Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file

31.10.2014 Views

The wider health context | D1 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001a). Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2001b). Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2001c). Climate change 2001: synthesis report. A contribution to Working Groups I, II and III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. [Watson RT and the Core writing team (eds.)]. Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press. IPCC (2001d). Climate change 2001: mitigation. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. International Climate Change Taskforce (2005). Meeting the climate challenge: recommendations of the international climate task force. London, Washington DC and Canberra, Institute for Public Policy Research, The Center for American Progress, The Australia Institute. King D (2004). Climate change science: adapt, mitigate or ignore. Science, 303:176–7. Lohmann L (2001). Corner House Briefing 24: Democracy or carbocracy? Intellectual corruption and the future of the climate debate. London, The Corner House. McMichael AJ et al. eds. (2003). Climate change and human health: risks and responses. Geneva, WHO. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, eds (1996). The global burden of disease: a comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Cambridge (MA), Harvard University Press. Newman P and Kenworthy J (1999). Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington DC. Parry M et al (2001). Millions at risk. Global Environment Change. Tiempo, Issue 44/45, September (www.cru.uea.ac.uk/tiempo/floor0/archive/issue4445/t4445a7. htm, accessed 21 March 2005). Pucher J, Lefevere C (1996). The urban transport crisis in Europe and North America. London, Macmillan Press. Reuters (2003). Sierra Club Challenges Ford’s Fuel Economy at 100. Reuters, 5 June. Schwela D and Zali O eds (1999). Urban traffic pollution. New York, WHO. Thomas CD et al. (2004). Extinction risk from climate change. Nature, 427, 145–8. Whitelegg J and Haq G (2003). The Global Transport Problem: Same Issues but a Different Place. In: Whitelegg J and Haq G eds. The Earthscan Reader in World Transport Policy and Practice. Earthscan, London. WHO (2003). Climate change and human health – risks and responses: summary. Geneva, WHO. WHO (2004). World report on road traffic injury prevention. Geneva, WHO. Woodward A et al. (2000). Protecting human health in a changing world: the role of social and economic development. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78 (9):1148-1155. World Meteorological Organization (WMO) (2004). WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 2004: Global Temperature Fourth Warmest. Geneva, WMO. 206

D2 | Water Access to enough clean water, taken for granted by most people in developed countries, is a matter of life and death for millions (see Box D2.1). The daily grind of searching for and collecting water is also part of a state of poverty that affects dignity, self-respect and other aspects of well-being that transcend the notion of ‘basic’ needs (Jarmon 1997). Water scarcity should also be framed as an environmental and political issue. Climate change could account for 20% of the projected increase in global water scarcity, while continuing deforestation and the destruction of wetlands would also reduce freshwater access to many communities. Freshwater resources are further reduced by environmental pollution – for example, two million tons of industrial wastes and chemicals, human waste, agricultural fertilizers, pesticides and pesticide residues are disposed of in receiving waters every day (UN/WWAP 2003). As ever, the poor are the worst affected, with half the population of developing countries exposed to polluted water sources. This chapter focuses on one particular aspect of the global water crisis – the privatization and commodification of water and water services. UN agencies and governments often refer to the essential human right to adequate access to water, its special cultural and religious value and the requirement for the governance of water to be democratic, just, transparent and accountable: ‘Water should be treated as a social and cultural good, and not primarily as an economic commodity’ (United Nations Economic and Social Council 2002). However, increasing privatization suggests a gap between the rhetoric of human rights and the treatment of water as a commodity governed by market forces. Access to water and sanitation An estimated 2.6 billion people – about 40% of humanity – lack adequate sanitation and 1.1 billion lack access to ‘improved’ water sources (WHO/ UNICEF 2002). The lowest drinking water coverage rates are in Sub-Saharan Africa (58%) and in the Pacific (52%), but the largest numbers of unserved people are in Asia. India and China have nearly 1.5 billion people without adequate sanitation. The number of people without access to adequate sanitation rose between 1990 and 2000 (WHO 2002) and none of the regions with inadequate sanitation are on track for meeting the MDG sanitation target. A growing 207

D2 | Water<br />

Access to enough clean water, taken for granted by most people <strong>in</strong> developed<br />

countries, is a matter of life and death for millions (see Box D2.1). The daily<br />

gr<strong>in</strong>d of search<strong>in</strong>g for and collect<strong>in</strong>g water is also part of a state of poverty that<br />

affects dignity, self-respect and other aspects of well-be<strong>in</strong>g that transcend the<br />

notion of ‘basic’ needs (Jarmon 1997).<br />

Water scarcity should also be framed as an environmental and political<br />

issue. Climate change could account for 20% of the projected <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> global<br />

water scarcity, while cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g deforestation and the destruction of wetlands<br />

would also reduce freshwater access to many communities. Freshwater resources<br />

are further reduced by environmental pollution – for example, two<br />

million tons of <strong>in</strong>dustrial wastes and chemicals, human waste, agricultural<br />

fertilizers, pesticides and pesticide residues are disposed of <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g waters<br />

every day (UN/WWAP 2003). As ever, the poor are the worst affected, with half<br />

the population of develop<strong>in</strong>g countries exposed to polluted water sources.<br />

This chapter focuses on <strong>one</strong> particular aspect of the global water crisis – the<br />

privatization and commodification of water and water services. UN agencies<br />

and governments often refer to the essential human right to adequate access<br />

to water, its special cultural and religious value and the requirement for the<br />

governance of water to be democratic, just, transparent and accountable:<br />

‘Water should be treated as a social and cultural good, and not primarily<br />

as an economic commodity’ (United Nations Economic and Social Council<br />

2002). However, <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g privatization suggests a gap between the rhetoric<br />

of human rights and the treatment of water as a commodity governed by<br />

market forces.<br />

Access to water and sanitation<br />

An estimated 2.6 billion people – about 40% of humanity – lack adequate<br />

sanitation and 1.1 billion lack access to ‘improved’ water sources (WHO/<br />

UNICEF 2002). The lowest dr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g water coverage rates are <strong>in</strong> Sub-Saharan<br />

Africa (58%) and <strong>in</strong> the Pacific (52%), but the largest numbers of unserved people<br />

are <strong>in</strong> Asia. India and Ch<strong>in</strong>a have nearly 1.5 billion people without adequate<br />

sanitation. The number of people without access to adequate sanitation rose<br />

between 1990 and 2000 (WHO 2002) and n<strong>one</strong> of the regions with <strong>in</strong>adequate<br />

sanitation are on track for meet<strong>in</strong>g the MDG sanitation target. A grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!