31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Hold<strong>in</strong>g to account | E1<br />

open selection criteria that reflect the roles' leadership and management<br />

requirements.<br />

• There should be a strategic assessment of where WHO should be <strong>in</strong>fluential<br />

<strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>terests of health <strong>in</strong> relation to other multilateral bodies, and the<br />

exist<strong>in</strong>g liaison mechanisms between WHO and the <strong>in</strong>ternational trade and<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions.<br />

Fund<strong>in</strong>g and programm<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Donors should strive to <strong>in</strong>crease their overall donations towards an agreed<br />

target.<br />

• Donors should shift a proportion of their fund<strong>in</strong>g of extrabudgetary programmes<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the regular budget. The aim should be a roughly equal apportion<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of fund<strong>in</strong>g between the two arms of the budget, without any<br />

correspond<strong>in</strong>g decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> the total budget.<br />

• WHO should work on fewer priorities and ask donors to match their resources<br />

to them, to shift the balance between staff costs and activities and<br />

avoid ‘project-chas<strong>in</strong>g’; these priorities should be followed through <strong>in</strong> collaborative<br />

agreements with member states.<br />

• Programmes (and the organization's structure) should be organized around<br />

the Primary <strong>Health</strong> Care Approach, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the strengthen<strong>in</strong>g of systems-oriented<br />

units and divisions.<br />

• Extrabudgetary donations should follow agreed overall priorities – donors<br />

should avoid ty<strong>in</strong>g them too tightly to specific programmes and outputs.<br />

• Explicit resource allocation formulae should be developed to encourage<br />

better balances between core/extrabudgetary and staff/programme costs.<br />

• The benefits, risks and costs of global public-private partnerships <strong>in</strong> health<br />

should be openly debated and compared to alternatives.<br />

• WHO should develop strong safeguards aga<strong>in</strong>st conflicts of <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> fund<strong>in</strong>g,<br />

priority-sett<strong>in</strong>g and partnerships.<br />

Leadership and management Actions that WHO leaders can take to change<br />

the culture and improve their management and leadership:<br />

• Revisit WHO’s mission with all staff to renew their collective ownership and<br />

commitment: clarify priorities, agree comparative advantages, and from<br />

that develop a strategy, allocate funds and stick to it, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g sufficient<br />

fund<strong>in</strong>g for core <strong>in</strong>frastructure functions.<br />

• Recruit more diverse staff from different backgrounds and cultures, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

more women, more people from the South, more people who are not<br />

290

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!