30.10.2014 Views

Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS<br />

this component from the others nearest to it by a ΔR f value of at least 0.15.<br />

In contrast to TLC, fl ash chromatography separations are governed by column<br />

volumes.<br />

A column volume (CV) is defi ned as the volume of solvent required<br />

to fi ll all the adsorbent pores <strong>and</strong> interstitial spaces between adsorbent<br />

particles in a given column. The volume required to elute a compound<br />

of interest from a column is expressed in terms of the number of CV. The<br />

volume that separates the elution of two substances from the same volume<br />

is called column volume difference (ΔCV). The ideal fl ash chromatography<br />

solvent system is one that elutes the desired compound of interest in 3-6<br />

CV <strong>and</strong> that separates this component from others nearest to it by a ΔCV<br />

greater than 1.<br />

The relationship between numbers of CV to R f <strong>for</strong> a given compound<br />

is 1/ R f ; there<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>for</strong> two compounds ΔCV = 1/ R f1 - 1/ R f2. For a<br />

particular set of separation conditions, a weakly retained, fast-eluting component<br />

with an R f =0.9 can be eluted in just over 1 CV, whereas a strongly retained,<br />

slow-eluting component with an R f =0.1 requires 10 CV <strong>for</strong> complete<br />

elution (Table 1).<br />

Table 1: Relationship between R f <strong>and</strong> CV<br />

R f<br />

CV<br />

0.90 1.10<br />

0.70 1.40<br />

0.50 2.00<br />

0.30 3.33<br />

0.10 10.0<br />

Due to factors such as change in the TLC solvent fl ow rate with<br />

respect to time <strong>and</strong> interference from adhesives used to bind TLC sorbents,<br />

solvent conditions that provide an acceptable TLC separation will not necessarily<br />

work effectively <strong>for</strong> fl ash chromatography without modifi cation.<br />

Although some empirical experimentation may be required, the<br />

steps below help streamline the process of converting a TLC solvent system<br />

into a fl ash chromatography mobile phase:<br />

1. Use matching sorbent chemistries on the TLC plate <strong>and</strong> in the<br />

fl ash chromatography column. Stationary phase sorbent chemistries<br />

(including silica) can differ from one manufacturer to another. It is<br />

important to match these sorbent chemistries if the solvent systems<br />

are expected to provide equivalent results.<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!