31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49332<br />

Defence, concluded that problems in the Krajinas must be resolved within the framework of<br />

the Federal SUP, and whether the Serbian MUP would be involved, was to be seen. 4666<br />

2196. Furthermore, the Trial Chamber has reviewed several documents concerning requests<br />

and orders for unhindered passage for the RSK and the Serbian MUP officials. 4667<br />

2197. In relation to the training of the SAO Krajina Police, the Trial Chamber first recalls its<br />

finding in 6.3.2 in relation to the Golubić camp, that from late April or early <strong>May</strong> to July<br />

1991, the Accused directed and organized the training of the SAO Krajina Police and the<br />

SAO Krajina TO members at the Golubić camp. The training, which on average lasted<br />

approximately 20 days, was of a military character and included weapons and ambush<br />

training, as well as the treatment of POWs and the treatment of civilians in armed conflict.<br />

2198. Having considered the evidence reviewed in this chapter, the Trial Chamber observes<br />

that between 1992 and 1995, members of the SAO Krajina Police received further training,<br />

including at the Golubić camp which was converted into a police school in early 1992.<br />

However, the Trial Chamber has not received any evidence indicating that the Serbian DB or<br />

the Accused played a role in directing and organizing training of the SAO Krajina Police or<br />

TO during these years. Evidence on the school operating under the patronage of the Serbian<br />

MUP does not, in and of itself, implicate the Serbian DB. Consequently, the Trial Chamber is<br />

unable to conclude that the Accused directed and organized training for the SAO Krajina<br />

Police or TO members after July 1991.<br />

2199. As to the financing of the SAO Krajina Police, the Trial Chamber first recalls that in<br />

chapter 6.6.2 it observed that the SAO Krajina Police received money through private<br />

donations. The Trial Chamber further recalls its findings in the same section that on at least<br />

two occasions between December 1990 and <strong>May</strong> or June 1991, Simatović personally brought<br />

bags of cash to Milan Martić in Knin and that with the financial support of Stanišić, Martić set<br />

up at least two new Serb police stations in the Krajina after January 1991.<br />

2200. The Trial Chamber will now move to the specific findings on financing of the SAO<br />

Krajina Police following its formal establishment on 29 <strong>May</strong> 1991. On the basis of the<br />

evidence of Witness DST-043 and Witness JF-039, the Trial Chamber observes that after its<br />

4666 P2351 (Records of the 190th Session of the SFRY Presidency, 11 March 1992), pp. 1-2, 39-41.<br />

4667 P1551 (Observations related to prior evidence documents shown to of Witness JF-041, 13 October 2010), pp.<br />

1-2; P1554 (Safe conduct order for Uroš Pokrajac, signed by Milan Martić, 16 February 1993); P1560 (Letter to<br />

Serbian MUP on a border crossing, from Željko Škovrlj, 20 July 1994); P2581 (Order from Milan Martić of the<br />

RSK MUP in Knin to the RSK SUP, signed for receipt by Stevo Kresović, <strong>30</strong> March 1993); P2666 (Letter from<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 786<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!