31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49274<br />

Goran Hadžić, Blagoje Adžić, Simatović, and Mihalj Kertes. 5018 The witness either knew their<br />

names from television or he heard their names from fellow soldiers. 5019 When the witness<br />

came into the meeting room to serve drinks, he saw a map of Vukovar on the wall, with some<br />

positions marked. 5020 After the fall of Vukovar, the witness was present near a celebration in a<br />

military tent, which was attended by many officers, including Mrkšić, Šljivančanin, Stojičić,<br />

Petar Gračanin, Hadzić, Adžić, Šešelj, Arkan, Kertes, Radmilo Bogdanović, and<br />

Simatović. 5021 Other soldiers told the witness the names of these persons. 5022<br />

2345. The Trial Chamber recalls its findings in chapters 3.2.6 and 4.4.2 in relation to crimes<br />

committed during and after the attack on Vukovar in November 1991, namely the deportation<br />

of many non-Serbs from the SAO SBWS, including from Vukovar. It further recalls its<br />

conclusion in chapters 3.2.6 and 6.3.3 in in relation to Ležimir that there is insufficient<br />

evidence to establish whether Unit members participated in the attack on Vukovar. With<br />

regard to Simatović’s attendance at the meeting and celebration, described by Witness JF-033,<br />

the Trial Chamber notes that the witness did not provide any details about what was discussed<br />

on those occasions, beyond that it was related to the attack on Vukovar, nor about Simatović’s<br />

participation in the discussion. The majority, Judge Picard dissenting, does not consider<br />

Simatović’s presence on those two occasions to indicate that he shared the intent to forcibly<br />

and permanently remove the non-Serbs from Vukovar. The majority, Judge Picard dissenting,<br />

considers that Simatović’s presence on those two occasions could also reasonably be<br />

interpreted to indicate that his intent was limited to support for the Serb forces’ successful<br />

military take–over of Vukovar.<br />

2346. With regard to Operation Udar, the Prosecution submits that the goal of this operation<br />

was to drive the Muslim population out of eastern Bosnia-Herzegovina, which was, in turn, a<br />

part of the larger plan to create an ethnically pure corridor in the Drina river valley and<br />

eliminate the Drina as a border between Serbian states. 5023 The Prosecution further submits<br />

that the Unit, under Simatović’s command and in coordination with the VRS and VJ, was<br />

active in combat operations in this area of eastern Bosnia-Herzegovina during this period. 5024<br />

5018 P431 (Witness JF-033, prior transcript, 2-3 September 2003), pp. 6-7, 76, 78.<br />

5019 P431 (Witness JF-033, prior transcript, 2-3 September 2003), pp. 7-8; Witness JF-033, T. 4998.<br />

5020 P431 (Witness JF-033, prior transcript, 2-3 September 2003), p. 7; Witness JF-033, T. 4998.<br />

5021 P431 (Witness JF-033, prior transcript, 2-3 September 2003), pp. 10, 84; Witness JF-033, T. 4998-4999,<br />

50<strong>30</strong>-5031.<br />

5022 Witness JF-033, T. 50<strong>30</strong>.<br />

5023 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 135, 698.<br />

5024 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, para. 137.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 844<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!