31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 4. Distribution <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana in New South<br />

Wales (National Herbarium <strong>of</strong> New South Wales<br />

2009).<br />

<strong>Australia</strong>n Capital Territory<br />

Published information about early records <strong>of</strong> the <strong>grass</strong> in the ACT are scanty. Gardener (1998) dated the first record to 1960. The<br />

ACT <strong>Weeds</strong> Working Group (2002 p. 2) vaguely noted that it was “known to have occurred in the ACT for some time, but was<br />

not considered a species <strong>of</strong> concern until the late 1990s”. Vickery et al. (1986 p. 81) considered it was “now spreading” in the<br />

ACT, and examined material from Burbong, Black Mountain, Commonwealth Gardens in Canberra, and O’Connor. Berry and<br />

Mulvaney (1995) did not list the species as a significant weed in the ACT: it was not considered a “widespread or dominant”<br />

environmental weed, nor a “common weed” <strong>of</strong> any major habitat type except <strong>grass</strong>lands and road verges, and was not recorded<br />

from 40 or more 2.5’ x 2.5’ grid cells (c. 3.5 x 4.5 km), nor known to be dominant over an area <strong>of</strong> > 30 x 30 m. The weed<br />

database at that time recorded zero locations for it in the ACT. In fact the species was not properly recognised in the ACT in this<br />

period, and its presence was being overlooked (Sarah Sharp pers. comm. 11 October 2006). Berry and Mulvaney did note<br />

however (1995 Vol. 2 Appendices p. 261) that it was a weed <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>lands in Canberra, “observed as a dominant in a small patch<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land in the Barton area ... also common along the bicycle path at Yarramundi” (at the western end <strong>of</strong> Lake Burley<br />

Griffin).<br />

Eddy et al. (1998) considered it common in the ACT. Bruce (2001) surveyed 39 sites in the ACT including natural <strong>grass</strong>lands,<br />

parks and road verges in rural, urban and periurban areas and found N. neesiana to be widespread. It was most common in urban<br />

and peri-urban areas subject to mowing and was present at all urban and peri-urban sites investigated, but at only 67% <strong>of</strong> rural<br />

sites. Abundance data suggested that the invasion in the older urban areas was <strong>of</strong> longest standing and at a more advanced stage.<br />

Lowest levels <strong>of</strong> abundance were found on agricultural land and grazed areas (whether or not managed for agriculture).<br />

Further surveys from 2000 to 2002 (ACT Weed Working Group 2002, ?Sharp 2002) revealed expansion <strong>of</strong> known infestations at<br />

numerous sites, plus numerous previously unrecorded patches and linear infestations along primary, secondary and semi-rural<br />

roadsides leading outwards from major infestations. The Tuggeranong Valley contained the most noteworthy severe new<br />

infestations. N. neesiana was found to be dominant in numerous areas in inner Canberra including most suburban nature strips<br />

and roadsides, and around Parliament House. ACT Government (2005) recorded that it had spread dramatically in abundance<br />

and distribution in the previous 10 years. The highest abundances in the ACT were in the central city and at Belconnen, with<br />

lower abundances in the Jerrabomberra and Majura districts, Gunghalin, but was absent from sites examined in the Tuggeranong,<br />

Tidbinbilla and Namadgi districts.<br />

South <strong>Australia</strong><br />

The first known collection in South <strong>Australia</strong> was at Lucindale in the South East on 18 November 1988, where, according to J.P.<br />

Jessop <strong>of</strong> the Adelaide Herbarium, it ‘did not seem to be causing any trouble’ (McLaren et al. 1998). Gardener (1998) mapped a<br />

1988 record in the vicinity <strong>of</strong> Mallala (north <strong>of</strong> Adelaide). Gardener et al. (1996a) mentioned its presence in the Adelaide Hills,<br />

and Gardener (1998) dated the first Adelaide area record as 1989. By 2000 it was recorded from the South East (Thorp and<br />

Lynch 2000) and was known from the Okagparinga Valley by late 2000 (Obst and How 2004). Infestations at Belair National<br />

Park were also identified. Field surveys in spring-summer 2003 enabled the mapping <strong>of</strong> all known infestations in Adelaide-<br />

Fleurieu Peninsula (Iaconis 2006a). 53 infestations in the Mt. L<strong>of</strong>ty Ranges, Fleurieu Peninsula and greater Adelaide regions<br />

totalling 14.0 hectares had been recognised up to December 2003, including Modbury (moderate to heavy, 0.07 ha), Adelaide<br />

Parklands (5 plants removed by hand), Clarendon (one site, 0.02 ha, low density, grazed pasture) and Wirrina (several sites,<br />

13.77 ha) (Obst and How 2004). Further surveys in 2004 located a few additional sites. During 2003-2005 the original survey<br />

area was extended to include Randall Park and adjoining roads and railway infrastructure to Belair National Park, but no new<br />

infestations were discovered (Iaconis 2006a). Jessop et al. (2006) recorded its presence in the Northern L<strong>of</strong>ty region (near<br />

Bundaleer), Southern L<strong>of</strong>ty region and the South East.<br />

Queensland<br />

The presence <strong>of</strong> N. neesiana in Queensland may have been first recorded in published literature by Mallet and Orchard (2002).<br />

Michael Hansford (in Iaconis 2003) noted its presence in “southern” parts <strong>of</strong> the State, in the Darling Downs. Extensive<br />

surveying for N. neesiana was undertaken in 2005 and 2006 including roadside mapping in Clifton and Warwick Shires, with a<br />

delimiting survey planned for the whole <strong>of</strong> the eastern Darling Downs (Iaconis 2006a). As <strong>of</strong> October 2006 infestations were<br />

restricted to Clifton, Warwick and Cambooya Shires, and property management plans had been finalised for all known<br />

infestations (Phil Maher, Queensland Department <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources and Mines, in Iaconis (2006b)). Infestations were<br />

concentrated in the Darling Downs, with some along the Condamine River, and approximately 100 ha were known to be infested<br />

by 2007 (Snell et al. 2007). The largest infestation was at Clifton Showgrounds and polo field where anecdotal evidence suggests<br />

it may have been present since at least 1977 and have given rise to the other infestations (Snell et al. 2007). Additional<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!