Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file
Acknowledgements Research Support Centre, Zimbabwe; University of the West Indies, Trinidad; War on Want, UK; Water for All Campaign, Public Citizen, US; WaterAid, UK; Wemos, Netherlands; Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights, Netherlands; World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action (WABA), Malaysia. The secretariat would like to express their deep gratitude to Robert Molteno and Anne Rodford at Zed Books and to typesetter Ewan Smith and cover designer Andrew Corbett for their speedy and efficient facilitation of this edition of the Watch. Thanks also to Moyra Rushby and Gill Reeve and the rest of the staff and board of Medact as well as Antoinette Ntuli, Farana Khan and Halima Hoosen-Preston at GEGA and Ravi Narayan, Nisha Susan and Abraham Thomas at the PHM Global Secretariat for supporting us so well. Global Health Watch secretariat and editorial team: Claudia Lema; David McCoy; Patricia Morton; Michael Rowson; Jane Salvage; Sarah Sexton. xvi
Foreword New reports on different aspects of the state of the world’s health appear daily. International and national organizations of all kinds produce vast amounts of data, statistics and analysis. But what is lacking in this flood of information is honest and transparent assessment of the actions and policies that affect health and health inequalities, for good or ill, presented in a format that is accessible and understandable by health workers and civil society groups. How far do all the health projects, programmes, technical cooperation, aid and loans actually improve the health of poor people round the world? And how far do the actions of transnational corporations, global financial institutions and international trade rules undermine it? Recognizing this, the People’s Health Movement, the Global Equity Gauge Alliance and Medact came together in 2003 to plan a review of the performance of the very institutions that normally write global reports. It was time to turn the tables by reporting and assessing the actions of international health agencies such as the World Health Organization and UNICEF, donor agencies, rich country governments, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization. It was time to produce an alternative world health report that would highlight the root causes of poor health and reveal the gap between humanitarian rhetoric and reality. This first edition of the Global Health Watch is the result, designed to create a joint platform for civil society organizations and individuals working in health and health-related sectors, including gender discrimination, global trade environmental protection, access to water and food, the arms trade, the peace movement and disaster relief. Global Health Watch 2005–2006 has achieved this, and we hope to continue and improve the collaboration between these actors. The report has limitations. We tried to involve people from as many countries as possible, but lacked adequate input from many regions, including the Middle East and China. Many key issues relevant to health are covered, but not everything of importance. With a limited budget and a tiny secretariat, we were simply unable to cover everything. What we have created, however, is the prototype of an instrument to ‘watch’ how international and national governments, agencies, banks, corporations, rules and structures act and perform in improving or worsening health and health inequities. This edition does not xvii
- Page 1 and 2: About this book Today’s global he
- Page 3 and 4: Global Health Watch 2005-2006 An al
- Page 5 and 6: Contents Boxes, figures and tables
- Page 7 and 8: C2.1 The facts about disability 180
- Page 9 and 10: Illustrations 1 Medicine cannot dea
- Page 11 and 12: Acknowledgements The following indi
- Page 13 and 14: London School of Hygiene and Tropic
- Page 15: Victoria, Canada; Centre for Health
- Page 19 and 20: Introduction Origins The Global Hea
- Page 21 and 22: Child malnutrition, death and disab
- Page 23 and 24: Human rights and responsibilities A
- Page 25 and 26: impacting on health. The Watch hope
- Page 27: part a | Health and globalization T
- Page 30 and 31: Health and globalization | A1 and h
- Page 32 and 33: Health and globalization | A1 in 20
- Page 34 and 35: Health and globalization | A1 is gl
- Page 36 and 37: Health and globalization | A1 peopl
- Page 38 and 39: Health and globalization | A1 numbe
- Page 40 and 41: Health and globalization | A1 and p
- Page 42 and 43: Health and globalization | A1 econo
- Page 44 and 45: Health and globalization | A1 Box A
- Page 46 and 47: Health and globalization | A1 half
- Page 48 and 49: Health and globalization | A1 appro
- Page 50 and 51: table a1 Key health concerns with W
- Page 52 and 53: Health and globalization | A1 Healt
- Page 54 and 55: Health and globalization | A1 merci
- Page 56 and 57: Health and globalization | A1 thems
- Page 58 and 59: Health and globalization | A1 Even
- Page 60 and 61: Health and globalization | A1 • A
- Page 62 and 63: Health and globalization | A1 non-v
- Page 64 and 65: Health and globalization | A1 27-28
Foreword<br />
New reports on different aspects of the state of the world’s health appear<br />
daily. International and national organizations of all k<strong>in</strong>ds produce vast<br />
amounts of data, statistics and analysis. But what is lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this flood of<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation is h<strong>one</strong>st and transparent assessment of the actions and policies<br />
that affect health and health <strong>in</strong>equalities, for good or ill, presented <strong>in</strong><br />
a format that is accessible and understandable by health workers and civil<br />
society groups. How far do all the health projects, programmes, technical<br />
cooperation, aid and loans actually improve the health of poor people round<br />
the world? And how far do the actions of transnational corporations, global<br />
f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions and <strong>in</strong>ternational trade rules underm<strong>in</strong>e it?<br />
Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g this, the People’s <strong>Health</strong> Movement, the <strong>Global</strong> Equity Gauge<br />
Alliance and Medact came together <strong>in</strong> 2003 to plan a review of the performance<br />
of the very <strong>in</strong>stitutions that normally write global reports. It was time to<br />
turn the tables by report<strong>in</strong>g and assess<strong>in</strong>g the actions of <strong>in</strong>ternational health<br />
agencies such as the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization and UNICEF, donor agencies,<br />
rich country governments, the World Bank, the International M<strong>one</strong>tary<br />
Fund and the World Trade Organization. It was time to produce an alternative<br />
world health report that would highlight the root causes of poor health and<br />
reveal the gap between humanitarian rhetoric and reality.<br />
This first edition of the <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> is the result, designed to<br />
create a jo<strong>in</strong>t platform for civil society organizations and <strong>in</strong>dividuals work<strong>in</strong>g<br />
<strong>in</strong> health and health-related sectors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gender discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, global<br />
trade environmental protection, access to water and food, the arms trade,<br />
the peace movement and disaster relief. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> 2005–2006<br />
has achieved this, and we hope to cont<strong>in</strong>ue and improve the collaboration<br />
between these actors.<br />
The report has limitations. We tried to <strong>in</strong>volve people from as many countries<br />
as possible, but lacked adequate <strong>in</strong>put from many regions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Middle East and Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Many key issues relevant to health are covered, but<br />
not everyth<strong>in</strong>g of importance. With a limited budget and a t<strong>in</strong>y secretariat, we<br />
were simply unable to cover everyth<strong>in</strong>g. What we have created, however, is the<br />
prototype of an <strong>in</strong>strument to ‘watch’ how <strong>in</strong>ternational and national governments,<br />
agencies, banks, corporations, rules and structures act and perform <strong>in</strong><br />
improv<strong>in</strong>g or worsen<strong>in</strong>g health and health <strong>in</strong>equities. This edition does not<br />
xvii