31.10.2014 Views

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

Global Health Watch 1 in one file

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Box B2.3 ‘Big Pharma’ – profits and power<br />

‘Big Pharma’ is a collective term used to describe the world’s major pharmaceutical<br />

corporations, which are hugely <strong>in</strong>fluential <strong>in</strong> the control of the<br />

trade <strong>in</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>es, and <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g global trade rules and regulations. They<br />

<strong>in</strong>clude Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Merck, Pharmacia, Johnson &<br />

Johnson, Abbott Laboratories, Novartis, American Home Products, Eli Lilly,<br />

Scher<strong>in</strong>g-Plough, GlaxoSmithKl<strong>in</strong>e and Allergan.<br />

The comb<strong>in</strong>ed worth of the world’s top five drug companies is twice the<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed GNP of all Sub-Saharan Africa, and their <strong>in</strong>fluence on the rules<br />

of world trade is many times stronger because they br<strong>in</strong>g their wealth to<br />

bear directly on the levers of western power. Their role <strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

rules on patents by work<strong>in</strong>g hand <strong>in</strong> hand with the US government<br />

and European Commission has been extensively documented (Drahos and<br />

Braithwaite 2004).<br />

Pharmaceutical profits, whether calculated as a percentage of assets<br />

or as a percentage of revenues, are among the highest of any commercial<br />

sector. The comb<strong>in</strong>ed 2002 profits of the 10 biggest pharmaceutical<br />

companies, listed <strong>in</strong> Fortune magaz<strong>in</strong>e’s annual review of the largest US<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>esses, were US$ 35.9 billion – compris<strong>in</strong>g more than half the US$<br />

69.6 billion profits netted by the entire roster of Fortune 500 companies.<br />

These profits are reflected <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>credible earn<strong>in</strong>gs of top executives. For<br />

example, the former chairman and CEO of Bristol-Myers Squibb made<br />

US$74,890,918 <strong>in</strong> 2001, not count<strong>in</strong>g his US$76,095,611 worth of unexercised<br />

stock options (Families USA 2001).<br />

With such profits at stake, it is no surprise Big Pharma <strong>in</strong>vests a huge<br />

amount of m<strong>one</strong>y <strong>in</strong> protect<strong>in</strong>g them. Drug companies have the largest<br />

lobby <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton, and contribute copiously to political campaigns. Well<br />

over $100 million went to pay<strong>in</strong>g for issue ads, hir<strong>in</strong>g academics, fund<strong>in</strong>g<br />

non-profits and other activities to promote the <strong>in</strong>dustry’s agenda <strong>in</strong> Wash<strong>in</strong>gton<br />

(Public Citizen 2003). In 2002, the drug <strong>in</strong>dustry hired 675 different<br />

lobbyists from 138 firms – nearly seven lobbyists for each US senator. Drug<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry lobbyists <strong>in</strong>clude 26 former members of Congress and all told, 342<br />

of them have ‘revolv<strong>in</strong>g door’ connections with the federal government.<br />

ond is the corrupt<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>fluence of profit-driven pharmaceutical companies on<br />

health professionals, academics and regulatory bodies. The third is the need to<br />

reshape the way pharmaceutical R&D is funded and <strong>in</strong>centives offered. The<br />

Medic<strong>in</strong>es<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!