31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

and governments’ regulatory capacity is particularly worry<strong>in</strong>g given grow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

evidence that Big Pharma rout<strong>in</strong>ely places profit marg<strong>in</strong>s above the imperative<br />

to protect patient safety, and has become a corrupt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence on public<br />

health, academic and cl<strong>in</strong>ical practice. These issues are discussed later.<br />

Dispell<strong>in</strong>g the myth that patents promote efficient and <strong>in</strong>novative<br />

pharmaceutical R&D<br />

Pharmaceutical companies repeatedly claim that patent protection is ‘the<br />

goose that lays the golden egg’ – that the companies’ monopoly power is a<br />

price worth pay<strong>in</strong>g because it leads to new medic<strong>in</strong>es. However, this argument<br />

is built on a number of myths that, when exposed, po<strong>in</strong>t to a moral and logical<br />

need for fundamental reform of how pharmaceutical research is f<strong>in</strong>anced<br />

and rewarded.<br />

Firstly, Big Pharma portrays its <strong>in</strong>dustry as a highly risky <strong>one</strong> <strong>in</strong> a competitive<br />

market, just able to cover its enormous R&D costs but manag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

How much does it really cost to manufacture a drug?<br />

In November 2001, the Tufts Centre for the Study of Drug Development, which is 65%<br />

funded by the <strong>in</strong>dustry, came out with a figure of $802m. Public Citizen, a consumer<br />

organisation, did a detailed analysis of the figure and concluded that it was <strong>in</strong>flated by<br />

about 75%. In addition, n<strong>one</strong> of the 68 drugs Tufts considered had been developed with<br />

the help of government m<strong>one</strong>y, unlike the case with many other medic<strong>in</strong>es.<br />

$802m<br />

$403m<br />

$240m<br />

$71–118m<br />

$802m Roughly half<br />

of this figure is made<br />

up of ʻopportunity<br />

costs of capitalʼ – what<br />

the m<strong>one</strong>y could have<br />

earned if the m<strong>one</strong>y<br />

had been spent<br />

elsewhere <strong>in</strong>stead of<br />

on research.<br />

$403m The Tufts<br />

study says this is the<br />

actual out-pocket<br />

R&D cost. But that is<br />

before tax.<br />

Companies <strong>in</strong> the US<br />

deduct 34% of their<br />

R&D expenses under<br />

federal tax law.<br />

$240m This is the<br />

real cash outlay<br />

after tax breaks –<br />

but only for the<br />

most expensive<br />

drugs, developed<br />

without government<br />

assistance.<br />

$71-118m This is the<br />

figure Public Citizen<br />

calculated as the<br />

rough R&D cost for<br />

new drugs brought to<br />

the market between<br />

1994 and 2000 based<br />

on data from the drug<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry.<br />

Figure B2.2 How much does it cost to develop a new medic<strong>in</strong>e?<br />

(Source: Guardian 2003)<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!