30.10.2014 Views

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

•THE! CHRISTIAN NATION.<br />

Vol. 59.<br />

E D I T O R I A L<br />

NEW YORK, OCTOBER i, 1913.<br />

REFORM NOTES.<br />

The second Sabbath of September was quite<br />

widely observed as a day ol prayer for the Bible<br />

in the Public Schools. The National Reform<br />

Winona Conference had this subject before it.<br />

The Christian Statesman for September says:<br />

"Dr, James S. Martin, ot Pittsburgh, introduced<br />

this year a new series of lectures on the subject<br />

of the Eible in the Public Schools. He made<br />

very clear and forcible the argument for Christian<br />

education as a preparation for American cit -<br />

zenship; and that the moral content of Christianity,<br />

as revealed in the Bible, is the one ethical<br />

standard recognized by the American conscience.<br />

He analyzed the forces opposed to Christ an<br />

teaching in the schools, enumerated the evils<br />

which would result from surrender to these<br />

forces, and flnallydeveloped a plan of moral warfare<br />

against these <strong>org</strong>anized influences. He also<br />

explained the attitude of the National Reform Association,<br />

declaring that the Association does not<br />

attack any race, nor any creed, nor any <strong>org</strong>anization;<br />

but that this Association is simply the<br />

defender of the Christian institutions of America,<br />

and that, as a consequence, it is at war with<br />

whatsoever race or creed presumes to attack<br />

these sacred institutions of liberty. The general<br />

line of argument pursued by Dr. Martin found instant<br />

veriflcatlon in the testimony of Dr.<br />

d'Aubigne as to the national results of the purely<br />

secular education in France.<br />

"Dr. Lyman Edwyn Davis introduced a new series<br />

of lectures this year under the general title<br />

of Literary Forces in Social Progress, the sp><br />

ciflc subjects including The Ethical Mission of the<br />

Drama, The .Moral Opportunity of the Daily<br />

Newspaper, The Moral Achievements of the<br />

Great Xovel, The Bible as the Oracle of the Great<br />

Books. He also delvered in the Assembly .Auditorium,<br />

his well-known lectures on The Kingdom<br />

of Common Sense and The 'City and the Man.<br />

"A new speaker was introduced to Winona<br />

this year in the person of Rev. Grant W. Sowe",<br />

who gave an instructive series ot lectures on the<br />

subject of Socal Uplift, delivering also his popular<br />

lectures entitled Abraham Lincoln the Lib<br />

erator, and The March of the Centuries."<br />

The Pittsburgh Board of Education has prescribed<br />

the i;se of Proverbs only in school reading,<br />

under the new Pennsylvania law requiring ten<br />

verses of the Bible to te read every morning—<br />

hardly an observance of the law in its scope.<br />

Tbe Roman Catholic influence let the law go<br />

through at Harrisburg in exchange for a repea^<br />

of the law vesting church property in the cong.-egation<br />

so far as to allow the titles to their<br />

churches to be vested according to Canon law.<br />

Now a small portion of the Bible is given to the<br />

Pittsburgh school children.<br />

The thirty-ninth annual meeting of the National<br />

Christian Association met at 10:30 a. m., July 2S,<br />

1913, in the X. C. A. building, 850 West Madison<br />

street, Chicago. The meeting was called to order<br />

by President Rev. E. B. Stewart, who requested<br />

Rev. T. C. McKnight to lead in prayer.<br />

ANNUAL REPORT OP BOARD.<br />

Tn 1912 the Boird appointed our President, Rev.<br />

L'. B. Stewart, to correspond with the managers priceless principles attained and profes,sed.<br />

of the Christian Citizens' Convention to be held To be more explicit, it may be said tha<br />

in Portland, .lune 29 to July 0, 1913, which was to<br />

according to the basis submitted by the com<br />

consider all subjects touching the welfare of our<br />

government and its citizens. The committee declined<br />

to allow the queston of the relation of asked to abandon its attitude as a definit<br />

mittee, the United Presbyterian Church i<br />

secret societies to civil government to be considered<br />

and avowed witness for the following prin<br />

on its platform, but Rev. J. W. McGaw, the ciples, which are set forth in its "Testi<br />

X'ational Secretary, suggested that the Association<br />

hold a meeting about the time of the Con­<br />

mony":<br />

vention, though not in connection with it. It was<br />

I. That the Book of Psalms is the onh<br />

finally decided to hold a convention in Seattle, manual of praise authorized by (x)d for us(<br />

Tacoma, and Portland, which was done with in solemn worship;<br />

gratifying results.<br />

2. That membership in any secret society<br />

is unwise and unlawful;<br />

"THE SEATTLE CONVENTION. (The writer.<br />

Rev. Thomas M. Slater, is the President of the<br />

Washington Christian Association opposed to secret<br />

3. That slaveholding is unlawful;<br />

so'cieties.—Editor). The holding of the re­<br />

4. That communion in sealing ordin­<br />

cent conventions in Seattle, Tacoma and Portland<br />

ances should be limited to those who are<br />

was of more than passing interest to the subject to the discipline of the Churc'h;<br />

friends ol the work on the Paciflc Coast, and in<br />

5. That in certain circumstances covenanting<br />

may be a duty, and that the obliga­<br />

some sense marked an epoch in the history of<br />

the cause here. * -^ •* vVe feel unable to adequately<br />

express our indebtedness to the Association<br />

for coming with these meetings to the Coast,<br />

tion of certain covenants may descend to<br />

posterity.<br />

and especially to Secretary Phillips for his services<br />

as an <strong>org</strong>anizer and director of the work,<br />

It may be urged that, according to a recent<br />

movement on the part of our Church,<br />

and to Dr. Blanchard for his inspiring and convincing<br />

addresses. May they both be spared for ordinary members of fhe Church are not required<br />

many years of like service and of blessedness<br />

to assent to all the ^positions just<br />

in the cause of their and out Master. To Mr. specified; but are only called upon to main-<br />

R. A. McCoy, of New Brighton, Pa., we are alsoindebted<br />

for collecting and forwarding a gener­<br />

Icain an orderly and teachable attitude in<br />

regard to them. I regret to say that such<br />

ous contribution to aid in this work. He and all<br />

who helped with him will surely be remembered is the illogical condition to wlhich we have<br />

in the Great Day of rewards."—Christian Cynosure,<br />

September, 1913.<br />

sunk by recent legislation. But so far as<br />

THE PROPOSED UNION.<br />

Rev. James Harpier, D. D., of Xenia, contributes<br />

to the Christian Instructor of September<br />

i6, the following:<br />

Fully three months have elapsed since our<br />

General<br />

A.ssembly ordeiried that the report<br />

of the jomt committee on union between our<br />

Church and the Presbyterian Church in the<br />

United States be printed and published. This<br />

order I do not regard as an "overture" in<br />

the technical 'sense, directing that a vote of<br />

the presbyteries for, or against, union be taken<br />

on the basis proposed by the committee<br />

aforesaid. I deem it to be simply a direction<br />

to the Church to- examine carefully the proposed<br />

basis so as to- be able to decide with<br />

intelligence wliether or not negotiation for<br />

union in this case should be prosecuted further.<br />

Having read with close attentioii the proposed<br />

basis of union, I feel constrained to<br />

say that, thijugh calm and courteous in style,<br />

it seems to me more like a form of capitulation<br />

dictated to a cowed and anxious garri-<br />

.son by a confident investing foe than a plan<br />

of union between two coequal parties. The<br />

language used in tbe document under notice<br />

is gentle and winning, but the course commended<br />

involves tbe surrender of one of the<br />

negotiating parties to the other and, what<br />

is of more importance, the abandonment of<br />

ministers, ruling elders, and licentiates are<br />

concerned, assent to the Testimony, as well<br />

as to the Westminster Confession and Catechism,<br />

is still required.<br />

Having indicated the surrender on our<br />

part which union on the basis now proposed<br />

would involve, let us consider wbat, if any,<br />

surrender is to be made by our friends of<br />

the Presbyterian Church in the United<br />

States.<br />

So far as I can discover, the only concessions<br />

which, according to the joint committee,<br />

'the Southern Church should be expected<br />

to make are these two, namely:<br />

I. That the United Presbyterian congregations<br />

entering into the union be allowed,<br />

without interference, to continue the use of<br />

the Psalms exclusively in lihe service of<br />

praise. In connection with this it is suggested<br />

that the united body should provide.<br />

or adopt, a proper version of the Psalms and<br />

even recommend the use of it, not, however,<br />

the exclusive use of it, as a manual of praise.<br />

2. That s/hould the union be achieved,<br />

the name of the resulting body shall be "The<br />

United Presbyterian Church of North America,"<br />

which is at present the legal title of<br />

our Churah.<br />

The first of these can hardly be called a<br />

concession, certainly not a great one, in view<br />

of the fact that neither of the two largest<br />

Presbyterian churches in ftihis country has<br />

ever questioned the propriety of using the<br />

Psalms in praising God. Indeed, it would<br />

appear from the "Digest" of Baird and<br />

Moore that in the early Presbyterian body<br />

(Continued on page 6.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!