30.10.2014 Views

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

December 10, 1913.<br />

TEMPTATION BY B^RIENDS.<br />

'.Vlicn our Lord was in Upxer<br />

Galilee, he told his disciples of his<br />

apiroachlng death at the hands ot<br />

those wt.o hateu him without a cause.<br />

The disciples were offended by h's<br />

words, and Peter rebuked him. But<br />

J8::us turned, and said to Peter:<br />

•'Tliou art a stumbling-block unto<br />

me." So for ourselves, even our<br />

friends may prove stumbling-blocks<br />

in our path ot duty. ,<br />

In view of the elections last Fall,<br />

an earnest Prohibition editor, familiar<br />

with Covenanters and their zeal for<br />

Temperance, undertook to enlist the<br />

votes of our people for a Prohibition<br />

candidate for Judge. He sent out a<br />

A FAMILY<br />

PAPER.<br />

circular, addressed individually to<br />

members of our Church, arguing for<br />

spirit of unbounded Christian charity.<br />

their support. We discuss Men not<br />

tion. How can they admit to its fellowship<br />

those who avowedly disbe­<br />

At first glance, they seem to be fllled<br />

Measures, and Measures not Men, with the spirit of true evangelism, lieve and oppose the principles for<br />

and Measures and Men, but none may and to dissent from tbeir declarations which it stands?<br />

take up Men as suffl'cient in a Constitutional<br />

Government to embody<br />

is to invite censure and condemnation<br />

The above declarations, brotbeily<br />

as lacking in the spirit of charity, if<br />

and charitable as they sound, lo:e<br />

not wholly void cf likeness to Him<br />

proposed Reforms as if already enacted.<br />

The Constitution must be taken<br />

sight of the witnessing character of<br />

Who says, "Let him that heareth say, the Church. It was <strong>org</strong>ained by Christ<br />

that it might te a "pillar and ground<br />

as it is by "all Executive and Judicial<br />

officers"; and so the<br />

of the truth," that it might hold<br />

martyred<br />

President in his Inaugural address<br />

declared that he would execute the<br />

Fugitive Slave Law. The 'Covenant<br />

ol this Church declares: "We will<br />

pray and labor for the peace and welfare<br />

of our country, and for its<br />

reformation by a Constitutional recognition<br />

of God as the source of all power,<br />

of Jesus Christ as the Ruler of<br />

Nations, of the Holy Scriptures as<br />

the supreme rule, and of the true<br />

Christian religion; and we will continue<br />

to refuse to incorporate by any<br />

act, with the political body, until<br />

this blessed reformation has bsen seemed."<br />

We are persuaded that in<br />

ttese days of many and important Reforms,<br />

the dishonor done to "our Lord<br />

and His Christ'' by the Nation itself<br />

E D I T O R I A L P A G E<br />

JOHN W. PRITCHARD, Editor.<br />

Into our fellowship here on earth."<br />

These afPimations seem to us a bit<br />

too sweeiping. They can lead only tj<br />

one conclusion, and that is to bread<br />

churchitm cf the broadest guage.<br />

However plausible these utterances<br />

sound, however full of the spirit of<br />

'Cliristian brotherliness and charity,<br />

thcy p.oceed upon falee assumptions.<br />

One of these is, that those who maintain<br />

a separate ecclesiastical existence<br />

do so out of a sense of tlieir own<br />

superior holiness, as though they<br />

counted others unworthy to associate<br />

(We like tho old term.) We take the<br />

following editorial from the Cbristian<br />

Instructor of November IStli:<br />

"No denomination can afford io<br />

make the door of membership narrower<br />

than is the gate of heaven. Men<br />

whose faith in and devotion to Christ<br />

cannot be doubted, may be unwilling<br />

to give their assent to our Testimony,<br />

and where is the Session who would<br />

dare say. You may be good enough lo<br />

get into heaven, but you are not good<br />

enough to be a United Presbyterian?<br />

There is no justification for refusing<br />

to take into our fellowship here on<br />

earth those with whom we shall rejoice<br />

to associate in heaven."<br />

These words from the heart of a<br />

leading editorial in last week's United<br />

Presbyterian seem to breathe the<br />

'Come." How eould any session or denomination<br />

justify itself in excluding<br />

from membership any whom our Lord<br />

would receive into everlasting habita<br />

tions? , ,<br />

These statements occur in th;<br />

midst of a plea for the union of<br />

Churches, especially of those which<br />

are held apart by seemingly "small<br />

differences." The special plea is for<br />

tte union of "sister Presbytenan<br />

Churches." The argument seems to<br />

be, Christ will admit to His kingdom<br />

in heaven all sincere believers in<br />

these sister churches; therefore we<br />

should unite with them in <strong>org</strong>anic<br />

church fellowship in His kingdom<br />

here below. But why stop with "sister<br />

Presbyterian Churches?" Will not<br />

our Lord receive into His kingdom in<br />

with them. The question of personal<br />

\'(orthine£s does not enter into<br />

their course of action. Those who<br />

bear rule in the hou.e of God must<br />

have regard to the truth ol its teachings<br />

and the purity of its administra­<br />

forth to tne world the great plan of<br />

salvation in its purity and simplicity,<br />

and that it might declare to the world<br />

the kind of lives that reflect honor<br />

upon its great King and Head. How<br />

Irng, if a Church is indifferent as to<br />

the b3liefs and practicES of tho.^e<br />

whcm it receives into membership,<br />

will it have any power in winning the<br />

unsaved to Christ?<br />

AS TO INVESTMENT ADVERTIS­<br />

ING.<br />

A short time ago there occurred in<br />

this city) the failure of Hollins &<br />

the unwisdom of not heeding it, were<br />

not long since immovably flxed in our<br />

minds.<br />

Now as to investment advertising,<br />

the largest religious papers still accept<br />

it. The largest of all of them<br />

Leaps an announcement standing that<br />

they exercise care as to what investment<br />

advertisements they publish but<br />

wil! not be responsible to their subscribers<br />

for any losses, because each<br />

individual can better afford to suffer<br />

his or her own loss, than the paper<br />

can to make good the aggregate<br />

amount of all their losses. Some other<br />

leading religious papers accept<br />

such advertisements discriminatingly<br />

and let it go at that.<br />

For nearly two years our own policy<br />

has been not to accept any investment<br />

advertising at all, however<br />

solvent any enterprise may be at the<br />

time the advertising is offered to us.<br />

The wisdom of this position is justified<br />

by the fact that the advertising<br />

of the New York Real Estate Security<br />

Com.pany, published in other prominent<br />

religious papers, was not accepted<br />

by us. This policy curtails<br />

the paper's advertising receipts<br />

materially, but even so<br />

we expect to win the goal with our<br />

torch burning; and the interests of<br />

our readers are protected.<br />

This notice is not meant to reflect<br />

on the management of other religious<br />

papers. Their relations with their<br />

readers may not be so close as ours<br />

is. This notice is meant rather for<br />

bankers, and investment dealers, and<br />

other readers of The Christian. Nation,<br />

that they may understand our<br />

attitude and our reasons therefor.<br />

We have already noted the attendance<br />

of President Wilson and lesser<br />

officials on Mass in Washington, D.<br />

C., Thanksgiving Day. This was done<br />

in tte face of a protest by Protestant<br />

clergymen against the offlcial at­<br />

•Co., bankers and brokers, and financial<br />

agents for the Mexican government.<br />

Their assets were nominal and about the annual Pan-American<br />

mosphere they cjntend is thrown<br />

heaven all sincere believers who are<br />

found in Methodist, and Baptist, and<br />

Thanksgiving mass in St. Patrick's<br />

Lutheran, and Episcopal, and Reformed<br />

churches? Must we not go farthlars.<br />

The failure is attributed to President, cabinet, justices, the dip­<br />

their liabilities several million dol­<br />

Church, generally attended by the<br />

will remain our chief concern in our<br />

Testimony, making clear the duty of er and admit that He will receive into<br />

His heavenly kingdom all who<br />

Mexican complications, due to the lomatic corps and other dignitaries.<br />

Dissent.<br />

well knowrt conditions in that unhappy<br />

country. A week or so later the tion to attend this year and did at­<br />

President Wilson accepted an invita­<br />

truly believe in Him, though they be<br />

WITNESSING FOR THE TRUTH. found in unevangelical or Rorrfish<br />

tend. Rev. R. H. McKim, former president<br />

of the Episcopal house of depu­<br />

The United Presbyterian Church •churches? For who can deny that, New York| Real Estate Security Company<br />

went into a receiver's hands. This ties, is author of a resolution adopted<br />

has a Testimony. It embodies declarations<br />

for an inspired Pdalmo3y, such <strong>org</strong>anizations, and however company owned and occupied one of by the Episcopal, Lutheran, Baptist<br />

notwithstanding the corruptness of<br />

and for an Open Life. It sets forth greatly they pervert the simple Gospel,<br />

there have been and are within<br />

the finest offlce buildings on lower and Disciples of Christ clergy, and<br />

Restricted Communion.<br />

Broadway, and among their bondholders<br />

are some of the best known<br />

whlcIi 'protests "against the attempt<br />

The Seattle Assembly accepted the their pale many who truly love our<br />

invitation for 1913 to Atlanta (whe.e Lord Jesus, and whom He will welcome<br />

into His everlasting glory? But business men in New York. Their<br />

to convert our national Thanksgiving<br />

Day into a Roman Catholic festival<br />

in a service entirely out of har­<br />

there is no church building of their<br />

own), so as to gather with the Northern<br />

and Southern Presbyterian As­<br />

to take into our fellowship here 000. Their embarrassment is charged the day," and "for the purpose of<br />

"there is no justification for refusing liabilities are reported to be $25,000,- mony with the spirit and purpose of<br />

semblies. The Committee arranged on earth those with whom we shall<br />

to the recent, almost unprecendented glorifying the Roman Catholic<br />

for a joint Communion, carried out in rejoice to associate in heaven." Ergo,<br />

great enthusiasm. Now comes the let us tear down all lines of distinction<br />

between Presbyterianism, Pretate.<br />

These incidents demonstrate<br />

falling off in quick values of real es­<br />

Church and giving this service an official<br />

characterization it does not and<br />

•foice Of the people over the 'proposed<br />

cannot possess."<br />

Basis of Union between this Churcb lacy or Popery, and merge into one again the certain presence of the element<br />

of speculation and chance, in A genuine sensation of interest to<br />

and the Southern Church. The considerations<br />

are much as we had set any way bear the name of our Lord some measure, in every investment us all occurred in Philadelphia, last<br />

great cosmopolitan body all who in<br />

liefore us in 1890, also before and Jesus, for they all have in them those<br />

week. It is well known that between<br />

enterprise. There are things to be regretted<br />

in all lives, and our regret is<br />

after that date, in various forms. The with whom we shall rejoice to associate<br />

in heaven, and there is "no<br />

1788 and 1791, Robert Burns prepared<br />

question is not new. Sliall the Church<br />

some manuscript volumes, as be intended<br />

they finally should go to resile or not from her Testimony? justification for refusing to take them that the knowledge of this fact, and<br />

pos-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!