31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49350<br />

assistance of the Serbian DB to the SAO Krajina Police. The Trial Chamber further considers<br />

that the accounts of Milan Babić and Witness JF-039 corroborate each other on important<br />

points, including on that concerning the involvement of the Serbian DB in supporting Martić.<br />

2148. In so far as the Stanišić Defence and the Simatović Defence allege that Simatović went<br />

to the SAO Krajina to collect intelligence and monitor the activities of Captain Dragan, 4551 the<br />

Trial Chamber has concluded in chapter 6.3.2 that it did not consider it a reasonable<br />

interpretation of the evidence before it that Simatović’s role in Knin was limited to<br />

conducting surveillance and monitoring activities.<br />

2149. On the whole, the Trial Chamber considers that the evidence received is reliable,<br />

mutually reinforcing and consistent with the Adjudicated Facts.<br />

2150. In relation to the parallel structure of power in the Krajina, the Trial Chamber<br />

considers that Bosnić’s lack of knowledge about the existence of the structure does not, as<br />

such, refute the evidence to the contrary. Having regard to the central position of Babić in the<br />

government, which gave him a better overview of the situation in the Krajina than Bosnić<br />

could have had at the time, the Trial Chamber considers Babić’s evidence in this regard to be<br />

reliable and corroborated by Witness JF-038’s hearsay evidence about Martić being<br />

influenced by Belgrade. On this point, the Trial Chamber further notes that the head of the<br />

SAO Krajina DB, Dušan Orlović, later became a member of the Serbian DB Unit a.k.a. the<br />

Red Berets. The Trial Chamber will now move to its findings on the specific evidence<br />

received in relation to the SAO Krajina Police.<br />

2151. Based on the evidence before it, 4552 the Trial Chamber finds that around August 1990,<br />

local Serb civilians and reserve police officers began erecting barricades and roadblocks in<br />

and around Knin. At the same time, Milan Martić distributed weapons to police officers in<br />

Golubić, and he later became the leader of the barricade movement with its headquarters in<br />

Golubić. The Trial Chamber considers that Mile Bosnić’s lack of knowledge in relation to<br />

Martić’s role at the barricades does not negate the evidence of others, who personally<br />

witnessed these events.<br />

2152. The Trial Chamber has reviewed the evidence before it, in particular that of Witness<br />

JF-039 that Martić took control over the police in the Krajina by mid-November 1991, and the<br />

evidence of Josip Josipović and Witness C-1211 that Serbs started joining Martić’s forces<br />

4551 Simatović Defence Final Trial Brief, 14 December 2012 (Confidential), paras 185-192, 227-229, 336;<br />

Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012 (Confidential), paras 298, <strong>30</strong>1, 314.<br />

4552 In particular the evidence of Witness JF-039, Milan Babić, Witness JF-038, and Mile Bosnić.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 768<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!