2012 Budget - South Suburban Parks and Recreation
2012 Budget - South Suburban Parks and Recreation
2012 Budget - South Suburban Parks and Recreation
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>South</strong> <strong>Suburban</strong> Park <strong>and</strong> <strong>Recreation</strong> District<br />
Profile of the District<br />
Long Term Financial Planning<br />
In <strong>2012</strong>, the Finance Department updated the five year financial forecast. These updated<br />
projections were based on historical trends, actual data, <strong>and</strong> certain assumptions for the<br />
future. The plan assumes there are no major catalyst events over the next five years. This<br />
Financial Forecast concluded that the District will have depleted its unreserved cash balance<br />
by 2014, without considering any capital projects out of operations. The forecast also<br />
concluded that if the District cannot increase revenue by adding new programs or increase<br />
fees on existing programs, continue to use Cherry Hills funds (settlement from exclusion<br />
from our District) to help fund maintaining what we have, <strong>and</strong> continue to use the new 2010<br />
1 mill tax for maintenance of parks <strong>and</strong> trails, the District may have to consider cutting<br />
services that our citizens have become accustomed to. The Executive Summary for the<br />
forecast is included in the appendix section of this document.<br />
Currently there are several issues that may affect the long term position of the District. On a<br />
positive note, the 1 Mill open space tax was extended another 10 years by the District’s<br />
voters in May 2010 (approximately $2.4 million per year). The scope of this tax was also<br />
exp<strong>and</strong>ed to include maintenance on <strong>Parks</strong> <strong>and</strong> Trails. The District’s assessed valuation<br />
decreased 6.1% for <strong>2012</strong>, which decreases operating tax revenue $552,000. We anticipate<br />
assessed values to remain effectively the same for 2013. However, Greenwood Village<br />
exclusion will decrease property tax revenue an estimated $300,000 in 2013. The counties<br />
are more than half way through the reassessment evaluation period for tax collections in 2014<br />
<strong>and</strong> 2015. Current property values have not increased significantly, which means tax revenue<br />
may not increase for the next four to six years. District staff is continually evaluating <strong>and</strong><br />
monitoring this <strong>and</strong> other issues that may affect the future of the District.<br />
City of Cherry Hills Village Exclusion<br />
On December 28, 2004 the District Court issued an order directing the exclusion of the City<br />
of Cherry Hills Village (CHV) from the District effective January 1, 2005, subject to certain<br />
conditions. After that date, CHV residents ceased to enjoy resident access <strong>and</strong> fees at<br />
District facilities <strong>and</strong> the District ceased to maintain parks <strong>and</strong> trails in CHV. The Court<br />
ordered CHV to reimburse the District $9,660,838 for physical assets owned by the District<br />
within CHV <strong>and</strong> to compensate the District for economic “harm” created by the exclusion.<br />
CHV was ordered to make principal <strong>and</strong> interest payments of approximately equal amounts,<br />
modified to reflect changes in the interest rate beginning December 1, 2005 (interest only)<br />
<strong>and</strong> ending no later than December 1, 2019. Interest is to be calculated for each payment<br />
based on the interest rate of the two-year U.S. Treasury Note as of November 15 of the<br />
preceding year. CHV residents are to remain liable for the District’s debt service mill levy<br />
applicable to any general obligation debt outst<strong>and</strong>ing or any subsequent refunding of such<br />
debt at the time of exclusion.<br />
20