31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49253<br />

autumn 1991 or in the beginning of 1992, Kostić also participated in organising the transport<br />

of 100-<strong>30</strong>0 weapons from Belgrade to Zvornik. The Trial Chamber further considered the<br />

evidence of Witness B-161 that Pavlović had played the biggest role in arming of the Serb<br />

paramilitaries and other units. The Trial Chamber found that Witness JF-026’s hearsay<br />

evidence about Pavlović organizing weapons distribution together with the head of the<br />

Loznica DB lacked sufficient foundation. Although it accepted the possibility that Kostić and<br />

Pavlović participated in organising deliveries of weapons to the Zvornik TO and that Pavlović<br />

had some contact with Milan Tepavčević, in the absence of any further evidence about the<br />

role of the Accused in these arming activities, the Trial Chamber was unable to conclude that<br />

the acts of Kostić and Pavlović can be attributed to the Accused. In my view, given the links<br />

between Kostić, Pavlović, and the Serbian DB, I do not consider that evidence concerning the<br />

direct role of the Accused was required in order to demonstrate their involvement in these<br />

arming activities. I do not find it credible that Kostić and Pavlović decided to arm the Zvornik<br />

TO of their own initiative. Nor do I consider that they decided that the weapons had to be<br />

provided by the Serbian DB. I have been unable to persuade myself that either of these<br />

conclusions would be reasonable. I conclude that the only reasonable interpretation of the<br />

evidence is that through Kostić and Pavlović, the Accused substantially contributed to the<br />

commission of the crimes in Zvornik, which they themselves intended to be committed.<br />

Conclusion<br />

2402. I believe that it has been established beyond a reasonable doubt by the evidence<br />

reviewed in the Judgement, that the Accused:<br />

- created at least one paramilitary unit that operated throughout the war. The Unit was at the<br />

root of the ethnic cleansing in Croatia, and committed crimes with the aim of deporting the<br />

non-Serbian population from large territories;<br />

- set up training camps, the first of which was Golubić. These training camps provided<br />

military training for the Accuseds’ own paramilitary unit, the Unit, as well as the SAO<br />

Krajina Police and others;<br />

- engaged the Unit with the knowledge that it had already carried out criminal activities in<br />

collaboration with others in many military operations with a criminal objective;<br />

- had, and maintained, control over the men who were directly responsible for ethnic<br />

cleansing, such as Martić, Arkan, and Hadžić, and provided them with the means to achieve<br />

their goals and guided them in their task;<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 865<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!