Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters
Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters Hydro-ecological relations in the Delta Waters
discharged through the mouths of the estuaries to the North However, local variations were apparent, with further erosion taking place in the deeper tidal gullies and corresponding increasas in sedimentatton occurring in the shallows. Moreover, sea-borne sediment was deposited in the western part of the Delta. The finer type of fluvial sediment was only deposited in more sheltered locations, with the majority of it flowing tkouah to the RarM Sea. Under the influence of the prevail* sediment was carried northwerds, where w e 10%-shore current this fine fluvial of it was deposited ia the Wadden Sea, an extensive w e s l area ~ in the north of the Netherlands. Successive closures in the Delta area produced chenges in the flaw distribution, while flow rates tended to decline as a result of the complete or partial loss of tidal motion. =is Led to tde formation of new se-ntation areas witain the Delta regfoil. By 1965 the central section of tXe Delta vaS no longer sublect fa the influence of the Rhine and Ruse. In 1965 and 1969 resptpectively the Grevelingen and Eastern Scheldt estuaries were effectively &coupled from these two rivers. The closure of the Harinmliet estuary in the northern section of the Delta had the effect of reducing tidalmotion over the whale oi? this area. Xn the sautb, the Western Scheldt estuary remained Largely unchanged, although the sand bars in the estuarp *ere dug out in the 1970's to improve the shipping route to Antwerp (Belgium). Finally, in 1987, work in rhe eastern past of the Delta led to the fomation of a separate freshwater lake (Lake Zoom3 in the Eastern Scheldt, irith the spe~ific aCm of imprwing water supplies for agricultural purposes. Lake Zom is being flusked out with frwb water from the Eollarids Diep, The overall eff&t of all these hydraulic engineering projects has been to change significantly the distribution of river water, which has had implications for the transport of fluvial sediment. Recent measurements of the transport of fine fluvial aediments are shown in tern of tons per year in Figure 3. This fi~uze also gives the yearly irccumulation of river sediment at: particular locations. Region I represents the southern lower reaches of the Rhine and the lover reaches of the Meuse. Following the closure of the Haringvliet estuary, flov rates in the
area decltned cnnside~ably, leadins eo a~rensive sedimentation. This has cause3 an Inner delta to form at this location, which is gradnag plovinp in a westerly direction. In the case ef Regien 11, the lIarinpliet, closure has led ko a thin layer of silt being deposited over this area. From 1987 onwards, a new sedimenracion area is developing in Lake Zo& (Region In). The sedimentarion in this region is essentially similar to that found in the Haringqliet area and will mainly cunsist of silt. Pbally, comparisons can be made with the sedhentntion area in the Western Scheldt (Region IVI. In this region most of the silt carried by I l t.l(.rnbsmlsl W.*l.m ..I""" Sm.ldl I I' closure dam J [ waler me.naeernm1 sluice ir~dlmsnlatlon rsgl~n X: number ot lhe raglan 200: sedlmenlallorn in 1000 tons I year Figure 3 Transport rates of fine fluvial sediments 19.87 (values in l000 tms p.a.)
- Page 1 and 2: Netherlands organkation fw applied
- Page 4 and 5: TNO Commlitee on Hydrological Resea
- Page 6 and 7: 2 RIVER WATER AM) THE QPALITH OF TB
- Page 8: B.J.M. Baptist BIJkswaterstaat. Tid
- Page 11 and 12: This approach will put to use what
- Page 13 and 14: Estuaries that have not been influe
- Page 15: 2 CHIWGES XN TEE DELTA The Delta ar
- Page 19 and 20: Plan, then it is apparent tbt the s
- Page 21 and 22: Tiddl flats df the Eastem Seheldt v
- Page 23 and 24: tracefore possible to convert the a
- Page 25 and 26: Figsrlre 7 Changes in the cadrnrum
- Page 27 and 28: prevention measures are desirable h
- Page 29 and 30: elationships between different spec
- Page 31 and 32: Bio-essay Weriments with polluted s
- Page 33 and 34: considerable thought to drawing up
- Page 35 and 36: ShLOUONS, W. and BYSINK, W.D., 1981
- Page 37 and 38: are taken. The first year after the
- Page 39 and 40: The Hollands DiepJnaringpllet is pa
- Page 41 and 42: In 1976 the determination of chlozo
- Page 43 and 44: , 0.66 m 0,s - 0.02 1989 I 0.86 - 0
- Page 45 and 46: Table 3 Eutrophication of the Volke
- Page 47 and 48: Laks Volkarek ---- Lake Zoom 0.40 0
- Page 49 and 50: 4 WAGBEET MEdSIIRaS TO PEEVBT OR LT
- Page 51 and 52: Table 5 gives estimtes of the phosp
- Page 53 and 54: In principle, two states of equilib
- Page 55 and 56: Zooplankton (Alma affinis) Pike (Es
- Page 58 and 59: EUTROPHICATION OF ESTUAAIES AND BRA
- Page 60 and 61: The average discharge of Xhine and
- Page 62 and 63: and only l-2% cows frm the aive Sch
- Page 64 and 65: highest trophic potential: nutrient
discharged through <strong>the</strong> mouths of <strong>the</strong> estuaries to <strong>the</strong> North<br />
However, local variations were apparent, with fur<strong>the</strong>r erosion tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />
place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> deeper tidal gullies and correspond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creasas <strong>in</strong><br />
sedimentatton occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> shallows. Moreover, sea-borne sediment<br />
was deposited <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> western part of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong>. The f<strong>in</strong>er type of<br />
fluvial sediment was only deposited <strong>in</strong> more sheltered locations, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> majority of it flow<strong>in</strong>g tkouah to <strong>the</strong> RarM Sea. Under <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>the</strong> prevail*<br />
sediment was carried northwerds, where w e<br />
10%-shore current this f<strong>in</strong>e fluvial<br />
of it was deposited ia <strong>the</strong><br />
Wadden Sea, an extensive w e s l area ~ <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> north of <strong>the</strong> Ne<strong>the</strong>rlands.<br />
Successive closures <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> area produced chenges <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> flaw<br />
distribution, while flow rates tended to decl<strong>in</strong>e as a result of <strong>the</strong><br />
complete or partial loss of tidal motion. =is Led to tde formation of<br />
new se-ntation<br />
areas wita<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> regfoil. By 1965 <strong>the</strong> central<br />
section of tXe <strong>Delta</strong> vaS no longer sublect fa <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of <strong>the</strong><br />
Rh<strong>in</strong>e and Ruse. In 1965 and 1969 resptpectively <strong>the</strong> Grevel<strong>in</strong>gen and<br />
Eastern Scheldt estuaries were effectively &coupled from <strong>the</strong>se two<br />
rivers. The closure of <strong>the</strong> Har<strong>in</strong>mliet estuary <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn section<br />
of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> had <strong>the</strong> effect of reduc<strong>in</strong>g tidalmotion over <strong>the</strong> whale oi?<br />
this area. Xn <strong>the</strong> sautb, <strong>the</strong> Western Scheldt estuary rema<strong>in</strong>ed Largely<br />
unchanged, although <strong>the</strong> sand bars <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> estuarp *ere dug out <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
1970's to improve <strong>the</strong> shipp<strong>in</strong>g route to Antwerp (Belgium). F<strong>in</strong>ally, <strong>in</strong><br />
1987, work <strong>in</strong> rhe eastern past of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Delta</strong> led to <strong>the</strong> fomation of a<br />
separate freshwater lake (Lake Zoom3 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eastern Scheldt, irith <strong>the</strong><br />
spe~ific aCm of imprw<strong>in</strong>g water supplies for agricultural purposes.<br />
Lake Zom is be<strong>in</strong>g flusked out with frwb water from <strong>the</strong> Eollarids Diep,<br />
The overall eff&t of all <strong>the</strong>se hydraulic eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g projects has been<br />
to change significantly <strong>the</strong> distribution of river water, which has had<br />
implications for <strong>the</strong> transport of fluvial sediment. Recent measurements<br />
of <strong>the</strong> transport of f<strong>in</strong>e fluvial aediments are shown <strong>in</strong> tern of tons<br />
per year <strong>in</strong> Figure 3. This fi~uze also gives <strong>the</strong> yearly irccumulation of<br />
river sediment at: particular locations. Region I represents <strong>the</strong><br />
sou<strong>the</strong>rn lower reaches of <strong>the</strong> Rh<strong>in</strong>e and <strong>the</strong> lover reaches of <strong>the</strong> Meuse.<br />
Follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> closure of <strong>the</strong> Har<strong>in</strong>gvliet estuary, flov rates <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>