31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49282<br />

2326. As set out above, the Trial Chamber concludes that it may have been reasonably<br />

foreseeable to Stanišić that Unit members would commit crimes in Doboj municipality in<br />

1992 and considers it likely that Stanišić knowingly deployed them in operations, including in<br />

Skelani in 1993, in which they cooperated with other forces and were subordinate to other<br />

persons who may have had the intent to further the alleged common criminal purpose.<br />

However, the majority, Judge Picard dissenting, does not consider that the only reasonable<br />

inference from Stanišić’s actions with regard to the Unit’s operations is that he shared the<br />

intent to further the alleged common criminal purpose of forcibly and permanently removing<br />

the majority of non-Serbs from large areas of Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The majority,<br />

Judge Picard dissenting, allows for the reasonable possibility that Stanišić’s intent in relation<br />

to the Unit’s operations was limited to establishing and maintaining Serb control over large<br />

areas of Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina. The majority understands the evidence so as that it<br />

may have been reasonably foreseeable that crimes would be committed during the<br />

establishing and maintaining of Serb control but to be insufficient for the first form of JCE<br />

liability. Under these circumstances, the majority, Judge Picard dissenting, does not consider<br />

the evidence of Stanišić’s actions in relation to the Unit’s operations, in itself or in light of the<br />

totality of the evidence regarding the Accused, sufficient to establish beyond a reasonable<br />

doubt that Stanišić shared the intent to further the alleged common criminal purpose through<br />

the commission of crimes.<br />

2327. The Trial Chamber now turns to what can be inferred from the Accused’s actions with<br />

regard to the training of Serb forces between 1991 and 1995. The Trial Chamber recalls that<br />

in 1991, Simatović cooperated with Martić and Captain Dragan in the establishment and<br />

operation of a training camp at Golubić, which the Accused financed. 4992 Simatović also<br />

brought fuel, vehicles, supplies, and equipment to the camp. The Accused organized the<br />

training in 1991 of Unit members, 350-700 SAO Krajina Police and SAO Krajina TO<br />

members, and of forces known as the Kninžas at the Golubić camp and the Knin fortress. 4993<br />

In September and October 1991, the Accused visited the Ležimir camp and told Unit<br />

members they would act as instructors or trainers. 4994 In June 1992, Simatović met with local<br />

municipal leaders in Bajina Bašta to discuss the establishment of training camps with<br />

instructors from Serbia. 4995<br />

4992 In this respect, the Trial Chamber recalls its findings in chapter 6.3.2 in relation to the Golubić camp.<br />

4993 In this respect, the Trial Chamber recalls its findings in chapter 6.3.2 in relation to the Unit’s formalization.<br />

4994 In this respect, the Trial Chamber recalls its findings in chapter 6.3.3 in relation to the Ležimir camp.<br />

4995 In this respect, the Trial Chamber recalls its findings in chapter 6.3.3 in relation the Skelani camp.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 836<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!