Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file Global Health Watch 1 in one file

31.10.2014 Views

Acknowledgements Research Support Centre, Zimbabwe; University of the West Indies, Trinidad; War on Want, UK; Water for All Campaign, Public Citizen, US; WaterAid, UK; Wemos, Netherlands; Women’s Global Network for Reproductive Rights, Netherlands; World Alliance for Breastfeeding Action (WABA), Malaysia. The secretariat would like to express their deep gratitude to Robert Molteno and Anne Rodford at Zed Books and to typesetter Ewan Smith and cover designer Andrew Corbett for their speedy and efficient facilitation of this edition of the Watch. Thanks also to Moyra Rushby and Gill Reeve and the rest of the staff and board of Medact as well as Antoinette Ntuli, Farana Khan and Halima Hoosen-Preston at GEGA and Ravi Narayan, Nisha Susan and Abraham Thomas at the PHM Global Secretariat for supporting us so well. Global Health Watch secretariat and editorial team: Claudia Lema; David McCoy; Patricia Morton; Michael Rowson; Jane Salvage; Sarah Sexton. xvi

Foreword New reports on different aspects of the state of the world’s health appear daily. International and national organizations of all kinds produce vast amounts of data, statistics and analysis. But what is lacking in this flood of information is honest and transparent assessment of the actions and policies that affect health and health inequalities, for good or ill, presented in a format that is accessible and understandable by health workers and civil society groups. How far do all the health projects, programmes, technical cooperation, aid and loans actually improve the health of poor people round the world? And how far do the actions of transnational corporations, global financial institutions and international trade rules undermine it? Recognizing this, the People’s Health Movement, the Global Equity Gauge Alliance and Medact came together in 2003 to plan a review of the performance of the very institutions that normally write global reports. It was time to turn the tables by reporting and assessing the actions of international health agencies such as the World Health Organization and UNICEF, donor agencies, rich country governments, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organization. It was time to produce an alternative world health report that would highlight the root causes of poor health and reveal the gap between humanitarian rhetoric and reality. This first edition of the Global Health Watch is the result, designed to create a joint platform for civil society organizations and individuals working in health and health-related sectors, including gender discrimination, global trade environmental protection, access to water and food, the arms trade, the peace movement and disaster relief. Global Health Watch 2005–2006 has achieved this, and we hope to continue and improve the collaboration between these actors. The report has limitations. We tried to involve people from as many countries as possible, but lacked adequate input from many regions, including the Middle East and China. Many key issues relevant to health are covered, but not everything of importance. With a limited budget and a tiny secretariat, we were simply unable to cover everything. What we have created, however, is the prototype of an instrument to ‘watch’ how international and national governments, agencies, banks, corporations, rules and structures act and perform in improving or worsening health and health inequities. This edition does not xvii

Foreword<br />

New reports on different aspects of the state of the world’s health appear<br />

daily. International and national organizations of all k<strong>in</strong>ds produce vast<br />

amounts of data, statistics and analysis. But what is lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this flood of<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation is h<strong>one</strong>st and transparent assessment of the actions and policies<br />

that affect health and health <strong>in</strong>equalities, for good or ill, presented <strong>in</strong><br />

a format that is accessible and understandable by health workers and civil<br />

society groups. How far do all the health projects, programmes, technical<br />

cooperation, aid and loans actually improve the health of poor people round<br />

the world? And how far do the actions of transnational corporations, global<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>stitutions and <strong>in</strong>ternational trade rules underm<strong>in</strong>e it?<br />

Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g this, the People’s <strong>Health</strong> Movement, the <strong>Global</strong> Equity Gauge<br />

Alliance and Medact came together <strong>in</strong> 2003 to plan a review of the performance<br />

of the very <strong>in</strong>stitutions that normally write global reports. It was time to<br />

turn the tables by report<strong>in</strong>g and assess<strong>in</strong>g the actions of <strong>in</strong>ternational health<br />

agencies such as the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization and UNICEF, donor agencies,<br />

rich country governments, the World Bank, the International M<strong>one</strong>tary<br />

Fund and the World Trade Organization. It was time to produce an alternative<br />

world health report that would highlight the root causes of poor health and<br />

reveal the gap between humanitarian rhetoric and reality.<br />

This first edition of the <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> is the result, designed to<br />

create a jo<strong>in</strong>t platform for civil society organizations and <strong>in</strong>dividuals work<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong> health and health-related sectors, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g gender discrim<strong>in</strong>ation, global<br />

trade environmental protection, access to water and food, the arms trade,<br />

the peace movement and disaster relief. <strong>Global</strong> <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Watch</strong> 2005–2006<br />

has achieved this, and we hope to cont<strong>in</strong>ue and improve the collaboration<br />

between these actors.<br />

The report has limitations. We tried to <strong>in</strong>volve people from as many countries<br />

as possible, but lacked adequate <strong>in</strong>put from many regions, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

Middle East and Ch<strong>in</strong>a. Many key issues relevant to health are covered, but<br />

not everyth<strong>in</strong>g of importance. With a limited budget and a t<strong>in</strong>y secretariat, we<br />

were simply unable to cover everyth<strong>in</strong>g. What we have created, however, is the<br />

prototype of an <strong>in</strong>strument to ‘watch’ how <strong>in</strong>ternational and national governments,<br />

agencies, banks, corporations, rules and structures act and perform <strong>in</strong><br />

improv<strong>in</strong>g or worsen<strong>in</strong>g health and health <strong>in</strong>equities. This edition does not<br />

xvii

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!