30.10.2014 Views

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• FY 20<strong>11</strong>/2012 Final CDBG/Home Allocations<br />

• Extension <strong>of</strong> Hours <strong>of</strong> Sale <strong>of</strong> Alcoholic Beverages on Sundays<br />

• Receipt <strong>of</strong> the Preliminary Estimated Taxable Values<br />

• National Flood Insurance Community Rating System<br />

• 2010 Census<br />

• Red, White, and Boom Over North Brevard<br />

xxx<br />

Mayor Tulley advised the <strong>City</strong> Manager would be hosting a small reception for retiring<br />

Water Resource Director Raynetta Marshall on Thursday, June 16, 20<strong>11</strong> and hoped<br />

<strong>Council</strong> Members would attend.<br />

CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT<br />

xxx<br />

<strong>City</strong> Attorney’s Report - <strong>City</strong> Attorney Severs provided a written report.<br />

Deputy <strong>City</strong> Attorney Broome highlighted as followed:<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> Bar Rule 4-4.2 “No Contract Rule”<br />

On December 10, 2010, the <strong>Florida</strong> Bar Board <strong>of</strong> Bar Governors adopted Ethics Opinion<br />

09-1. <strong>The</strong> Opinion concluded that a lawyer may not communicate with government<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers, directors or employees who were directly involved or whose acts may be<br />

imputed to the governmental entity in a represented nature about the subject matter <strong>of</strong> the<br />

representation. <strong>The</strong> fundamental principle underlying Rule 4-4.2 entitled,<br />

“communication with persons represented by counsel” commonly known as the “No<br />

Contact Rule” was that a lawyer may not communicate with the represented person<br />

without the consent <strong>of</strong> the other person’s lawyer. <strong>The</strong> stated rationale behind that rule<br />

was to prevent interference with attorney/client relationship and to prevent a lawyer from<br />

persuading a represented person to act or make statements, disclosures or taking a<br />

position contrary to the government’s interest.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Opinion concluded that an attorney must obtain the consent <strong>of</strong> the governmental<br />

lawyer prior to communicating with the governmental <strong>of</strong>ficers, directors or managers, as<br />

well as employees who were directly involved in the matter. <strong>The</strong> bar or prohibition<br />

extends to public <strong>of</strong>ficers or employees whose acts or omissions were imputed to the<br />

agency.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Ethics Opinion cautioned lawyers that communicating directly with governmental<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficers and employees on matters unrelated to specific legal representation must not be<br />

used as a vehicle to evade requirements <strong>of</strong> obtaining consent by “closing eyes to the<br />

obvious”.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!