30.10.2014 Views

southsudan0814_ForUpload

southsudan0814_ForUpload

southsudan0814_ForUpload

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

no opposition forces or other military targets were stationed, sometimes returning several<br />

times to steal, burn and frighten civilians by shooting at them.<br />

Crimes against Humanity<br />

The term “crimes against humanity” includes a range of serious human rights abuses,<br />

including for example murder and torture, committed as part of a widespread or systematic<br />

attack by a government or organization predominantly against a civilian population. 201<br />

“Widespread” refers to the scale of the acts or number of victims. 202 A “systematic” attack<br />

indicates “a pattern or methodical plan.” 203<br />

In Juba, attacks by Dinka forces on Nuer civilians were both widespread and systematic<br />

and could amount to crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch documented<br />

widespread abuses in different parts of Juba, with very similar patterns of attacks, killings,<br />

looting and arrests. The number of security forces involved, and the fact that the abuses<br />

took place at the same time in different places—for example ethnic profiling and attacks<br />

on homes and round-ups of Nuer men in different neighborhoods as well as attacks and<br />

arrests of those who tried to move in Juba on December 16 and 17—suggests organization<br />

and planning. The round ups of Nuer men in the Gudele police compound and nearby<br />

areas on the night of December 15 and all the following day suggests a plan was put in<br />

place. Dinka security forces did not shoot the 200 – 400 men they had gathered in the<br />

Gudele police building until around 8 p.m. and it is unlikely that an act of this magnitude<br />

would have taken place without orders. In at least five cases Nuer captives said that more<br />

senior Dinka soldiers intervened and stopped other soldiers from killing them or others<br />

with them, suggesting there was at least in some places some form of direct command and<br />

control during the crackdown.<br />

201 See Rodney Dixon, “Crimes against humanity,” in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (O.<br />

Triffterer, ed.) (1999), p. 122. This is the standard applied by Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.<br />

South Sudan is not a state party to the Rome Statute and is therefore not bound by it, but the definition in article 7 accords<br />

with the conception of crimes against humanity in customary international law.<br />

202 Akayesu defined widespread as “massive, frequent, large scale action, carried out collectively with considerable<br />

seriousness and directed against a multiplicity of victims,” Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR Trial Chamber, September 2, 1998,<br />

para. 579; see also Kordic and Cerkez, ICTY Trial Chamber, February 26, 2001, para. 179; Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR Trial<br />

Chamber, May 21, 1999, para. 123.<br />

203 Tadic, para. 648. In Kunarac, Kovac and Vokovic, the Appeals Chamber stated that “patterns of crimes— that is the nonaccidental<br />

repetition of similar criminal conduct on a regular basis—are a common expression of [a] systematic occurrence.”<br />

Para. 94.<br />

83 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | AUGUST 2014

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!