31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In New Zealand, Hurrell et al. (1994) measured a soil seed bank (to about 10 cm depth) under old established stands <strong>of</strong> 2,600-<br />

35,000 seeds m -2 , with an average density <strong>of</strong> 10,500 seeds m -2 , <strong>of</strong> which approximately 70% were cleistogenes, with few or no<br />

aerial seeds in some samples. Tetrazolium testing showed 58% viability <strong>of</strong> cleistogenes and 86% <strong>of</strong> aerial seeds, with a total<br />

average viability <strong>of</strong> 67%. In pastures at Waipawa, New Zealand, the seed bank was composed almost entirely <strong>of</strong> cleistogenes<br />

(Slay 2002c), with a mean <strong>of</strong> 6437 ±3437 viable cleistogenes and 660 ±1289 viable panicle seeds m -2 (Slay 2001). Bourdôt and<br />

Hurrell (1992) found 4000-18,000 viable seeds m -2 under pasture, 99% in the top 25 mm and 0% below 100 mm, on a silt loam<br />

at Marlborough. Viability (as determined by tetrazolium treatment) <strong>of</strong> seed buried in polyproylene mesh bags for 6 years in this<br />

soil increased with increasing depth <strong>of</strong> burial, 24% <strong>of</strong> seed remaining viable at 25 cm depth, 17% at 5 cm, 5% at 2.5 cm and<br />

0.1% for soil at the surface (Bourdôt and Hurrell 1992). Analysis <strong>of</strong> decay data suggested that an increaing proportion <strong>of</strong> buried<br />

seed survived at increasing depth indefinitely in a state <strong>of</strong> dormancy, whereas no surface seed was viable after 1 year (Bourdôt<br />

and Hurrell 1992). However there are doubts about the reliability <strong>of</strong> tetrazolium tests for determination <strong>of</strong> seed viability (Puhar<br />

and Hocking 1996). Seeds that are hard when pressed between the thumb nail and forefinger are “almost certainly viable”<br />

(Bourdôt 1988).<br />

In pastures in New Zealand in the absence <strong>of</strong> seed input, annual depletion rates <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank were 38% when “regularly”<br />

mown to prevent panicle seeding, 61% with repeated glyphosate applications, and between 66% and 77% for single to repeated<br />

annual cultivations (Bourdôt and Hurrell 1992).<br />

Smaller seed banks have been described in New England Tablelands pastures by Gardener (1998) who made direct counts <strong>of</strong><br />

loose seeds in the soil to 4 cm depth, with all seeds considered to be <strong>of</strong> panicle origin (Gardener et al. 2003b p. 622). Under<br />

dense infestations 681-11,307 viable seeds m -2 were found. If basal cleistogenes, contained in tiller bases and not loose in the<br />

soil, are included, the estimated total seed numbers were increased by 35.5% (Gardener and Sindel 1998) or 20% (Gardener et<br />

al. 2003b). Within N. neesiana tussocks 44.1% <strong>of</strong> seeds were panicle seeds and 55.9% basal cleistogenes (Gardener et al.<br />

2003b).<br />

In native <strong>grass</strong>lands and <strong>grass</strong>y woodlands in the Melbourne area the viable seed bank appears to be substantially smaller. Seed<br />

banks at Iramoo Wildlife Reserve determined by Bram Mason (unpublished) were up to 7000 m -2 (Robinson 2003 2005).<br />

Beames et al. (2005) assessed panicle seed banks in areas <strong>of</strong> high quality native <strong>grass</strong>land at Laverton and Grey Box woodland at<br />

Melbourne Airport that had been subject to a range <strong>of</strong> different management regimes to control N. neesiana. They separated the<br />

seeds into four categories: filled, unfilled (caryopsis absent), successful germinants (germinating at the time <strong>of</strong> sampling) and<br />

unsuccessful germinants. At Laverton a maximum seed bank (seed <strong>of</strong> all categories) <strong>of</strong> ca. 2200 m -2 was found, however unfilled<br />

and unsucessfully germinating seed accounted for ca. 90% <strong>of</strong> seed. In areas subject to N. neesiana management, seed bank<br />

numbers did not exceed 1000 m -2 , with similar proportions in each seed category, except for filled seed, which comprised a<br />

much smaller proportion in two <strong>of</strong> the managed areas. At Melbourne Airport the maximum seed bank exceeded 7000 m -2. The<br />

unburnt, unsprayed treatement had a significantly smaller seed bank than most <strong>of</strong> the managed areas. Significantly more filled<br />

seed was found outside managed areas, which in most cases had zero filled seed. One major conclusion was that most <strong>of</strong> these<br />

differences were the result <strong>of</strong> reduced seed input due to ongoing herbicide treatment, which possibly reduces the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

viable seed produced and seed persistence. The study indicates that the seed bank in non-agricultural areas is much less<br />

persistent and easier to deplete than had previously been assumed.<br />

Hocking (2005b) reported even lower levels in infestations subject to herbicidal control in southern Victora: 80% unviable seed. He suggested that the size <strong>of</strong> the seed bank may be widely variable on a<br />

regional basis and between sites managed for agriculture and conservation, and that agents in the soil at some sites may be<br />

destroying a high proportion <strong>of</strong> seed. Hocking (in Iaconis 2006b) reported no differences in the soil seed banks <strong>of</strong> agricultural<br />

and natural areas, but high variability between sites, and >50% <strong>of</strong> the seeds unfilled.<br />

In New England pastures, dramatically better fruiting in wetter years (Gardener et al. 1996a) led to major addition to the seed<br />

bank (e.g. 41.6% <strong>of</strong> seeds incorporated in 1996), but in drier years input was only sufficient to maintain existing seed bank<br />

numbers or inadquate to maintain pre-existing levels (Gardener et al. 2003b).<br />

Rates <strong>of</strong> decline <strong>of</strong> the seed bank determined for New England pastures without input after 3 y, were 4676 to 1323 seeds m -2 in<br />

bare plots and 4585 to 1507 seeds m -2 in vegetated plots, with no significant effect <strong>of</strong> ground cover on decline, and a predicted<br />

decline without input (based on a fitted exponential decay curve) to 10 seeds m -2 after 12.4 y (Gardener et al. 1999, Gardener et<br />

al. 2003b). The seed bank longevity was found to be >6 y (Gardener and Sindel 1998) and half-life 1.3 y (Gardener et al.<br />

2003b). There is anecdotal evidence <strong>of</strong> gemination from continuously bared ground after 6 y (Gardener and Sindel 1998).<br />

Where soil cracking occurs in summer, as in the clays <strong>of</strong> the Victorian basalt plains, seed dropped in late spring and early<br />

summer will certainly move into the soil to greater depths than was sampled in the two <strong>Australia</strong>n studies, which both assumed a<br />

similar depth pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> the seed bank to that found on a silt loam in New Zealand by Bourdôt and Hurrell (1992). This may be<br />

especially significant since viability <strong>of</strong> seed increases with depth <strong>of</strong> burial (Bourdôt and Hurrell 1992). Grasses that produce<br />

relatively few large seeds “<strong>of</strong>ten emerge from seed located deeper in the soil …where … water is available for a longer time …<br />

and many have high seedling growth rates” (Groves and Whalley 2002).<br />

Germination and seedling recruitment<br />

Seed dormancy<br />

The panicle seed have dormancy - the tight lemma may provide a barrier to water and gas exchange and mechanically constrain<br />

the embryo (Gardener and Sindel 1998) - and appear to have an after-ripening requirement after falling from the plant <strong>of</strong><br />

between 3 and 12 months for maximum germination (Gardener et al. 1999, Gardener et al. 2003b). The overlapping margins <strong>of</strong><br />

the lemma and its toughness make it difficult to break open to expose the caryopsis, a feature also <strong>of</strong> Austrostipa spp. (Barkworth<br />

2006). Puhar (1996) found by staining with tetrazolium chloride that 93.5% <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana seeds collected in the previous<br />

summer were viable, but in laboratory tests less than 2% germinated under a day/night cycle <strong>of</strong> 30/20ºC and 14/10 hr light.<br />

Removal <strong>of</strong> the lemma enabled 100% germination within three days under the same conditions.<br />

63

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!