Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu
from capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu More from this publisher
30.10.2014 Views

11 PROCESS-SCALE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS 11.2.5 Advantages of HPLC The use of HPLC in the isolation and purifi cation of complex compounds is increasing tremendously due to its fl exibility and effi ciency. It has several advantages over traditional methods of isolation and purifi cation: i) Variety of separating techniques. ii) Variety of column packings for different techniques. iii) Separation optimized by alteration of the mobile phase. iv) Mobile phase easily manipulated in gradient systems. v) RP technique separates very similar and very different com- pounds simultaneously. vi) HPLC can be used as a preparative method. vii) HPCL can be used as a purifi cation technique. More than one detector can be connected in series (e.g. UV and evaporative light scattering detector). viii) Most sample analysis is carried out at room temperature. ix) Short analysis runs. More than 70% of HPLC separations are performed on UV detectors and 15% rely on fl uorescence without any derivatization. 11.3 Preparative HPLC Preparative chromatography is the most powerful and versatile method for isolation as well as purifi cation of complex compounds used in drug development studies. Prior to performing preparative HPLC, the following points must be taken into account to optimize the separation and maximize the sample load on a small column: • Prior to pilot-plant scale, a systematic method for development is required • Validated robust analytical methods are required • Scale-up of parameters from analytical method to prep- HPLC • In prep-HPLC, buffer is not used • Stationary phase with large particle sizes to decrease costs for prep-HPLC 11.3.1 Strategy for Preparative Separation Selection of the appropriate mode of chromatography is followed by the optimization of the separation, i.e. stationary phase, mobile phase, temperature, additives. The next step is optimization of the throughput, i.e. sample amount and column overloading. In the fi nal step, stepwise scale-up of separation is performed to obtain the desired compound. 186

EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS It is always important to optimize the small-scale separation (which will signifi cantly impact on throughput), the size of packing material and the column needed to obtain the desired throughput, the mobile solvent and the instrument capability. Normal-phase methods are the fi rst choice because: direct transfer from normal-phase thin-layer LC or HPLC to prep-LC is possible; costs of RP packing materials are still high; cleaning normalphase silica is easier because the material is more robust; removing organic solvents typically used in normal-phase chromatography from the fi nal product solution is easier than removing water from an RP chromatographic fraction and can be achieved at lower temperatures and provides higher product quality and lower energy costs. Particle size of the stationary phase material also plays an important role in the isolation of the desired compounds. The choice of 5-μm particle size in a preparative column is not practical because it not only increases the column pressure but also is extremely expensive. Moreover, when the sample amount is increased, resolution performances of 5-μm and 15-μm particles are not different. 11.4 Practical Consideration in Preparative HPLC Scale-up 11.4.1 Sample Loading If the tests on analytical columns with analytical loadings show good separations, a scale-up to a larger column diameter can be performed on prep-HPLC. Instead of jumping directly to the largest column diameter, stepwise scale-up should be done. The fi rst step in the scale-up process is the transfer of the analytical separation procedure to a 5 cm i.d. preparative LC column. Optimization in a preparative column is required. The sample injected onto the column usually starts at 1 g and increases to as much as 20 g, depending upon the quality (resolution) of the separation achieved, the quality of the initial material, and the specifi cations for the pure product. Start with the 1-g injection, collect fractions and re-analyze them for purity using the analytical method, because with an increase in sample loading there is a decrease in resolution. (A) Scale up factor for column size = (Diameter prep) 2 x Length prep (Diameter anal ) 2 x Length anal (B) Flow rate (prep) = Flow rate (analytical) x (Diameter prep) 2 (Diameter anal ) 2 (C) Gradient duration (prep) = Gradient duration (anal) x = Length anal Length prep 187

EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS<br />

It is always important to optimize the small-scale separation<br />

(which will signifi cantly impact on throughput), the size of packing material<br />

<strong>and</strong> the column needed to obtain the desired throughput, the mobile solvent<br />

<strong>and</strong> the instrument capability. Normal-phase methods are the fi rst choice<br />

because: direct transfer from normal-phase thin-layer LC or HPLC to prep-LC<br />

is possible; costs of RP packing materials are still high; cleaning normalphase<br />

silica is easier because the material is more robust; removing organic<br />

solvents typically used in normal-phase chromatography from the fi nal product<br />

solution is easier than removing water from an RP chromatographic fraction<br />

<strong>and</strong> can be achieved at lower temperatures <strong>and</strong> provides higher product<br />

quality <strong>and</strong> lower energy costs. Particle size of the stationary phase material<br />

also plays an important role in the isolation of the desired compounds. The<br />

choice of 5-μm particle size in a preparative column is not practical because<br />

it not only increases the column pressure but also is extremely expensive.<br />

Moreover, when the sample amount is increased, resolution per<strong>for</strong>mances<br />

of 5-μm <strong>and</strong> 15-μm particles are not different.<br />

11.4 Practical Consideration in Preparative HPLC<br />

Scale-up<br />

11.4.1 Sample Loading<br />

If the tests on analytical columns with analytical loadings show<br />

good separations, a scale-up to a larger column diameter can be per<strong>for</strong>med<br />

on prep-HPLC. Instead of jumping directly to the largest column diameter,<br />

stepwise scale-up should be done. The fi rst step in the scale-up process is<br />

the transfer of the analytical separation procedure to a 5 cm i.d. preparative<br />

LC column. Optimization in a preparative column is required. The sample<br />

injected onto the column usually starts at 1 g <strong>and</strong> increases to as much as<br />

20 g, depending upon the quality (resolution) of the separation achieved,<br />

the quality of the initial material, <strong>and</strong> the specifi cations <strong>for</strong> the pure product.<br />

Start with the 1-g injection, collect fractions <strong>and</strong> re-analyze them <strong>for</strong> purity<br />

using the analytical method, because with an increase in sample loading<br />

there is a decrease in resolution.<br />

(A) Scale up factor <strong>for</strong> column size = (Diameter prep) 2 x Length prep<br />

(Diameter anal ) 2 x Length anal<br />

(B) Flow rate (prep) = Flow rate (analytical) x (Diameter prep) 2<br />

(Diameter anal ) 2<br />

(C) Gradient duration (prep) = Gradient duration (anal) x = Length anal<br />

Length prep<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!