31.10.2014 Views

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

Literature review: Impact of Chilean needle grass ... - Weeds Australia

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

palatability, digestibility and nutritional value, coincided with increases in ungulates with hypsodont characters, i.e. highcrowned,<br />

longer lasting teeth (Bouchenak-Khelladi et al. 2009).<br />

During the late Tertiary and the Pleistocene epoch <strong>of</strong> the Quaternary in <strong>Australia</strong> a wide range <strong>of</strong> herbivorous birds and<br />

mammals developed in association with the wide occurrence <strong>of</strong> <strong>grass</strong>land. These included the 2-3 tonne Diprotodon optatum,<br />

giant macropods Sthenurus, Procoptodon and Protemnodon, the small grazing diprotodon Palorchestes azael and open country<br />

flightless birds (Frith 1973, Hope 1994, Johnson 2009). But in all continents except Africa the open country megafauna largely<br />

became extinct during the late Pleistocene, and the grazing regimes were therefore completely changed, with major ecological<br />

repercussions (Johnson 2009). The <strong>Australia</strong>n herbivorous mammalian fauna was more severely affected than the Americas and<br />

Africa, losing almost all species over 100 kg in weight (Johnson 2009). Some 20 <strong>of</strong> the 50 <strong>Australia</strong>n species that disappeared<br />

were grazers, with Macropus spp. being the largest survivors (Jones 1999b). Loss <strong>of</strong> the megafauna due to aboriginal overkill, as<br />

argued by Flannery (1994) remains contentious, but the major role <strong>of</strong> hunting in the extinctions throughout the world now<br />

appears to be widely accepted (Johnson 2009). The extinctions appear to have occurred over a long period from 50-30 kybp for<br />

the larger species, through to c. 10 kybp for the smaller (Hope 1994). Kershaw et al. (2000) argued that people coexisted with<br />

the megafauna for many thousands <strong>of</strong> years, but conceded (pp. 502-503) that recent redating <strong>of</strong> significant fossil megafauna sites<br />

largely reduced the overlap, making it unlikely that climate or habitat change were to blame. Loss <strong>of</strong> the megafaunal grazers<br />

would have resulted in major change in the vegetation (Flannery 1994), particularly by reducing tree and shrub herbivory, as in<br />

African savannas (Hope 1994). Knowledge <strong>of</strong> megaherbivores indicate that they effectively acted as ecological engineers. Their<br />

extinction has likely led to the replacement <strong>of</strong> large areas <strong>of</strong> open vegetation with closed, woody formations, a decline in the<br />

heterogeneity <strong>of</strong> vegetation across a range <strong>of</strong> scales, increased fire, primarily due to increased fuel loads and possibly resulting in<br />

new areas <strong>of</strong> uniform <strong>grass</strong>land, and the decline <strong>of</strong> coevolved plants, including the species they dispersed or which had evolved<br />

defences against them (Johnson 2009).<br />

Grazing <strong>of</strong> sheep and cattle is now the major form <strong>of</strong> management in a large range <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>lands, notably in the <strong>Australia</strong>n<br />

Capital Territory (ACT Government 2005) and in many privately owned native pastures (particularly in southern NSW), and is a<br />

substitute for burning to reduce the biomass <strong>of</strong> dominant <strong>grass</strong>es (Stuwe 1994). Moderate or more intense grazing pressure can<br />

be more effective than fire in maintaining bare ground and the low biomass <strong>of</strong> dominant <strong>grass</strong>es required to maintain high<br />

diversity <strong>of</strong> indigenous annuals and prostrate species, but disadvantages the taller, upright herbs (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995). Native<br />

pastures near Armidale NSW ungrazed for 16 years had a species richness <strong>of</strong> only 20 species per 30 m 2 because <strong>of</strong> large <strong>grass</strong><br />

tussocks, dense <strong>grass</strong> litter and little bare ground, while areas grazed continuously by sheep at moderate to low stocking rates<br />

were much shorter, with small tussocks, little litter and abundant small bare areas, and had a diversity <strong>of</strong> 36 species (Trémont<br />

and McIntyre 1994). Based on experimental results from disturbance treatments Sharp (1997) recommended retention <strong>of</strong><br />

livestock grazing as a management regime in the ACT, particularly at sites with high diversity <strong>of</strong> small intertussock forbs. Thus<br />

it appears that sites that have been managed by livestock grazing for long periods will degrade if grazing is removed, but can be<br />

managed without significant biodiversity loss by continuing the established grazing regime.<br />

The effects <strong>of</strong> introduced livestock grazing on native <strong>grass</strong>lands are complex, being dependent, inter alia, on the grazer species,<br />

the intensity and duration <strong>of</strong> the grazing pressure, and interactions with other environmental and management factors<br />

(Kirkpatrick et al. 1995, Lunt 1995c, McIntyre et al. 1995, Aguiar 2005). Some <strong>of</strong> the most basic components <strong>of</strong> grazing impact<br />

in <strong>Australia</strong> have been poorly understood and await adequate investigation (Johnston et al. 1999). For instance conceptions <strong>of</strong><br />

what plants are important fodder have significantly changed historically. White (in the foreword in Leigh and Mulham 1965, p.<br />

v), commenting on the findings <strong>of</strong> pastoral research in the NSW Riverina, wrote that the pastoral research group had investigated<br />

“the question <strong>of</strong> which species are important at various seasons <strong>of</strong> the year. Often thirty or more species are available for<br />

selection and the extent to which the sheep exercises this opportunity is quite surprising. In many instances, in spite <strong>of</strong><br />

appearances, inconspicuous plants or rather unattractive shrubs are more important to sheep than was formerly believed”. Lack<br />

<strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> appropriate grazing regimes for natural <strong>grass</strong>land management continued into the period when <strong>grass</strong>land<br />

preservation became a cause célèbre: “Currently it is not known if it is preferable to maintain a continuous, light grazing regime<br />

or to graze intermittently, either lightly or heavily ... avoiding peak flowering and seeding times for native plants ... It may be<br />

that particular sites require different regimes, on the basis <strong>of</strong> the different species mix present, type <strong>of</strong> exotic infestation, drainage<br />

or other factors” (Sharp and Shorthouse 1996).<br />

One effect that was believed to result in the deterioration <strong>of</strong> native <strong>grass</strong>land as a productive pasture was depletion <strong>of</strong> soil P<br />

through the harvest <strong>of</strong> livestock and from continual removal <strong>of</strong> wool (Wadham and Wood 1950). However Groves et al. (2003a)<br />

considered nutrient addition from continuous grazing to be a major factor in historical changes in <strong>grass</strong>land species composition,<br />

initially due to increased nutrient mobilisation through soil disturbance and death <strong>of</strong> native plants, and increased returns from<br />

faeces and urine, later through the addition <strong>of</strong> fertiliser and the sowing <strong>of</strong> legumes. Grazing adds highly labile mineral N direct to<br />

the soil, leads to higher average plant tissue N concentrations, decreased root: shoot ratios and sometimes less efficient N-uptake<br />

(Wedin 1999). Deposition <strong>of</strong> urine and faeces also alters the cycling rates <strong>of</strong> other nutrients. Nutrient enrichment and soil<br />

compaction associated with livestock camps in native <strong>grass</strong>lands favours weeds (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995).<br />

Mammalian herbivore grazing impacts on patterns <strong>of</strong> recruitment, production and mortality <strong>of</strong> grazed and ungrazed species, on<br />

plant resource use and on resource availability. The most direct effect is removal <strong>of</strong> and damage to the above-ground parts that<br />

are consumed or trampled (Kirkpatrick et al. 1995), but the effects on plants that are not eaten may be among the largest impacts.<br />

Interactions between defoliation and release from competition can result in complex changes in structure and composition<br />

(McIntyre et al. 1995). Grazing alters the composition <strong>of</strong> the community by differentially altering the population density, genetic<br />

composition and structure <strong>of</strong> the component plants (Aguiar 2005) and by creating bare patches suitable for colonisation<br />

(McIntyre et al. 1995). It may also affect the structural diversity at the community level, although this possibility has been<br />

widely ignored (Aguiar 2005). Status as a <strong>grass</strong>land may be dependent on grazers that differentially destroy juvenile trees and<br />

shrubs, preventing reversion to woodland or shrubland (Hobbs and Heunneke 1992). The accessibility <strong>of</strong> perennating buds to the<br />

grazing animals is an important determinant <strong>of</strong> survival, so suvival <strong>of</strong> hemicryptophytes (with buds close to ground level) tend to<br />

decline only when grazing is intense (McIntyre et al. 1995). One immediate structural effect is that green leaf material becomes<br />

more concentrated close to the soil surface (Soriano et al. 1992). Plants that avoid grazing because <strong>of</strong> their small size or height<br />

114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!