31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

49351<br />

2144. The Stanišić Defence submits that Witness JF-039 is at times moving into “the realm<br />

of fantasy”, and that his evidence is internally inconsistent and confusing, as well as<br />

inconsistent with Milan Babić’s evidence. 4546 No other evidence supports the chain of supply<br />

from Simatović to Martić alleged by Witness JF-039. 4547 It further submits that contrary to<br />

Babić’s theory of the continuous support of the Accused to the Krajina, Witness JF-039<br />

testified that Simatović only delivered assistance up until the first half of 1991. 4548<br />

2145. The Stanišić Defence submits that Babić contradicted himself in his evidence in<br />

relation to the “parallel structure theory” which, in his view, came into existence in August<br />

1990, but only began its activities in April 1991. 4549 Against his theory on all-encompassing<br />

DB logistical support for Serbs in Krajina after mid-1991, he himself stated that in 1992, the<br />

police in Krajina was financed by the Serbian MoD. 4550<br />

2146. In relation to the reliability of Milan Babić’s evidence, the Trial Chamber recalls its<br />

considerations in chapter 3.1.7. With regard to the Defence allegations, the Trial Chamber<br />

considers Babić’s evidence about the existence of the parallel structure of power to be<br />

internally consistent. Furthermore, it does not consider that when stating that the Serbian<br />

MoD financed the Krajina police in 1992 and thereafter, Babić contradicted his general<br />

statements about the parallel structure’s support for the SAO Krajina police before and after<br />

1992. The Trial Chamber considers the evidence of Milan Babić to be generally reliable. As<br />

to any possible minor inconsistencies therein, the Trial Chamber will take them into<br />

consideration when making its findings.<br />

2147. In relation to the reliability of Witness JF-039’s evidence, the Trial Chamber has<br />

already partly addressed the submissions of the Defence in chapter 6.3.2. Furthermore, the<br />

Trial Chamber considers that despite some minor inconsistencies, the evidence of the witness<br />

is logical and coherent. As to the evidence of Witness JF-039 that Simatović brought<br />

assistance to Martić only up to mid-1991, in the context of the witness’s overall evidence, the<br />

Trial Chamber understands this to refer to personal visits of Simatović in the Krajina. It does<br />

not interpret it as referring to a complete discontinuation of the support for the SAO Krajina<br />

Police, in particular in terms of financial assistance. Consequently, the Trial Chamber does<br />

not consider that this evidence contradicts that of Babić, on the allegedly continuous<br />

4546 Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012, paras 339-344, 376; T. 20274-20275, 20278.<br />

4547 Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012, paras 374-381.<br />

4548 Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012, paras 342-343.<br />

4549 Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012, paras 339-340.<br />

4550 Stanišić Defence Final Trial Brief, 17 December 2012, paras 339-340.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 767<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!