31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49311<br />

receiving their salaries from the RSK. 4810 The witness, who moved to Ilok on 2 November<br />

1991, following his appointment as police commander of Ilok, produced a document<br />

addressed to Vlastimir Đorđević, the chief of the police administration in the MUP of Serbia,<br />

to inform him about food supplies for the Ilok police station and asked who the relevant<br />

invoices should be delivered to. 4811<br />

2253. In view of the evidence of Knežević, Witness C-015, Witness JF-015, and Witness JF-<br />

032, the Trial Chamber finds that some time between August and September 1991, Radovan<br />

Stojičić a.k.a. Badža took over the command of the SBWS TO and police. The Prosecution<br />

submits that TO commander Badža was paid by the Serbian MUP while he was in the SAO<br />

SBWS and that his later links with Stanišić show that he was subordinated to him. 4812 The<br />

Trial Chamber has addressed these submissions in chapter 6.4.4 where it concluded that the<br />

evidence in this respect lacked sufficient foundation and that even if there were some<br />

connections between the TO commander and the Serbian DB, it was not sufficient to show<br />

that the Accused controlled the TO. In making these findings, the Trial Chamber has further<br />

considered the evidence set out in this chapter. The Trial Chamber further notes the evidence<br />

of Milomir Kovačević about rumours that Badža was subordinate to the Serbian DB, but in<br />

view of its assessment of this witness’s credibility addressed in chapter 2, it will not rely on<br />

his evidence in this respect.<br />

2254. Based on the evidence received, 4813 the Trial Chamber finds that sometime between<br />

mid-August and late September 1991, volunteers from the Serbian MUP SJB arrived to the<br />

SBWS. They were followed by policemen from the Serbian MUP SJB, 4814 under the<br />

command of Veljko Bogunović, who joined the SBWS TO. Dušan Knežević, Nebojša<br />

Bogunović, and Trajković, all from the MUP SJB provided infantry and specialist training to<br />

SBWS TO and police members. Miodrag Zavišić, also from the Serbian MUP SJB and the<br />

SJB police officers were charged with establishing additional police stations in SBWS.<br />

Stanišić, although not participating in the discussion, was present at the Belgrade meeting<br />

4810 D371 (Dušan Knežević, witness statement, 17 August 2011), para. 34.<br />

4811 D371 (Dušan Knežević, witness statement, 17 August 2011), para. 28; Dušan Knežević, T. 13387-13389;<br />

D381 (Document addressed to the Police Administration about the logistics of the Ilok police station produced<br />

by Dušan Knežević, 20 <strong>May</strong> 1992).<br />

4812 Prosecution Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012, para. 162; T. 20195, 20221.<br />

4813 The evidence of Nebojša Bogunović, Dušan Knežević, Gvozden Gagić, Witness JF-029, Witness JF-032,<br />

and Witness JF-015.<br />

4814 The Trial Chamber notes that Nebojša Bogunović testified that the policemen came from the Krajina MUP.<br />

In view of the evidence received in this respect from other witnesses, in particular that these police officers came<br />

from Croatia, the Trial Chamber considers that Bogunović erred in his assessment of who had sent these police<br />

units to SBWS.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 807<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!