31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

493<strong>30</strong><br />

is unable to conclude that the Accused directed and organized the financing of the SAO<br />

Krajina TO.<br />

2205. In relation to the arming of the SAO Krajina Police, the Trial Chamber first recalls that<br />

in chapter 6.6.2, it observed the possibility that in the process of the SAO Krajina Police<br />

formation, Martić and his forces received weapons from the depots of the reserve police force,<br />

the JNA and the TO, in Serbia and in Krajina, as well as through smugglers. It further recalls<br />

its finding in the same chapter that Stanišić arranged weapons for Martić and that Simatović<br />

oversaw the delivery of arms and ammunition to Martić between December 1990 and <strong>May</strong> or<br />

June 1991.<br />

2206. As to the arming of the SAO Krajina Police after its formal establishment on 29 <strong>May</strong><br />

1991, based on the evidence of Witness JF-006, the Trial Chamber finds that certain members<br />

of the SAO Krajina Police were armed with weapons they received during their training at the<br />

Golubić camp. In this respect, the Trial Chamber recalls its finding in chapter 6.3.2 in relation<br />

to the Golubić camp, that from late April or early <strong>May</strong> to July 1991, Simatović brought, inter<br />

alia, supplies and equipment to the camp. In the same chapter, the Trial Chamber further<br />

allowed for the reasonable possibility that the SAO Krajina Police provided equipment,<br />

weaponry, and funding for the Golubić camp. In view of the foregoing and taking into<br />

consideration its findings made above, the Trial Chamber considers that the the weapons<br />

distributed to trainees at the Golubić camp could have been supplied by the Accused, could<br />

have have originated from the JNA and TO depots in Serbia and in Krajina, or could have<br />

come from both sources. The Trial Chamber has further considered Milan Babić’s statement<br />

that in August 1991, Stanišič arranged weapons for Banija and Kordun, but in the absence of<br />

any further evidence in this respect, it is unable to conclude that these weapons were received<br />

by the SAO Krajina Police or TO members.<br />

2207. The Trial Chamber has further reviewed the evidence of Vatroslav Stanićić that in<br />

early July 1991, the SAO Krajina Police was poorly equipped, armed, and trained, but in view<br />

of its findings on the arming and training of the police made in chapters 6.6.2 and 6.3.2, as<br />

well as further evidence reviewed above, it does not consider that this evidence gives a full<br />

picture of the situation on the ground, where, at least some members of the SAO Krajina<br />

Police were trained and equipped. Considering the other evidence before it, 4670 the Trial<br />

4670 In particular D118 (Letter to Mladić by Colonel Smiljanić, 5 October 1994), D680 (A letter from the 2nd<br />

Military District Command to the 9th Corps Command regarding the replenishment of the TO and police units<br />

with equipment, Colonel General Milutin Kukanjac, 7 April 1992), D681 (An order issued by the Command of<br />

the 608th TSB of the Federal Secretariat of National Defence to the 2nd Military District Command, dated 23<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 788<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!