02.11.2012 Views

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

Reduction and Elimination in Philosophy and the Sciences

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

174<br />

How do Moral Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples Figure <strong>in</strong> Moral Judgement? A Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>ian Contribution to <strong>the</strong> Particularism Debate — Matthias Kiesselbach<br />

“A promise must be kept”, “A promise must be kept, unless<br />

this would <strong>in</strong>volve <strong>the</strong> breach of a right”, “If a proposition<br />

constitutes a promise, that counts <strong>in</strong> favour of do<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

act to which it refers.” These, of course, are paradigm<br />

examples of moral pr<strong>in</strong>ciples.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> particularist <strong>in</strong>sistence that we can<br />

always devise scenarios <strong>in</strong> which follow<strong>in</strong>g a pr<strong>in</strong>ciple like<br />

<strong>the</strong>se turns out to be morally objectionable, we can now<br />

lean back. If, for example, <strong>the</strong> mentioned promise turns out<br />

to have been given under torture, we can agree that on<br />

this condition, <strong>the</strong> fact that some utterance constitutes a<br />

promise counts aga<strong>in</strong>st committ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> act <strong>in</strong> question,<br />

mak<strong>in</strong>g even <strong>the</strong> weakest of <strong>the</strong> three pr<strong>in</strong>ciples (<strong>the</strong> pro<br />

tanto pr<strong>in</strong>ciple) false. The important po<strong>in</strong>t to notice,<br />

however, is that we can take this situation as one of<br />

grammatical tension analogous to <strong>the</strong> case <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong><br />

old grammar surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> concept “light” was<br />

confronted with <strong>the</strong> new realities of <strong>in</strong>fra-red. In o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

words, we can see <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case an occasion for a controlled<br />

revision of <strong>the</strong> grammar surround<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> concept<br />

“promise”, i.e. a partial revision of its very mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong><br />

thus of our language game. On this view, both (UWG) <strong>and</strong><br />

(UWP) come out true. Every judgement <strong>in</strong>volves follow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

norms; but some judgements necessarily <strong>in</strong>volve redevelop<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong>m pragmatically. I want to submit to your<br />

consideration <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>sis that this is a suitable <strong>in</strong>terpretation<br />

for all moral problems.<br />

The ma<strong>in</strong> attraction of this view, besides yield<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

plausible account of tragic choices, is that it tells a story<br />

about moral discourse which very closely parallels an<br />

emerg<strong>in</strong>g consensus about science, accord<strong>in</strong>g to which<br />

<strong>the</strong> body of scientific knowledge <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>gs of<br />

scientific terms evolve toge<strong>the</strong>r.<br />

Literature<br />

Baker, G.P. <strong>and</strong> Hacker, P.M.S. 1985 Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>. Rules, Grammar<br />

<strong>and</strong> Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell<br />

Dancy, Jonathan 2004 Ethics without Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, Oxford: Oxford<br />

University Press<br />

Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>, Ludwig 2002 Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, London:<br />

Routledge [TLP]<br />

Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>, Ludwig 2001 Philosophical Investigations, Oxford:<br />

Blackwell [PI]<br />

Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>, Ludwig 1972 On Certa<strong>in</strong>ty, New York: Harper & Row<br />

[OC]<br />

Wittgenste<strong>in</strong>, Ludwig 1978 Remarks on Colour, Oxford: Blackwell<br />

[RC]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!