31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The greater height and density <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana swards than those <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>es has been considered to make it a fire hazard<br />

(Liebert 1996), although no directly comparative quantitative data appears to have been published. Grasslands dominated by T.<br />

triandra are green in summer, while N. neesiana ceases to grow in summer after producing a large quantity <strong>of</strong> stems in spring<br />

and early summer. There are therefore good a priori reasons to suggest that N. neesiana might alter fire regimes by changing the<br />

seasonal distribution <strong>of</strong> fuel. Comparisons <strong>of</strong> total biomass <strong>of</strong> invaded and natural T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands during a range <strong>of</strong><br />

seasons could easily determine this.<br />

Four threatened plant species are listed by ARMCANZ et al. (2001) as threatened by N. neesiana: Sunshine Diuris Diuris<br />

fragrantissima D.L. Jones and M.A. Clem., Small Milkwort Comesperma polygaloides, Plains Riceflower Pimelea spinescens<br />

and Button Wrinklewort Rutidosis leptorhynchoides. More details for D. fragrantissima are provided by Webster et al. (2004)<br />

and Vidler (2004) and for R. leptorynchoides by Humphries and Webster (2003). However the national strategic plan<br />

(ARMCANZ et al. 2001) fails to “identify the biodiversity at risk in a manner that can be used to deliver effective management”<br />

and contains no specific section on impact minimisation (Downey and Cherry 2005 p. 42).<br />

In summary, very little is known about the impact <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana on biodiversity and what little is ‘known’ appears to be largely<br />

based on simple correlative observations without adequate scientific study. Suggestions that the impacts are major or<br />

catastrophic appear to be founded on the rapid proliferation and high cover <strong>of</strong> the plant in native <strong>grass</strong>lands under conditions that<br />

have been poorly documented and in which the supposed impacts may be due to disturbance. Possibly N. neesiana is basically<br />

similar to a native <strong>grass</strong> and replacement <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>es by N. neesiana may have little biodiversity impact. In the following<br />

section the atttributes <strong>of</strong> the temperate native <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong> are examined and the effects <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong><br />

disturbances on N. neesiana and the native <strong>grass</strong>es are discussed in more detail.<br />

92

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!