Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file
E5 | Aid Official development assistance (otherwise known as aid or ODA) consists of grants, loans and technical cooperation from governments and international bodies, with the objectives of promoting economic development and welfare (OECD 2005). Much aid is channelled through bilateral agreements between donor and recipient governments, some to multilateral agencies such as WHO and the World Bank, and much of the rest to NGOs and independent organizations such as the Global Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria. This chapter describes three key aspects of aid: its volume and distribution and its use in support of the political agendas of rich countries, most notably the ‘war on terror’ and privatization. Many other debates about aid are not discussed here, such as the effects of aid on political institutions in developing countries (Wangwe 2004). Some are raised elsewhere in this report, including the coordination of donors and the fragmenting impact of aid on health systems (part B, chapter 1); inappropriate conditions placed on recipient countries by donors; and the effects of aid on economic growth in poor countries. Global aid trends – volume From 1960 there was a steady rise in volume aid peaking in 1992, the year of the Earth Summit, when donors pledged further modest increases. In fact aid 70 60 50 $ billion 40 30 20 10 0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 Figure E5.1 The long-term trend in ODA from DAC donors – in $ billions real terms (2001 prices) (Source: Randel et al. 2004) 322
Norway Denmark Netherlands Luxembourg Sweden Belgium France Ireland Switzerland Finland United Kingdom Germany Canada Australia Spain New Zealand Greece Portugal Japan Austria Italy United States 0.41 0.41 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.28 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.21 0.2 0.2 0.16 0.14 0.61 0.7 0.7% GNI target 0.92 0.84 0.81 0.8 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 % of GNI Figure E5.2 Provisional figures for ODA as a percentage of GNI from DAC donors in 2003 then fell by 24% in real terms between 1992 and 1997 (Figure E5.1). The last few years have seen a reversal in the decline, but the increases fall far short of the additional US$ 50 billion a year needed to reach the Millennium Development Goals. Only five rich countries (Norway, Denmark, the Netherlands, Luxembourg and Sweden) met the UN aid target of 0.7% GNI in 2003 (see Figure E5.2). Meanwhile the Bush administration has requested more than US$ 565 billion from Congress for military purposes and its ‘war on terror’ (Randel et al. 2004). (These figures and those in the next section were provided by Judith Randel and Tony German of Development Initiatives, based on research on OECD Donor Assistance Committee statistics.) The volume of aid in 2003 was 3.9% more than in 2002 in real terms. This follows a 7.2% real terms increase in 2001–2. Provisional figures suggest that the total from donor countries rose from US$ 58.3 billion in 2002 to US$ 68.5 billion in 2003. Substantial increases from some of the largest (G8) donors – the US (up by 17%), the UK (12%) and France (10%) – outweighed big falls in aid from Japan (down 9%) and Italy (17%). In terms of actual amounts the US contributes most, followed by Japan, France, Germany and the UK; but Aid 323
- Page 289 and 290: The sources consulted worldwide in
- Page 291 and 292: Box E1.1 Milestones in WHO history
- Page 293 and 294: aised by his attempts to revitalize
- Page 295 and 296: • stronger internal focus on perf
- Page 297 and 298: 21 WHO - up in the clouds? Reaction
- Page 299 and 300: in favour of so-called ‘vertical
- Page 301 and 302: to speak openly, while bullying and
- Page 303 and 304: velop a unified, purposeful health
- Page 305 and 306: to medicines, and the mobilizing ro
- Page 307 and 308: Recommendations WHO’s core purpos
- Page 309 and 310: doctors, and more people with exper
- Page 311 and 312: E2 | UNICEF In 2005, Carol Bellamy,
- Page 313 and 314: In sum, for almost a decade, childr
- Page 315 and 316: prompted a global debate on how to
- Page 317 and 318: E3 | The World Bank and the Interna
- Page 319 and 320: 22 World Bank: the centre of world
- Page 321 and 322: approach to conditionality is being
- Page 323 and 324: tal policies should explicitly refe
- Page 325 and 326: E4 | Big business This chapter deal
- Page 327 and 328: 23 The Marlboro Man was described b
- Page 329 and 330: dedicated funding [Articles 5.6 and
- Page 331 and 332: grass roots in building government
- Page 333 and 334: 24 A pack of Cerelac cereal food pu
- Page 335 and 336: USAID has also funded work on breas
- Page 337 and 338: (from whatever its source, and howe
- Page 339: These trends in taxation are underp
- Page 343 and 344: Global aid trends - allocation Wher
- Page 345 and 346: weapons, vehicles and military trai
- Page 347 and 348: table e5.1 Value (in £) of new DFI
- Page 349 and 350: OECD (2005). Development Co-operati
- Page 351 and 352: 25 Breaking the chains of debt: pro
- Page 353 and 354: Box E6.1 Zambia: inflation or death
- Page 355 and 356: have met the Fund’s conditions, a
- Page 357 and 358: E7 | Essential health research Rese
- Page 359 and 360: Developing national health research
- Page 361 and 362: for African Medical Editors (Certai
- Page 363 and 364: Neither the consultations leading u
- Page 365 and 366: Box E7.4 Asking the social-politica
- Page 367 and 368: • global architecture for health
- Page 369 and 370: part f | Conclusions Global Health
- Page 371 and 372: current debt relief mechanism - the
- Page 373 and 374: agreement, and taking health and he
- Page 375 and 376: ity of the now-developed countries
- Page 377 and 378: tion and water are experiencing sim
E5 | Aid<br />
Official development assistance (otherwise known as aid or ODA) consists of<br />
grants, loans and technical cooperation from governments and <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />
bodies, with the objectives of promot<strong>in</strong>g economic development and welfare<br />
(OECD 2005). Much aid is channelled through bilateral agreements between<br />
donor and recipient governments, some to multilateral agencies such as WHO<br />
and the World Bank, and much of the rest to NGOs and <strong>in</strong>dependent organizations<br />
such as the <strong>Global</strong> Fund to fight AIDS, TB and Malaria.<br />
This chapter describes three key aspects of aid: its volume and distribution<br />
and its use <strong>in</strong> support of the political agendas of rich countries, most notably<br />
the ‘war on terror’ and privatization. Many other debates about aid are not<br />
discussed here, such as the effects of aid on political <strong>in</strong>stitutions <strong>in</strong> develop<strong>in</strong>g<br />
countries (Wangwe 2004). Some are raised elsewhere <strong>in</strong> this report, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
the coord<strong>in</strong>ation of donors and the fragment<strong>in</strong>g impact of aid on health<br />
systems (part B, chapter 1); <strong>in</strong>appropriate conditions placed on recipient countries<br />
by donors; and the effects of aid on economic growth <strong>in</strong> poor countries.<br />
<strong>Global</strong> aid trends – volume<br />
From 1960 there was a steady rise <strong>in</strong> volume aid peak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 1992, the year of<br />
the Earth Summit, when donors pledged further modest <strong>in</strong>creases. In fact aid<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
$ billion<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000<br />
Figure E5.1 The long-term trend <strong>in</strong> ODA from DAC donors – <strong>in</strong> $ billions real<br />
terms (2001 prices) (Source: Randel et al. 2004)<br />
322