31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49635<br />

1360. Contrary to the Defence’s submissions, the Trial Chamber considers that the evidence<br />

of Witness JF-039 in relation to the Golubić camp in 1991 is generally internally consistent.<br />

Any minor inconsistencies 2507 are not such as to affect the overall reliability of his evidence.<br />

Further, his evidence is generally consistent with that of Milan Babić regarding the<br />

involvement of Stanišić and Simatović in the Golubić camp. Witness JF-039’s testimony and<br />

Captain Dragan’s assertions contained in the documentary entitled “The Unit” 2508 are<br />

corroborated by the evidence of Witness JF-031 as well as by contemporaneous reports by<br />

Captain Dragan and Franko Simatović. 2509 Having further observed the witness’s demeanour<br />

in court, the Trial Chamber concludes that Witness JF-039’s testimony in relation to the<br />

Golubić camp in 1991 is reliable and considers Dragan’s assertions in the documentary “The<br />

Unit” in relation to Golubić to be reliable. The Trial Chamber further refers to its discussion<br />

in relation to the Korenica and Knin fortress camps, below, regarding the order on the<br />

withdrawal of weapons from the Knin fortress, 2510 which it determines to be authentic.<br />

1361. The Stanišić Defence and the Simatović Defence further submit that Simatović went to<br />

the SAO Krajina to collect intelligence, conduct surveillance, and monitor the activities of<br />

Captain Dragan as part of an ongoing intelligence operation. 2511 The Trial Chamber considers<br />

that Serbian DB reports in evidence clearly establish that Serbian DB operatives Franko<br />

Simatović and Dragan Filipović monitored Captain Dragan’s activities in Belgrade from the<br />

end of 1990 through to his departure to the SAO Krajina in April 1991 and that the Serbian<br />

DB continued to do so from August 1991, when Captain Dragan returned to Belgrade.<br />

1362. The Defence argues that its interpretation of the evidence is supported by the testimony<br />

of Radivoje Mičić. Mičić was a Serbian DB colleague of Simatović in 1991. However, the<br />

Trial Chamber considers this witness to have been evasive in answering certain questions.<br />

Further, the witness conceded that he was not directly involved in the case of Captain Dragan<br />

and that DB operatives were informed about cases only on a need-to-know-basis. Further, by<br />

his own admission, Mičić held a relatively low position within the Serbian DB and did not<br />

visit the Krajina during the relevant time. 2512<br />

2507 For instance, with regard to the date of the arrival of Captain Dragan and other instructors at the Golubić<br />

camp in 1991.<br />

2508 In evidence as exhibit P2976.<br />

2509 Including those in evidence as exhibits P1009, P1179, P1186, and P3251<br />

2510 In evidence as exhibit P979.<br />

2511 Simatović Defence Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012 (Confidential), paras 185-192, 227-229, 336;<br />

Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012 (Confidential), paras 298, <strong>30</strong>1, 314.<br />

2512 Radivoje Mičić, T. 19874, 19875, 19877-19878.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 483<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!