31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49297<br />

6.8 Channels of communication<br />

2290. According to the Indictment, the Accused participated in the joint criminal enterprise<br />

by providing “channels of communication” between and among its core members in Belgrade,<br />

in the specific regions, and locally throughout the Indictment period. 4891 In its Final Trial<br />

Brief, the Prosecution argue specifically that Stanišić served as a channel of communication<br />

between Milošević, on the one hand, and Martić and Babić, on the other; between Milošević,<br />

on the one hand, and Hadžić and the RSK government, on the other; and between Milošević<br />

and Karadžić. 4892 With regard to Simatović, the Prosecution argue that he served as a channel<br />

of communication through intelligence-gathering. 4893 In that capacity, both of the Accused coordinated<br />

a large, geographically dispersed and multi-faceted joint criminal enterprise<br />

composed of powerful personalities who were aligned along the common criminal<br />

purpose. 4894 The Trial Chamber understands the allegation in this respect to mean that the<br />

Accused enabled, or at least greatly facilitated contact between the alleged members of the<br />

joint criminal enterprise.<br />

2291. Besides the evidence reviewed below, the Trial Chamber has also considered the<br />

evidence on contacts between the Accused and other alleged members of the joint criminal<br />

enterprise reviewed in other sections of the Judgement, including the evidence on the contacts<br />

between Martić and the Accused reviewed in chapters 6.3.2 in relation to the Golubić camp<br />

and chapter 6.6.2.<br />

2292. With regard to serving as a channel of communication between Milošević, on the one<br />

hand, and Martić and Babić, on the other, the Trial Chamber has considered relevant evidence<br />

of, inter alia, Witness JF-039, Milan Babić, and documentary material.<br />

2293. Witness JF-039, a Serb from Croatia, 4895 testified that in late November or early<br />

December 1990, a group of expert technicians from the Serbian DB came to Knin and at this<br />

time, Martić was provided with a direct telephone line to Stanišić. 4896 Simatović was also<br />

present at this visit in Krajina. 4897 According to the witness, around this time “it was<br />

4891 Indictment, para. 15 (a).<br />

4892 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 187, 669-681.<br />

4893 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 192, 682-684.<br />

4894 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, paras 187-189, 192, 668-682, 729, 734.<br />

4895 P978 (Witness JF-039, witness statement, 12 September 2003), p. 1, paras 1, 5, 23; P977 (Witness JF-039,<br />

prior testimony), pp. 1958-1959.<br />

4896 P978 (Witness JF-039, witness statement, 12 September 2003), paras 22, 26; P977 (Witness JF-039, prior<br />

testimony), pp. 1992, 1996, 2085-2086; Witness JF-039, T. 7345.<br />

4897 P977 (Witness JF-039, prior testimony), pp. 1991-1992; Witness JF-039, T. 7345.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 821<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!