31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The wider health context | D5<br />

chemical weapons. The US should work to reduce the threat, stop the spread,<br />

and hasten the destruction of chemical weapons by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g the <strong>in</strong>spection<br />

regime and by accelerat<strong>in</strong>g the safe disposal of its own chemical<br />

weapons.<br />

Biological weapons Biological weapons are composed of liv<strong>in</strong>g microorganisms,<br />

such as bacteria and viruses, and products of microorganisms, such as<br />

tox<strong>in</strong>s. They are designed to cause disease, disability, and death <strong>in</strong> humans or<br />

animals. Some diseases, such as smallpox, can be spread from <strong>one</strong> <strong>in</strong>fected<br />

person to another; others, such as anthrax, cannot. Tox<strong>in</strong>s such as botul<strong>in</strong>um<br />

are viewed as both biological and chemical weapons. Biological weapons have<br />

rarely been effectively used (Carus 2000) but the release of anthrax spores <strong>in</strong><br />

the US <strong>in</strong> 2001 and allegations that some nations have stockpiles of smallpox<br />

virus have caused concern (Cohen et al. 2004).<br />

The 1975 Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) prohibits the development,<br />

production, stockpil<strong>in</strong>g, retention, and acquisition of biological agents<br />

or tox<strong>in</strong>s of any type or quantity that do not have protective, medical, or other<br />

peaceful purposes, and of any weapons or means of delivery for them. The<br />

US and other nations need to strengthen it to <strong>in</strong>clude a str<strong>in</strong>gent verification<br />

protocol by enactment of enabl<strong>in</strong>g legislation by all nations, and by suspension<br />

of ambiguous ‘defensive’ research (Arms Control Association 2004).<br />

Anti-personnel landm<strong>in</strong>es Anti-personnel landm<strong>in</strong>es have been called ‘weapons<br />

of mass destruction, <strong>one</strong> person at a time’. Civilians are the most likely to<br />

be <strong>in</strong>jured or killed by landm<strong>in</strong>es, which have been <strong>in</strong>serted <strong>in</strong>to the ground<br />

of many nations (Stover et al.1997). S<strong>in</strong>ce the entry <strong>in</strong>to force of the Anti-<br />

Personnel Landm<strong>in</strong>e Convention <strong>in</strong> 1997, production has markedly dropped,<br />

20 million stockpiled m<strong>in</strong>es have been destroyed, and four million have been<br />

cleared. It has been signed by 144 countries, but the US, Russian Federation,<br />

South Korea, India, Pakistan and Ch<strong>in</strong>a, which between them have stockpiles<br />

of more than 180 million anti-personnel m<strong>in</strong>es, have not ratified it (The Lancet<br />

2004). Many m<strong>in</strong>es are still buried, and enormous resources are required to<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ue unearth<strong>in</strong>g and destroy<strong>in</strong>g them; an additional 20,000 people will<br />

probably be <strong>in</strong>jured by m<strong>in</strong>es dur<strong>in</strong>g 2005, most <strong>in</strong> poor areas with limited<br />

access to health care and rehabilitation.<br />

Small arms and light weapons ‘Conventional weapons’ such as explosives,<br />

<strong>in</strong>cendiaries, and small arms cause the vast majority of casualties <strong>in</strong> current<br />

wars. Much can be d<strong>one</strong> to improve control over legal small arms to decrease<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!