Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• FY 20<strong>11</strong>/2012 Final CDBG/Home Allocations<br />
• Extension <strong>of</strong> Hours <strong>of</strong> Sale <strong>of</strong> Alcoholic Beverages on Sundays<br />
• Receipt <strong>of</strong> the Preliminary Estimated Taxable Values<br />
• National Flood Insurance Community Rating System<br />
• 2010 Census<br />
• Red, White, and Boom Over North Brevard<br />
xxx<br />
Mayor Tulley advised the <strong>City</strong> Manager would be hosting a small reception for retiring<br />
Water Resource Director Raynetta Marshall on Thursday, June 16, 20<strong>11</strong> and hoped<br />
<strong>Council</strong> Members would attend.<br />
CITY ATTORNEY’S REPORT<br />
xxx<br />
<strong>City</strong> Attorney’s Report - <strong>City</strong> Attorney Severs provided a written report.<br />
Deputy <strong>City</strong> Attorney Broome highlighted as followed:<br />
<strong>Florida</strong> Bar Rule 4-4.2 “No Contract Rule”<br />
On December 10, 2010, the <strong>Florida</strong> Bar Board <strong>of</strong> Bar Governors adopted Ethics Opinion<br />
09-1. <strong>The</strong> Opinion concluded that a lawyer may not communicate with government<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers, directors or employees who were directly involved or whose acts may be<br />
imputed to the governmental entity in a represented nature about the subject matter <strong>of</strong> the<br />
representation. <strong>The</strong> fundamental principle underlying Rule 4-4.2 entitled,<br />
“communication with persons represented by counsel” commonly known as the “No<br />
Contact Rule” was that a lawyer may not communicate with the represented person<br />
without the consent <strong>of</strong> the other person’s lawyer. <strong>The</strong> stated rationale behind that rule<br />
was to prevent interference with attorney/client relationship and to prevent a lawyer from<br />
persuading a represented person to act or make statements, disclosures or taking a<br />
position contrary to the government’s interest.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Opinion concluded that an attorney must obtain the consent <strong>of</strong> the governmental<br />
lawyer prior to communicating with the governmental <strong>of</strong>ficers, directors or managers, as<br />
well as employees who were directly involved in the matter. <strong>The</strong> bar or prohibition<br />
extends to public <strong>of</strong>ficers or employees whose acts or omissions were imputed to the<br />
agency.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Ethics Opinion cautioned lawyers that communicating directly with governmental<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficers and employees on matters unrelated to specific legal representation must not be<br />
used as a vehicle to evade requirements <strong>of</strong> obtaining consent by “closing eyes to the<br />
obvious”.<br />
19