29.10.2014 Views

Child Equity Atlas - BIDS

Child Equity Atlas - BIDS

Child Equity Atlas - BIDS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Child</strong> <strong>Equity</strong> <strong>Atlas</strong><br />

5.4.1 In order to assess vulnerability and relative<br />

social deprivation status of households in different<br />

regions of the country, two additional indicators<br />

have been included which combine the indicators<br />

discussed before. The first is the combination of<br />

households without access to sanitary toilet and<br />

without electricity connection, and the second<br />

is households with access to both sanitary toilet<br />

and electricity. This combined household social<br />

deprivation measure shows that overall 43.3 per<br />

cent of households have access to both a sanitary<br />

toilet and electricity connection while 23.6<br />

per cent have access to neither sanitary toilets<br />

nor electricity. There are, however, significant<br />

variations between districts and upazilas with<br />

respect to access to these utilities (see Maps 5.8 to<br />

5.11). The relative status of districts with respect<br />

to these indicators is shown in Tables 5.5 and 5.6,<br />

depicting samples of best and worst performing<br />

districts only.<br />

Table 5.5: Proportion of households having<br />

access to both sanitary toilet and electricity<br />

connection: Best and worst districts,<br />

Bangladesh 2011<br />

Srl. Best districts Worst districts<br />

District % District %<br />

1. Dhaka 91.7 Gaibandha 14.3<br />

2. Narayanganj 76.3 Thakurgaon 14.9<br />

3. Munshiganj 76.2 Kurigram 15.2<br />

4. Gazipur 72.9 Lalmonirhat 15.4<br />

5. Chittagong 66.4 Bandarban 16.4<br />

Bangladesh: 43.3%<br />

Table 5.6: Proportion of households having<br />

no access to sanitary toilet and electricity<br />

connection: Best and worst districts,<br />

Bangladesh 2011<br />

Srl. Best districts Worst districts<br />

District % District %<br />

1. Dhaka 1.2 Bandarban 61.6<br />

2. Narayanganj 2.9 Gaibandha 54.4<br />

3. Munshiganj 4.4 Thakurgaon 52.5<br />

4. Gazipur 7.5 Sunamganj 52.1<br />

5. Comilla 8.5 Khagrachhari 50.8<br />

Bangladesh: 23.6%<br />

5.4.2 The performance of Bangladesh in some<br />

of these indicators on utilities and household<br />

facilities in this chapter should be viewed from<br />

many perspectives. While successive Governments<br />

continue to prioritize infrastructural development<br />

plus social investments, social movements, UN<br />

Agencies, donors, civil society and communities have<br />

made meaningful contributions in promoting the use<br />

of toilets, and reduced open defecation remarkably.<br />

According to WHO/UNICEF JMP (2012 22 ), 56 per<br />

cent of the population of Bangladesh has access<br />

to improved sanitation facilities, with remarkable<br />

reduction in open defecation to four per cent–<br />

successes attributable to multiple partnerships,<br />

Government leadership and community ownership<br />

of social development, including children engaged<br />

in whistle blowing and other aspects of Community<br />

Led Total Sanitation (CLTS). This chapter of the <strong>Equity</strong><br />

<strong>Atlas</strong> points the way forward to the pockets of<br />

persisting locations where further work is required<br />

in Bangladesh, to ensure equity in the pursuit of<br />

socioeconomic rights of children and women.<br />

22<br />

WHO/UNICEF 2012, Progress on Drinking Water and<br />

Sanitation: 2012 Update.http://www.unicef.org/media/files/<br />

JMPreport2012.pdf<br />

Photo : Ibrahim Khan Moni<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!