29.10.2014 Views

Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters

Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters

Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

chlorophyl [u~/I) l 8.14- 8.12 IUU~U~ a.ffi- 8.83<br />

m 0.lZ 8.11 8.83 B.82<br />

DAY p 8.11 - 8.89 1 8.82 - 8.88<br />

IZ1<br />

8.U - 8.68<br />

%igure 4 Simnlation produced by DGLWAQ-BLOOM model for day 121, 1976.<br />

Figure 4 &wa <strong>the</strong> result produced by <strong>the</strong> model for day l21 (<strong>the</strong> end of<br />

April) <strong>in</strong> 1976. It <strong>in</strong>dicates tbat <strong>the</strong>re are appreciably fewer algae <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> EIollmds Diep at <strong>the</strong> Volkerak sluice6 than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> river channels<br />

upstream, and thac very high levels of chlorophyl wcur near che<br />

Ear<strong>in</strong>gvliet slgices .<br />

The picture is different: fer 1982 (see Fig. 5). In <strong>the</strong> Bollasds Rdep<br />

<strong>the</strong> chlotuphpl levels are lower than is <strong>the</strong> river ehwnela, but<br />

towards <strong>the</strong> Hafiupliet sluices <strong>the</strong>y decresse even furLher. mia is<br />

fully <strong>in</strong> agreement With <strong>the</strong> picture of measured chloropliyl levels <strong>in</strong><br />

that year.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!