Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev Extraction Technologies for Medicinal and Aromatic ... - Capacity4Dev

capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu
from capacity4dev.ec.europa.eu More from this publisher
30.10.2014 Views

9 SOLID PHASE MICRO-EXTRACTION AND HEADSPACE TRAPPING EXTRACTION Figure 2: Modes of SPME operation: direct extraction (a), headspace trapping (b) and membrane-protected SPME (c) In direct extraction, the coated fi ber is inserted into the sample and the analytes are transported directly from the sample matrix to the extracting phase. To facilitate rapid extraction, some agitation is required to transport the analytes from the bulk of the sample to the vicinity of the fi ber. For gaseous samples, natural fl ow of air (e.g. convection) is usually suffi cient to facilitate rapid equilibrium for volatile analytes. In headspace mode, the analytes are extracted from the gas phase equilibrated with the sample. The primary reason for this modifi cation is to protect the fi ber from the adverse effects caused by non-volatile, high molecular weight substances present in the sample matrix (e.g. human acids or proteins). Here, the amount of an analyte extracted by the fi ber coating does not depend on the location of the fi ber, in the liquid or gas phase; therefore, the sensitivity of headspace trapping is the same as that of direct sampling as long as the volumes of the two phases are the same in both sampling modes. When no headspace is used in direct extraction, a signifi cant sensitivity difference between direct and headspace trapping can occur only for very volatile analytes. However, the choice of sampling mode has a signifi cant impact on the extraction kinetics. When the fi ber is in the headspace, the analytes are removed from the headspace fi rst, followed by indirect extraction from the matrix. In general, the equilibration times for volatile compounds are shorter for headspace SPME than for direct extraction under similar agitation conditions, because of the following reasons: a substantial portion of the analytes is present in the headspace prior to the beginning of the ex- 148

EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS traction process; there is typically a large interface between sample matrix and headspace; and the diffusion coeffi cients in the gas phase are typically higher by four orders of magnitude than in liquids. The concentration of semivolatile compounds in the gaseous phase at room temperature is small, and headspace extraction rates for these compounds are substantially lower. They can be improved by using effi cient agitation or by increasing the extraction temperature. In the third mode (SPME extraction with membrane protection), the fi ber is separated from the sample with a selective membrane, which lets the analytes through while blocking the interferences. The main purpose for the use of the membrane barrier is to protect the fi ber against adverse effects caused by high molecular weight compounds when dirty samples are analyzed. While headspace trapping serves the same purpose, membrane protection enables the analysis of less volatile compounds. Use of thin membranes and an increase in extraction temperature result in shorter extraction times. 9.3 Calibration, Optimization, Precision and Suitability of SPME 9.3.1 Selection of Fiber Coating The chemical nature of the analyte of interest determines the type of coating used. A simple general rule, “like dissolves like”, applies very well for liquid coatings. Selection of the coating is based primarily on the polarity and volatility of the analyte. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is the most useful coating and should be considered fi rst. It is rugged and able to withstand high injector temperatures, up to about 300° C. PDMS is a nonpolar liquid, thus it extracts non-polar analytes very well with a wide linear dynamic range. However, it can also be applied successfully to more polar compounds, particularly after optimizing extraction conditions. Both the coating thickness and the distribution constant determine the sensitivity of the method and the extraction time. Thick coatings offer increased sensitivity, but require much longer equilibration times. As a general rule, to speed up the sampling process, the thinnest coating offering the sensitivity required should be used. 9.3.2 Selection of the Extraction Mode Extraction mode selection is based on the sample matrix composition, analyte volatility, and its affi nity to the matrix. For dirty samples, the headspace or fi ber-protection mode should be selected. For clean matrices, both direct and headspace trapping can be used. The latter is applicable for analytes of medium to high volatility. Headspace trapping is always preferen- 149

EXTRACTION TECHNOLOGIES FOR MEDICINAL AND AROMATIC PLANTS<br />

traction process; there is typically a large interface between sample matrix<br />

<strong>and</strong> headspace; <strong>and</strong> the diffusion coeffi cients in the gas phase are typically<br />

higher by four orders of magnitude than in liquids. The concentration<br />

of semivolatile compounds in the gaseous phase at room temperature is<br />

small, <strong>and</strong> headspace extraction rates <strong>for</strong> these compounds are substantially<br />

lower. They can be improved by using effi cient agitation or by increasing<br />

the extraction temperature.<br />

In the third mode (SPME extraction with membrane protection),<br />

the fi ber is separated from the sample with a selective membrane, which<br />

lets the analytes through while blocking the interferences. The main purpose<br />

<strong>for</strong> the use of the membrane barrier is to protect the fi ber against adverse<br />

effects caused by high molecular weight compounds when dirty samples<br />

are analyzed. While headspace trapping serves the same purpose, membrane<br />

protection enables the analysis of less volatile compounds. Use of<br />

thin membranes <strong>and</strong> an increase in extraction temperature result in shorter<br />

extraction times.<br />

9.3 Calibration, Optimization, Precision <strong>and</strong><br />

Suitability of SPME<br />

9.3.1 Selection of Fiber Coating<br />

The chemical nature of the analyte of interest determines the<br />

type of coating used. A simple general rule, “like dissolves like”, applies<br />

very well <strong>for</strong> liquid coatings. Selection of the coating is based primarily on<br />

the polarity <strong>and</strong> volatility of the analyte. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) is the<br />

most useful coating <strong>and</strong> should be considered fi rst. It is rugged <strong>and</strong> able to<br />

withst<strong>and</strong> high injector temperatures, up to about 300° C. PDMS is a nonpolar<br />

liquid, thus it extracts non-polar analytes very well with a wide linear<br />

dynamic range. However, it can also be applied successfully to more polar<br />

compounds, particularly after optimizing extraction conditions.<br />

Both the coating thickness <strong>and</strong> the distribution constant determine<br />

the sensitivity of the method <strong>and</strong> the extraction time. Thick coatings<br />

offer increased sensitivity, but require much longer equilibration times. As a<br />

general rule, to speed up the sampling process, the thinnest coating offering<br />

the sensitivity required should be used.<br />

9.3.2 Selection of the <strong>Extraction</strong> Mode<br />

<strong>Extraction</strong> mode selection is based on the sample matrix composition,<br />

analyte volatility, <strong>and</strong> its affi nity to the matrix. For dirty samples, the<br />

headspace or fi ber-protection mode should be selected. For clean matrices,<br />

both direct <strong>and</strong> headspace trapping can be used. The latter is applicable <strong>for</strong><br />

analytes of medium to high volatility. Headspace trapping is always preferen-<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!