S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org
S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org
S C R I B N E R ' S M A G A Z I N E Important ... - Rparchives.org
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
•THE! CHRISTIAN NATION.<br />
Vol. 59.<br />
E D I T O R I A L<br />
NEW YORK, OCTOBER i, 1913.<br />
REFORM NOTES.<br />
The second Sabbath of September was quite<br />
widely observed as a day ol prayer for the Bible<br />
in the Public Schools. The National Reform<br />
Winona Conference had this subject before it.<br />
The Christian Statesman for September says:<br />
"Dr, James S. Martin, ot Pittsburgh, introduced<br />
this year a new series of lectures on the subject<br />
of the Eible in the Public Schools. He made<br />
very clear and forcible the argument for Christian<br />
education as a preparation for American cit -<br />
zenship; and that the moral content of Christianity,<br />
as revealed in the Bible, is the one ethical<br />
standard recognized by the American conscience.<br />
He analyzed the forces opposed to Christ an<br />
teaching in the schools, enumerated the evils<br />
which would result from surrender to these<br />
forces, and flnallydeveloped a plan of moral warfare<br />
against these <strong>org</strong>anized influences. He also<br />
explained the attitude of the National Reform Association,<br />
declaring that the Association does not<br />
attack any race, nor any creed, nor any <strong>org</strong>anization;<br />
but that this Association is simply the<br />
defender of the Christian institutions of America,<br />
and that, as a consequence, it is at war with<br />
whatsoever race or creed presumes to attack<br />
these sacred institutions of liberty. The general<br />
line of argument pursued by Dr. Martin found instant<br />
veriflcatlon in the testimony of Dr.<br />
d'Aubigne as to the national results of the purely<br />
secular education in France.<br />
"Dr. Lyman Edwyn Davis introduced a new series<br />
of lectures this year under the general title<br />
of Literary Forces in Social Progress, the sp><br />
ciflc subjects including The Ethical Mission of the<br />
Drama, The .Moral Opportunity of the Daily<br />
Newspaper, The Moral Achievements of the<br />
Great Xovel, The Bible as the Oracle of the Great<br />
Books. He also delvered in the Assembly .Auditorium,<br />
his well-known lectures on The Kingdom<br />
of Common Sense and The 'City and the Man.<br />
"A new speaker was introduced to Winona<br />
this year in the person of Rev. Grant W. Sowe",<br />
who gave an instructive series ot lectures on the<br />
subject of Socal Uplift, delivering also his popular<br />
lectures entitled Abraham Lincoln the Lib<br />
erator, and The March of the Centuries."<br />
The Pittsburgh Board of Education has prescribed<br />
the i;se of Proverbs only in school reading,<br />
under the new Pennsylvania law requiring ten<br />
verses of the Bible to te read every morning—<br />
hardly an observance of the law in its scope.<br />
Tbe Roman Catholic influence let the law go<br />
through at Harrisburg in exchange for a repea^<br />
of the law vesting church property in the cong.-egation<br />
so far as to allow the titles to their<br />
churches to be vested according to Canon law.<br />
Now a small portion of the Bible is given to the<br />
Pittsburgh school children.<br />
The thirty-ninth annual meeting of the National<br />
Christian Association met at 10:30 a. m., July 2S,<br />
1913, in the X. C. A. building, 850 West Madison<br />
street, Chicago. The meeting was called to order<br />
by President Rev. E. B. Stewart, who requested<br />
Rev. T. C. McKnight to lead in prayer.<br />
ANNUAL REPORT OP BOARD.<br />
Tn 1912 the Boird appointed our President, Rev.<br />
L'. B. Stewart, to correspond with the managers priceless principles attained and profes,sed.<br />
of the Christian Citizens' Convention to be held To be more explicit, it may be said tha<br />
in Portland, .lune 29 to July 0, 1913, which was to<br />
according to the basis submitted by the com<br />
consider all subjects touching the welfare of our<br />
government and its citizens. The committee declined<br />
to allow the queston of the relation of asked to abandon its attitude as a definit<br />
mittee, the United Presbyterian Church i<br />
secret societies to civil government to be considered<br />
and avowed witness for the following prin<br />
on its platform, but Rev. J. W. McGaw, the ciples, which are set forth in its "Testi<br />
X'ational Secretary, suggested that the Association<br />
hold a meeting about the time of the Con<br />
mony":<br />
vention, though not in connection with it. It was<br />
I. That the Book of Psalms is the onh<br />
finally decided to hold a convention in Seattle, manual of praise authorized by (x)d for us(<br />
Tacoma, and Portland, which was done with in solemn worship;<br />
gratifying results.<br />
2. That membership in any secret society<br />
is unwise and unlawful;<br />
"THE SEATTLE CONVENTION. (The writer.<br />
Rev. Thomas M. Slater, is the President of the<br />
Washington Christian Association opposed to secret<br />
3. That slaveholding is unlawful;<br />
so'cieties.—Editor). The holding of the re<br />
4. That communion in sealing ordin<br />
cent conventions in Seattle, Tacoma and Portland<br />
ances should be limited to those who are<br />
was of more than passing interest to the subject to the discipline of the Churc'h;<br />
friends ol the work on the Paciflc Coast, and in<br />
5. That in certain circumstances covenanting<br />
may be a duty, and that the obliga<br />
some sense marked an epoch in the history of<br />
the cause here. * -^ •* vVe feel unable to adequately<br />
express our indebtedness to the Association<br />
for coming with these meetings to the Coast,<br />
tion of certain covenants may descend to<br />
posterity.<br />
and especially to Secretary Phillips for his services<br />
as an <strong>org</strong>anizer and director of the work,<br />
It may be urged that, according to a recent<br />
movement on the part of our Church,<br />
and to Dr. Blanchard for his inspiring and convincing<br />
addresses. May they both be spared for ordinary members of fhe Church are not required<br />
many years of like service and of blessedness<br />
to assent to all the ^positions just<br />
in the cause of their and out Master. To Mr. specified; but are only called upon to main-<br />
R. A. McCoy, of New Brighton, Pa., we are alsoindebted<br />
for collecting and forwarding a gener<br />
Icain an orderly and teachable attitude in<br />
regard to them. I regret to say that such<br />
ous contribution to aid in this work. He and all<br />
who helped with him will surely be remembered is the illogical condition to wlhich we have<br />
in the Great Day of rewards."—Christian Cynosure,<br />
September, 1913.<br />
sunk by recent legislation. But so far as<br />
THE PROPOSED UNION.<br />
Rev. James Harpier, D. D., of Xenia, contributes<br />
to the Christian Instructor of September<br />
i6, the following:<br />
Fully three months have elapsed since our<br />
General<br />
A.ssembly ordeiried that the report<br />
of the jomt committee on union between our<br />
Church and the Presbyterian Church in the<br />
United States be printed and published. This<br />
order I do not regard as an "overture" in<br />
the technical 'sense, directing that a vote of<br />
the presbyteries for, or against, union be taken<br />
on the basis proposed by the committee<br />
aforesaid. I deem it to be simply a direction<br />
to the Church to- examine carefully the proposed<br />
basis so as to- be able to decide with<br />
intelligence wliether or not negotiation for<br />
union in this case should be prosecuted further.<br />
Having read with close attentioii the proposed<br />
basis of union, I feel constrained to<br />
say that, thijugh calm and courteous in style,<br />
it seems to me more like a form of capitulation<br />
dictated to a cowed and anxious garri-<br />
.son by a confident investing foe than a plan<br />
of union between two coequal parties. The<br />
language used in tbe document under notice<br />
is gentle and winning, but the course commended<br />
involves tbe surrender of one of the<br />
negotiating parties to the other and, what<br />
is of more importance, the abandonment of<br />
ministers, ruling elders, and licentiates are<br />
concerned, assent to the Testimony, as well<br />
as to the Westminster Confession and Catechism,<br />
is still required.<br />
Having indicated the surrender on our<br />
part which union on the basis now proposed<br />
would involve, let us consider wbat, if any,<br />
surrender is to be made by our friends of<br />
the Presbyterian Church in the United<br />
States.<br />
So far as I can discover, the only concessions<br />
which, according to the joint committee,<br />
'the Southern Church should be expected<br />
to make are these two, namely:<br />
I. That the United Presbyterian congregations<br />
entering into the union be allowed,<br />
without interference, to continue the use of<br />
the Psalms exclusively in lihe service of<br />
praise. In connection with this it is suggested<br />
that the united body should provide.<br />
or adopt, a proper version of the Psalms and<br />
even recommend the use of it, not, however,<br />
the exclusive use of it, as a manual of praise.<br />
2. That s/hould the union be achieved,<br />
the name of the resulting body shall be "The<br />
United Presbyterian Church of North America,"<br />
which is at present the legal title of<br />
our Churah.<br />
The first of these can hardly be called a<br />
concession, certainly not a great one, in view<br />
of the fact that neither of the two largest<br />
Presbyterian churches in ftihis country has<br />
ever questioned the propriety of using the<br />
Psalms in praising God. Indeed, it would<br />
appear from the "Digest" of Baird and<br />
Moore that in the early Presbyterian body<br />
(Continued on page 6.)