31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fossorial vertebrates are or were once a feature <strong>of</strong> the indigenous fauna <strong>of</strong> temperate <strong>grass</strong>lands worldwide. Darwin (1845 p. 51)<br />

reported that “considerable tracts” <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land <strong>of</strong> the Maldonada region in Uruguay were undermined by the extensive shallow<br />

burrowing <strong>of</strong> the root-feeding Tucotuco Ctenomys brasiliensis Blainville (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae), while the commonest<br />

mammal in <strong>grass</strong>lands between the Rio Negro and Bahía Blanca in Argentina was the burrowing Agouti or Mara (Dolichotis<br />

patagonum Zimmerman) (as Cavia patagonica) (Caviidae). Another burrowing rodent, the Viscacha (or Plains Vizcacha)<br />

Lagostomus maximus (Desmarest) (Chinchillidae), larger than the Agouti, lives in large groups in the pampas between the<br />

Uruguay and Rio Rivers, makes deep, multi-chambered burrows with large soil mounds, known as viscacheras, and forages at<br />

night on <strong>grass</strong>es and herbs. It is considered a”key ecosystem engineer” whose grazing and burrowing activities change the<br />

structure and composition <strong>of</strong> the vegetation over extensive areas (Villarreal et al. 2008 p. 701). This speices remained abundant<br />

at least until the early 1970s (Soriano et al. 1992). Rheas were abundant in the <strong>grass</strong>lands <strong>of</strong> Bahía Blanca, and live on “roots and<br />

<strong>grass</strong>” (Darwin 1845 p. 89). Burrowing mammals have been implicated in significant changes in microtopography (soil mounds)<br />

in Argentina (Noble 1993). The effects <strong>of</strong> L. maximus activities cascade through the ecosystem, and include altered plant<br />

biomass distribution, nutrient cycling (primarily by deposition <strong>of</strong> faeces and urine in the burrow), nutrient content <strong>of</strong> plants and<br />

fire regimes (Villarreal et al. 2008).<br />

Other small mammals in the regions where N. neesiana is found include a group <strong>of</strong> Necromys mice (Rodentia: Cricetidae) <strong>of</strong><br />

open areas (D’Elía et al. 2008). N. lactens (Thomas) is found in high altitude <strong>grass</strong>lands (over 1500 m) in north-western<br />

Argentina and southern Bolivia including Catamarca, south Jujuy and Tucuman; N. obscurus onthe Atlantic coast <strong>of</strong> Uruguay<br />

and in areas around the La Plata River and N. lasiurus is very widely distributed including southern Buenos Aires Province<br />

(D’Elía et al. 2008). The oldest Necromys fossils are 3.5-4 million years old from southern Buenos Aires Province and the group<br />

probably radiated in the Pampean region during the late Pliocene (D’Elía et al. 2008).<br />

The biopedturbation activities <strong>of</strong> mammals now extinct or rare in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands probably played a critical role<br />

in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> forb diversity (Reynolds 2006). The mechanisms include alteration to the spatial distribution and cycling<br />

<strong>of</strong> soil nutrients and water infiltration (Garkaklis et al. 2003). Bettongs, potoroos, bandicoots, bilbies and rodents are amongst the<br />

most important digging and burrowing groups (Garkaklis et al. 2003). Bilbies are powerful burrowers, prefering s<strong>of</strong>t soils such<br />

as sand dunes (Noble 1993). Reptiles, including goannas, may also be important, and the feral animal diggings, including those<br />

<strong>of</strong> rabbits, may function in a similar fashion to those <strong>of</strong> native vertabrates (James et al. 2009).<br />

Bettongia species probably mostly feed on underground fungi and may be opportunistically insectivorous and omnivorous<br />

(Seebeck and Rose 1989). They sometimes bury and store seed, “which are eaten later, <strong>of</strong>ten after germination” (Seebeck and<br />

Rose 1989 p. 721). The Rufous Bettong Aepyprymnus rufescens (Gray) is primarily rhizophagous buts eats fungi throughout the<br />

year (Seebeck and Rose 1989). Foraging activities <strong>of</strong> Bettongia penicllata Gray for hypogeous fungi commonly cover the ground<br />

with small diggings <strong>of</strong> a range <strong>of</strong> different sizes and ages. In plan they are elliptial with a spoil heap at one end and a steep wall<br />

to a depth <strong>of</strong> 10-15 cm at the other. These excavations accumulate litter, leading to concentrations <strong>of</strong> buried fungal hyphae which<br />

become water repellent lenses in the soil after gradual infill <strong>of</strong> the excavations. The increased water infiltration in the<br />

excavations is the probable cause <strong>of</strong> decreased available nitrate and sulfur found in the soil <strong>of</strong> old, simulated diggings, while<br />

decreased ammonium may be due to rapid nitrification (Garkaklis et al. 2003).<br />

The Burrowing Bettong Bettongia lesueur is considered to be the most fossorial <strong>of</strong> the potoroids (Strahan) and constructed<br />

warrens up to 30 m in diameter that could contain over 100 entrances or were simple structures with only one or two entrances,<br />

the former sometimes associated with rock caps and the latter sometimes on plains (Noble 1993, Noble et al. 2007). It is “a<br />

powerful burrower ... capable <strong>of</strong> penetrating the underlying rock” (Noble 1993 p. 60) and its activities probably significantly<br />

promoted landscape heterogeneity and plant diversity (Noble et al. 2007). B. lesueur “may have helped maitain vast areas as<br />

<strong>grass</strong>land by eliminating shrubs” (Noble et al. 2007 p. 335).<br />

Among the native mammals still present in some temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n native <strong>grass</strong>lands, the biopedturbation activites <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Short-beaked Echidna may be the most significant. Much <strong>of</strong> the foraging activity <strong>of</strong> the Echidna requires digging to obtain<br />

invertebrates, and the animals shelter in temporary digs and prepared tunnels (Menkhorst 1995c). Nursery burrows are shallow<br />

and 1-1.5 m long (Menkhorst 1995c) while foraging disturbances range from nose-poke holes, through shallow scrapes to deep<br />

digs and extensive bulldozing (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007). In semi-arid woodlands with a <strong>grass</strong>y understorey this soil<br />

disturbance has been found to make a large contribution to landscape patchiness (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007). The foraging<br />

pits accumulated greater quantities <strong>of</strong> plant litter than undug areas, have moister and more porous soil, are cooler and have a<br />

different suite and greater abundance <strong>of</strong> soil micro-arthropods than the surface soil. Contrary to expectations, increased litter in<br />

pits did not result in increases in total or active C, total N and available P, although the N was probably largely immobilised in<br />

the litter. Ultimately, echidna pits probably influence plant germination and establishment (Eldridge and Mensinga 2007).<br />

The hip hole diggings <strong>of</strong> Macropus spp. are constructed so as to assist the animals to cool, and are generally located in the shade<br />

<strong>of</strong> trees or shrubs (Eldridge and Rath 2002), so may be <strong>of</strong> little significance in <strong>grass</strong>lands.<br />

Biopedturbation by invertebrates may be more important than that <strong>of</strong> vertebrates. Ants and earthworms are probably the most<br />

important groups. Ants are a prominent feature <strong>of</strong> temperate south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>lands. Many species construct surface<br />

mounds <strong>of</strong> excavated material around their nest entrances, associated with tunnels that may descend well under the surface.<br />

When the effects <strong>of</strong> their activity is quantified over the long term they can be viewed as ecological engineers whose activities<br />

restructure the landscape, generate heterogeneity, and affect soil structure and porosity, the distribution <strong>of</strong> soil nutrients and<br />

regeneration <strong>of</strong> the flora (Richards 2009). The vertical tunnels <strong>of</strong> Underground Grass Caterpillars Oncopera fasciculatus<br />

(Walker) (Hepialidae) reach a depth <strong>of</strong> up to 23 cm at maturity, depending on the ease with which the soil can be dug, and the<br />

excavated soil is deposited around the tunnel entrance and on the larval feeding runways (Madge 1954). Many other insects have<br />

larvae which live beneath the soil surface and contribute to biopedturbation. Earthworm activity in temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

<strong>grass</strong>lands can also be substantial. However there appear to be no published studies <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> bioturbation by invertebrates<br />

in temperate native <strong>grass</strong>lands.<br />

129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!