31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49255<br />

17 April without significant resistance. During and after the “military operations”, many<br />

abuses were committed, in particular by members of the Unit that were not necessary from a<br />

military aspect and that could only be explained by their wish to terrorise the population in<br />

order to force it to leave the town which in fact subsequently occurred.<br />

2396. The town of Doboj was not properly defended. It fell so rapidly to the Serbs (in less<br />

than five hours on 3 <strong>May</strong> 1992) that one must question the need to deploy the Unit and leave<br />

it there. The many crimes in Doboj and in the municipality were committed by paramilitary<br />

groups and, in particular by the Red Berets. The Red Berets came at the beginning of 1992<br />

and set up training camps for their own use, but also for the other paramilitaries who were<br />

there. Between 3 and 7 <strong>May</strong> 1992 the Serbian and Muslim population was initially separated<br />

after which the Muslims were deported. It is clear that in this municipality the objective of the<br />

military operation corresponds to the criminal objective. This is true for almost all of the<br />

crimes, but it is most obvious in Doboj. It is also significant in terms of the intent of the joint<br />

criminal enterprise that the fact that the Red Berets, who had just committed a number of<br />

crimes and deported the non-Serb population from Bosanski Šamac, were sent to this town.<br />

This could neither have been accidental, nor motivated by military objectives alone. The fact<br />

that the Accused knew of the involvement of their Unit in the crimes committed in Bosanski<br />

Šamac and the fact that they sent them soon after that to Doboj shows their intent.<br />

2397. With regard to Zvornik, the Trial Chamber found that the SDG committed murder,<br />

deportation, and persecution, and that the Zvornik TO, among others, committed deportation<br />

in this municipality in 1992. 5103 I recall the incident of deportation in the Kozluk and Skočić<br />

villages where the civilian non-Serb population were given an ultimatum to leave by, inter<br />

alia, Marko Pavlović, who signed the orders of deportation. 5104 I also recall the testimony of<br />

Witness JF-061 according to whom Marko Pavlović, as head of the TO, coordinated all the<br />

armed forces and paramilitaries operating in Zvornik. In a meeting held on <strong>30</strong> June 1992<br />

Mladić notes that Pavlović declared that “volunteer formations enjoyed an exceptional<br />

success; they were led by Šešelj and Arkan”.<br />

2398. The Trial Chamber further found that there were clear links between the Accused and<br />

the SDG. I have dealt with them above. I find that they are indicative of the relationship<br />

between both Accused and the SDG throughout the Indictment period. In this respect, I would<br />

5102 I refer to the Trial Chamber’s findings in relation to the Mount Ozren and Vila camps.<br />

5103 I refer to the Trial Chamber’s findings in chapters 3.8.1, 3.8.2, and 4.4.2.<br />

5104 Witness JF-061, T. 10959.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 863<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!