with fall<strong>in</strong>g supplies and ris<strong>in</strong>g demand, that provoked oil producers<br />
to raise prices, further exacerbat<strong>in</strong>g exist<strong>in</strong>g imbalances.<br />
Another major cause of global <strong>in</strong>stability is the historically unprecedented<br />
foreign deficit built up by the US, the most <strong>in</strong>debted nation on earth. The net<br />
foreign <strong>in</strong>debtedness of the US is <strong>in</strong> excess of US$ 3 trillion, compared with US$<br />
176 billion owed by 42 heavily <strong>in</strong>debted poor countries. The US trade deficit<br />
– just <strong>one</strong> part of its net foreign <strong>in</strong>debtedness – soared to yet another record<br />
<strong>in</strong> 2004, reach<strong>in</strong>g 5.3% of GDP, or US$ 617.7 billion – US$ 121.2 billion higher<br />
than <strong>in</strong> 2003. It was driven by an extraord<strong>in</strong>ary rise <strong>in</strong> imports, which grew by<br />
16.3% <strong>in</strong> 2004. Exports also grew at a healthy 12.3%.<br />
The US deficit arises from a consumption boom largely f<strong>in</strong>anced by low-<br />
332