Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Fire effects on weeds<br />
Moore (1993 p. 351) argued that Themeda <strong>grass</strong>lands remained “remarkably stable” under regimes <strong>of</strong> marsupial grazing and<br />
periodic burning, and if otherwise undisturbed were “not invaded by introduced species”. Fire results in temporary increases in<br />
nutrient availability and this fluctuation <strong>of</strong> resources may enhance invasion by exotic plants (Hobbs 1989). In general burning <strong>of</strong><br />
south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>n native <strong>grass</strong>lands promotes post-fire colonising plants, most <strong>of</strong> which are exotic annuals that recruit<br />
from a large soil seed bank (Lunt 1990b, Lunt and Morgan 2002). However Stuwe and Parsons (1977) found a smaller<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> the vascular flora consisted <strong>of</strong> alien species at regularly burnt (railway) sites than in grazed or unmanaged T.<br />
triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, while Dodd et al. (2007) found that sites burnt less frequently had higher exotic seed banks, and considered<br />
regular burning to be detrimental to the exotics. Burning <strong>of</strong> some degraded T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands has been reported to lead to<br />
major increases in cover and density <strong>of</strong> exotic annuals, which then slowly decline (Lunt 1990b 1990c, Morgan 1998d). Scarlett’s<br />
(1994) view was that regular burning <strong>of</strong> sites with a long history <strong>of</strong> grazing and trampling rarely has any major impact on exotic<br />
annuals, an effect he linked to the poor re-establishment <strong>of</strong> the cryptogam crust.<br />
Fire is <strong>of</strong>ten considered to provide advantages in reducing weed populations, but may promote or inhibit particular weed species<br />
or functional groups. Fire is demonstrably an effective tool to greatly reduce the cover <strong>of</strong> exotic invasive <strong>grass</strong>es when the<br />
invasives are not fire adapted, and to restore native plant cover (e.g. MacDougall and Turkington 2007). In temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands spring fires might reduce or prevent seed set in exotic annual <strong>grass</strong>es (Stuwe 1986) but late autumn burning promotes<br />
their regeneration along with Romulea rosea (L.) Eckl. (Iridaceae) (Lunt 1990c). Burning can reduce the density <strong>of</strong> the exotic<br />
<strong>grass</strong>es Briza maxima, Cynosurus echinatus L., Lolium rigidum Gaudin, L. perenne and Bromus hordeaceus in T. triandra<br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands but promotes a range <strong>of</strong> others including Aira and Vulpia spp. (Lunt 1990c, McDougall 1989, Adair 1995).<br />
As with the native plants, seasonality <strong>of</strong> the fire may determine the effect on particular exotics (see Morgan 1996), while the<br />
impacts on propagule production and seed bank levels are obviously important factors. According to Adair (1995) no clear<br />
evidence was then available that the season <strong>of</strong> burning has a significant effect on introduced <strong>grass</strong>es and forbs. Exotics are likely<br />
to be advantaged if they account for a high proportion <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank, which is generally the case (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995,<br />
Morgan 1998c, Dodd et al. 2007). Robertson (1985) found similar densities <strong>of</strong> exotic annuals after autumn and spring burns at<br />
Gellibrand Hill. Stuwe (1994) among others argued that biomass-reduction burning now facilitates the growth <strong>of</strong> both native and<br />
exotic plants, while Lunt (1990b), based on seed bank studies at Derrimut, argued that burning is likely to promote exotics more,<br />
or at least as much as natives. Dodd et al. (2007) argued that exotic dominance <strong>of</strong> the seed bank is partly due to removal <strong>of</strong> fire,<br />
which along with exotic dominance in the surrounding landscape matrix, is likely to result in increased weediness <strong>of</strong> remnants.<br />
Decisions about the desirability <strong>of</strong> burning need to be based on an understanding <strong>of</strong> the contents <strong>of</strong> the soil seed bank and the<br />
phenology <strong>of</strong> the above ground cover at each site in order to predict whether a burn would be beneficial for the flora.<br />
Determining an appropriate fire regime even at a single small site can thus becomes prohibitively difficult. Most native<br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands contain a mix <strong>of</strong> weeds with different life strategies, so fire cannot be used as a general tool to favour the native<br />
species (Lunt 1990c).<br />
Stuwe (1994) warned that burning <strong>of</strong> areas with a N. neesiana seed bank should not be undertaken unless follow up herbicide<br />
treatment could be undertaken. However there appear to have been no studies on the specific effects <strong>of</strong> fire timing and intensity<br />
on N. neesiana populations in native <strong>grass</strong>lands. No information appears to be available about the comparable fuel loads <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands with and without N. neeesiana, so it is difficult to speculate about whether N. neesiana infestations increase or<br />
decrease the frequency and intensity <strong>of</strong> fires.<br />
In relation to vascular plants <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>lands, there is a general consensus that the interaction between fire and grazing is the<br />
major factor involved in the abundance <strong>of</strong> most native species, including threatened taxa, and that low fire frequency is<br />
detrimental to most species (Scarlett and Parsons 1993). Frequent burning (a fire every 2-5 years) is necessary to maintain<br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands dominated by T. triandra, but other Victorian <strong>grass</strong>y ecosystems (E. camaldulensis and E. melliodora <strong>grass</strong>y<br />
woodlands in the Grampians and Sandplain Grassland in the Mallee) appear not to require burning to maintain their vascular<br />
plant diversity (Lunt 1991). In T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>lands, long intervals between fires results in loss <strong>of</strong> forb diversity (Stuwe and<br />
Parsons 1977, Lunt 1990c, Lunt and Morgan 1999). Morgan (1998c) found no correlation between seed bank species richness<br />
and fire history for five <strong>grass</strong>lands in the Victorian volcanic plains. However fires do not generally lead to significant seedling<br />
recruitment <strong>of</strong> native plants (Henderson 1999, Lunt and Morgan 2002), possibly because <strong>of</strong> severe depletion <strong>of</strong> the seed bank<br />
resulting from prior affects <strong>of</strong> long-term livestock grazing on seed production (Lunt 1990b 1990c). T. triandra is more sensitive<br />
to grazing shortly after fire (Groves and Whalley 2002).<br />
Effects <strong>of</strong> fire on animals<br />
Combinations <strong>of</strong> positive and negative effects <strong>of</strong> fire also occur with other organisms. Fire can change the abundance, range<br />
(spatial and temporal), fecundity and dietary choice <strong>of</strong> other organisms by altering the provision <strong>of</strong> food, shelter and habitat<br />
(Low 2002). Fire directly results in the elimination <strong>of</strong> many animal populations, although many sedentary species survive<br />
underground.<br />
According to Yen (1995 1999) the effects <strong>of</strong> fire on temperate <strong>Australia</strong>n <strong>grass</strong>land invertebrates were unknown, while Driscoll<br />
(1994) noted that they were ‘yet to be investigated’. Studies from other ecosystems tend to be equivocal, with few lessons for<br />
<strong>grass</strong>lands (Driscoll 1994). Edwards (1994) argued that fire <strong>of</strong>ten causes local extinction, but recolonisation from unburnt areas<br />
is usual, so in a situation where an invertebate is dependent on a community that is scarce and highly fragmented, recolonisation<br />
is <strong>of</strong>ten impossible. This appears to be the case with Synemon spp. (Edwards 1994) and with xanthorhoine moths (McQuillan<br />
1999), although with organisms like Synemon that spend a major part <strong>of</strong> their lifecycle underground, the precise timing <strong>of</strong> the<br />
fire with respect to the above-ground stages would appear to be critical.<br />
Removal <strong>of</strong> dense cover by fire and the creation <strong>of</strong> open ground will radically alter temperatures at the ground surface. Lunt<br />
(1995a) quantified temperature differences between the canopy surface in T. triandra <strong>grass</strong>land, the ground surface temperature<br />
and soil temperatures at 3 cm depth, in areas where the canopy was closed and in open gaps from July to April. The canopy<br />
provided excellent insulation with temperatures on the surface similar to those in the soil. Temperatures in gaps were generally<br />
123