31.10.2014 Views

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

30 May 2013 - ICTY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

49484<br />

1799. On 10 April 1992, Commander Major General Savo Janković of the 17th Corps<br />

Command requested the 2nd Military District Command to engage in air strikes with fighter<br />

bombers on Kula in Zvornik at 9 a.m. on 11 April 1992, so as to neutralise attacks on units<br />

defending the bridges on the Drina river. 3611<br />

1800. The Trial Chamber recalls its findings that Arkan’s men, a local paramilitary group<br />

acting under Mirko Blagojević, the TO, and the Bijeljina SDS took control of Bijeljina town<br />

by 4 April 1992, in chapter 3.3.1, and that on 8 April 1992, a combination of Serb forces – the<br />

police, the TO, the JNA, and the SDG – attacked Zvornik town, in chapter 3.8.2. Based on the<br />

testimony of Witness JF-025, Jovan Dimitrijević, Witness JF-026, and Witness JF-057<br />

reviewed above, and evidence in chapters 3.3.1 and 3.8.2, the Trial Chamber finds that whilst<br />

Arkan and the SDG operated in concert with other forces during the take-overs of Bijeljina<br />

and Zvornik, the evidence is inconclusive regarding the SDG’s operational subordination.<br />

Whilst the Trial Chamber has received evidence demonstrating that Biljana Plavšić may have<br />

been involved in directing the take-over of Zvornik and, possibly, Bijeljina, the Trial<br />

Chamber finds this evidence to be too vague and, thus, inconclusive. Similarly, while Colonel<br />

Tačić ordered Arkan to leave the area after the take-over of Zvornik, the Trial Chamber<br />

cannot infer from this alone that the SDG was directed by the JNA. The Trial Chamber has<br />

not received evidence with regard to the Accused directing the involvement of the SDG in<br />

Bosnia-Herzegovina in 1992. The Trial Chamber finds that without further evidence, the mere<br />

fact that the Accused were involved with the SDG at a later stage does not affect this finding.<br />

Banja Luka 1995<br />

1801. When referring to the Banja Luka operations in the finding below, the Trial Chamber<br />

relies on the Prosecution’s narration of the events unravelling in the greater area of Banja<br />

Luka in the fall of 1995. In its Pre-trial Brief, the Prosecution describes the Banja Luka<br />

operation as a concerted operation between the Serbian MUP, the SDG, the VRS, and the<br />

MUP of the Bosnian-Serb Republic, aiming to prevent the “fall” of Banja Luka and to secure<br />

the corridor between the Bosnian-Serb Republic and Serbia. 3612<br />

1802. According to the Indictment, the Accused directed the involvement of the SDG in the<br />

Banja Luka operations. 3613 In its Final Trial Brief, the Prosecution submits that during<br />

3611 D177 (Cable from Major General Savo Janković requesting air strikes in Zvornik municipality, 10 April<br />

1992).<br />

3612 Prosecution Pre-Trial Brief, 2 April 2007, para. 168<br />

3613 Indictment, para. 7. The Indictment alleges that the Accused directed the involvement of the special units of<br />

the Republic of Serbia DB in particular operations in Croatia and Bosnia-Herzegovina.<br />

Case No. IT-03-69-T 634<br />

<strong>30</strong> <strong>May</strong> <strong>2013</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!