31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49277<br />

conclude that Stanišić directed the involvement of any of the above-mentioned Serb Forces.<br />

This means that that he did not command them in any military operations, including when<br />

crimes were committed. He organized the involvement of the Unit in numerous military<br />

operations, which often meant that he deployed them to these operations where they were<br />

placed within other command structures. The evidence reviewed in relation to a number of the<br />

Unit’s operations points to these operations having been military actions directed against the<br />

opposing Croat forces and does not indicate that any crimes were committed during the<br />

operations. 5008 Stanišić’s involvement with the other Serb Forces, as recalled above, was even<br />

less direct. Stanišić’s connection with the Serb Forces, other than the Unit, is remote and does<br />

not indicate that he had influence or control over the members’ actions, at least in specific<br />

operations where crimes were committed. The Trial Chamber has also considered what can be<br />

inferred from Stanišić’s interactions and cooperation with other persons, including his actions<br />

set out in chapter 6.8. As noted above, Stanišić cooperated with others through the Unit’s<br />

operations and its training of other forces and through the organization of financing and other<br />

support, as set out above. These other persons included Milan Martić, Mile Mrkšić, and Ratko<br />

Mladić. The Trial Chamber is satisfied that Milan Martić had the intent to deport persons<br />

from the SAO Krajina, 5009 and has reviewed evidence above indicating that Mrkšić and<br />

Mladić may also have shared the alleged common criminal purpose. However, the majority,<br />

Judge Picard dissenting, does not consider that it is able, on the basis of the evidence before it,<br />

to establish beyond a reasonable doubt Stanišić’s intent to further the alleged common<br />

criminal purpose from his interactions and cooperation with others. The Trial Chamber further<br />

refers to its conclusions in chapter 6.10.<br />

2336. Based on the foregoing, the majority, Judge Picard dissenting, cannot conclude that the<br />

only reasonable inference from the evidence on Stanišić’s actions, as described above, is that,<br />

from April 1991 through 1995, he shared the intent to further the common criminal purpose of<br />

forcibly and permanently removing the majority of non-Serbs from large areas of Croatia and<br />

Bosnia-Herzegovina, through the commission of murder, deportation, forcible transfer, and<br />

persecution (or through only deportation and forcible transfer).<br />

5008 The Trial Chamber refers to the evidence reviewed in chapters 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 in relation to the Ležimir<br />

camp.<br />

5009 The Trial Chamber refers to chapter 4.4.2.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 841<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!