southsudan0814_ForUpload
southsudan0814_ForUpload
southsudan0814_ForUpload
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
no opposition forces or other military targets were stationed, sometimes returning several<br />
times to steal, burn and frighten civilians by shooting at them.<br />
Crimes against Humanity<br />
The term “crimes against humanity” includes a range of serious human rights abuses,<br />
including for example murder and torture, committed as part of a widespread or systematic<br />
attack by a government or organization predominantly against a civilian population. 201<br />
“Widespread” refers to the scale of the acts or number of victims. 202 A “systematic” attack<br />
indicates “a pattern or methodical plan.” 203<br />
In Juba, attacks by Dinka forces on Nuer civilians were both widespread and systematic<br />
and could amount to crimes against humanity. Human Rights Watch documented<br />
widespread abuses in different parts of Juba, with very similar patterns of attacks, killings,<br />
looting and arrests. The number of security forces involved, and the fact that the abuses<br />
took place at the same time in different places—for example ethnic profiling and attacks<br />
on homes and round-ups of Nuer men in different neighborhoods as well as attacks and<br />
arrests of those who tried to move in Juba on December 16 and 17—suggests organization<br />
and planning. The round ups of Nuer men in the Gudele police compound and nearby<br />
areas on the night of December 15 and all the following day suggests a plan was put in<br />
place. Dinka security forces did not shoot the 200 – 400 men they had gathered in the<br />
Gudele police building until around 8 p.m. and it is unlikely that an act of this magnitude<br />
would have taken place without orders. In at least five cases Nuer captives said that more<br />
senior Dinka soldiers intervened and stopped other soldiers from killing them or others<br />
with them, suggesting there was at least in some places some form of direct command and<br />
control during the crackdown.<br />
201 See Rodney Dixon, “Crimes against humanity,” in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (O.<br />
Triffterer, ed.) (1999), p. 122. This is the standard applied by Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.<br />
South Sudan is not a state party to the Rome Statute and is therefore not bound by it, but the definition in article 7 accords<br />
with the conception of crimes against humanity in customary international law.<br />
202 Akayesu defined widespread as “massive, frequent, large scale action, carried out collectively with considerable<br />
seriousness and directed against a multiplicity of victims,” Prosecutor v. Akayesu, ICTR Trial Chamber, September 2, 1998,<br />
para. 579; see also Kordic and Cerkez, ICTY Trial Chamber, February 26, 2001, para. 179; Kayishema and Ruzindana, ICTR Trial<br />
Chamber, May 21, 1999, para. 123.<br />
203 Tadic, para. 648. In Kunarac, Kovac and Vokovic, the Appeals Chamber stated that “patterns of crimes— that is the nonaccidental<br />
repetition of similar criminal conduct on a regular basis—are a common expression of [a] systematic occurrence.”<br />
Para. 94.<br />
83 HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH | AUGUST 2014