31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49270<br />

6.11 Other modes of liability<br />

2355. Planning and ordering. The Prosecution alleges planning and ordering as additional<br />

modes of liability in relation to all crimes charged in the Indictment. 5035 In its Final Trial<br />

Brief, the Prosecution argues that the Accused planned and/or ordered the alleged crimes in<br />

Glina, Struga, and Lovinac as reflected in chapter 3.1.7, in Vukovar as reflected in chapter<br />

3.2.6, and in Bosanski Šamac and Doboj as reflected in chapters 3.4 and 3.5 respectively. 5036<br />

The Trial Chamber recalls its findings from chapters 4.3.2, 4.4.2, 4.5.2, and 6, and considers<br />

that it has not been proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Accused planned and/or<br />

ordered the crimes referenced in the aforementioned chapters, nor any of the other crimes<br />

charged in the indictment.<br />

2356. Aiding and abetting. The Prosecution alleges aiding and abetting as an additional mode<br />

of liability in relation to all crimes charged in the Indictment. 5037 In its Final Trial Brief, the<br />

Prosecution specifically argues that the Accused aided and abetted the alleged crimes in the<br />

SAO Krajina, specifically Lovinac, in the SAO SBWS, specifically Vukovar, in Bijeljina,<br />

Zvornik, Bosanski Šamac, Doboj, Trnovo, and Sanski Most. 5038 The Trial Chamber will first<br />

assess whether the Accused’s alleged direct participation in the attacks on Lovinac and<br />

Vukovar aided and abetted crimes committed during these attacks. It will then analyze<br />

whether the Accused’s acts and conduct vis-à-vis certain groups, in particular the Unit, aided<br />

and abetted any crimes.<br />

2357. In relation to Lovinac, the Prosecution submits that Simatović’s personal participation<br />

in “an attack designed to promote ethnic cleansing” had a substantial effect on the crimes of<br />

deportation and forcible transfer. 5039 The Trial Chamber recalls that its analysis in chapter<br />

3.7.1 that there was insufficient evidence to conclude that the crimes of deportation, forcible<br />

transfer, or persecution were committed in the attack on Lovinac in June 1991. As a result,<br />

there is no crime to hold Franko Simatović criminally responsible for aiding and abetting.<br />

2358. In relation to Vukovar, the Prosecution submits that Stanišić aided and abetted crimes<br />

in Vukovar by “personally involving himself in the leadership of the Vukovar operation”. 5040<br />

The Prosecution further submits that Simatović aided and abetted these crimes by attending a<br />

5035 Indictment, paras 10, 16-17, 25, 63, 66.<br />

5036 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 731, 736, 747, 753.<br />

5037 Indictment, paras 10, 16-17, 25, 63, 66.<br />

5038 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 762-782.<br />

5039 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, para. 765.<br />

5040 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, para. 767.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 848<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!