30.10.2014 Views

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

Reg City Council 6-14-11 minutes.pdf - The City of Titusville, Florida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Matt Barringer believed in the truth and the intent <strong>of</strong> the proposal. In passing the<br />

proposal, he felt the <strong>City</strong> would hit on seven principals <strong>of</strong> government function that<br />

would be helpful to <strong>Titusville</strong>. He commented on support <strong>of</strong> government objectives and<br />

other challenges that faced communities and encouraged <strong>Council</strong> to approve the<br />

NBCEDZ.<br />

Mayor Tulley asked for clarification to the difference between this proposed Economic<br />

Development Zone and the <strong>City</strong>’s CRA.<br />

Planning and Growth Management Director Courtney Barker advised this proposal would<br />

be adopted under a specific statute that required different standards than CRA’s.<br />

William Bender advised he recently became unemployed, was looking for employment,<br />

and expressed it was important to do whatever possible to promote jobs. He was<br />

supportive <strong>of</strong> the NBCEDZ and would assist with this effort anyway he could.<br />

Mayor Tulley closed the public hearing.<br />

Mayor Tulley asked Planning and Growth Management Director Barker to highlight the<br />

rationale behind using new construction for the first five-years and more traditional tax<br />

increment financing (TIF) in succeeding years.<br />

Planning and Growth Management Director Barker highlighted as followed:<br />

• Traditional Tax Increment revenue streams would not provide sufficient (or any)<br />

funding to the NBCEDZ due to falling property values.<br />

• By only including new construction, some funding would be provided by the new<br />

construction tax increment dollars for the first year any new projects were assessed.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> General Fund would receive any increase in value for the project in the<br />

subsequent years.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> <strong>City</strong> would receive some revenue from new construction after the initial year was<br />

provided to the NBCEDZ<br />

Member Long advised she felt <strong>Council</strong> needed a full conceptual plan prior to approval.<br />

She alone had three pages <strong>of</strong> concerns including role and make-up <strong>of</strong> the special district<br />

board members, needing a written agreement with the County clarifying exactly what<br />

role the County and <strong>City</strong> would play and TIF funding.<br />

Planning and Growth Management Director Barker asked Member Long to submit all her<br />

concerns to staff and they would be glad to address them all.<br />

Member Burson would support having a special <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> meeting in order for staff to<br />

address any <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s concerns before making a decision on whether to approve<br />

NBCEDZ. She expressed concern with the appointment <strong>of</strong> the special district board<br />

members.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!