Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters
Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters
Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
chlorophyl [u~/I) l 8.14- 8.12 IUU~U~ a.ffi- 8.83<br />
m 0.lZ 8.11 8.83 B.82<br />
DAY p 8.11 - 8.89 1 8.82 - 8.88<br />
IZ1<br />
8.U - 8.68<br />
%igure 4 Simnlation produced by DGLWAQ-BLOOM model for day 121, 1976.<br />
Figure 4 &wa <strong>the</strong> result produced by <strong>the</strong> model for day l21 (<strong>the</strong> end of<br />
April) <strong>in</strong> 1976. It <strong>in</strong>dicates tbat <strong>the</strong>re are appreciably fewer algae <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> EIollmds Diep at <strong>the</strong> Volkerak sluice6 than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> river channels<br />
upstream, and thac very high levels of chlorophyl wcur near che<br />
Ear<strong>in</strong>gvliet slgices .<br />
The picture is different: fer 1982 (see Fig. 5). In <strong>the</strong> Bollasds Rdep<br />
<strong>the</strong> chlotuphpl levels are lower than is <strong>the</strong> river ehwnela, but<br />
towards <strong>the</strong> Hafiupliet sluices <strong>the</strong>y decresse even furLher. mia is<br />
fully <strong>in</strong> agreement With <strong>the</strong> picture of measured chloropliyl levels <strong>in</strong><br />
that year.