Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The greater height and density <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana swards than those <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>es has been considered to make it a fire hazard<br />
(Liebert 1996), although no directly comparative quantitative data appears to have been published. Grasslands dominated by T.<br />
triandra are green in summer, while N. neesiana ceases to grow in summer after producing a large quantity <strong>of</strong> stems in spring<br />
and early summer. There are therefore good a priori reasons to suggest that N. neesiana might alter fire regimes by changing the<br />
seasonal distribution <strong>of</strong> fuel. Comparisons <strong>of</strong> total biomass <strong>of</strong> invaded and natural T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands during a range <strong>of</strong><br />
seasons could easily determine this.<br />
Four threatened plant species are listed by ARMCANZ et al. (2001) as threatened by N. neesiana: Sunshine Diuris Diuris<br />
fragrantissima D.L. Jones and M.A. Clem., Small Milkwort Comesperma polygaloides, Plains Riceflower Pimelea spinescens<br />
and Button Wrinklewort Rutidosis leptorhynchoides. More details for D. fragrantissima are provided by Webster et al. (2004)<br />
and Vidler (2004) and for R. leptorynchoides by Humphries and Webster (2003). However the national strategic plan<br />
(ARMCANZ et al. 2001) fails to “identify the biodiversity at risk in a manner that can be used to deliver effective management”<br />
and contains no specific section on impact minimisation (Downey and Cherry 2005 p. 42).<br />
In summary, very little is known about the impact <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana on biodiversity and what little is ‘known’ appears to be largely<br />
based on simple correlative observations without adequate scientific study. Suggestions that the impacts are major or<br />
catastrophic appear to be founded on the rapid proliferation and high cover <strong>of</strong> the plant in native <strong>grass</strong>lands under conditions that<br />
have been poorly documented and in which the supposed impacts may be due to disturbance. Possibly N. neesiana is basically<br />
similar to a native <strong>grass</strong> and replacement <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>es by N. neesiana may have little biodiversity impact. In the following<br />
section the atttributes <strong>of</strong> the temperate native <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong> are examined and the effects <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong><br />
disturbances on N. neesiana and the native <strong>grass</strong>es are discussed in more detail.<br />
92