Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Introduction<br />
social deprivation and usable for multi-sector<br />
social targeting of the most deprived upazilas<br />
as it represents the education, housing, child<br />
protection and water and sanitation sectors. The<br />
index captures social deprivation poverty and<br />
the results of the index can easily be used and<br />
understood. The higher the CDI number the worse<br />
the situation and, therefore, the more efforts to<br />
be invested to achieve Millennium Development<br />
Goals (MDGs), focusing on the most deprived<br />
populations.<br />
1.5.7 The upazila map with its greater geographic<br />
resolution, features patterns of performance and<br />
glaring “worst performing” areas or disparities,<br />
often obscured by national and “district averages”.<br />
Thus 90 “high deprivation” upazilas were identified.<br />
This combined with the 50 “highest deprivation”<br />
upazilas, adds up to 140 upazilas (29 per cent of<br />
all upazilas) being recognized as “most deprived”<br />
upazilas.<br />
1.5.8 The important thing about the 2011 Census,<br />
when analyzed from the children’s socioeconomic<br />
rights equity lens, is that it shows Bangladesh is<br />
homogeneous but home to more challenging<br />
disparities than thought. The robust census data<br />
at the upazila and ward level shows the disparities,<br />
especially within urban districts or districts with<br />
isolated areas. The composite deprivation index<br />
helps to focus on the most deprived areas. For<br />
instance, the areas with the highest deprivation<br />
tend to be both the least and most (urban slums)<br />
densely populated areas. Combining the map<br />
results and statistical analysis, we can conclude<br />
that among the 50 highest deprivation upazilas,<br />
only one has an above average progress in<br />
literacy reduction and that these have been the<br />
low performing areas for a long time (stagnant<br />
areas are the hard core), most of them being<br />
geographically remote areas, and have lowest<br />
population densities.<br />
1.5.9 The analysis reveals that more than good<br />
governance, remoteness seems to be the big<br />
driver of social stagnation. Thus, efforts to reach<br />
and open up these areas should be increased, as<br />
stated in the Sixth Five Year Plan 2011-2015.<br />
1.6 Structure of the Report<br />
1.6.1 The report is structured as follows. After<br />
the introductory chapter, chapter two discusses<br />
the population distribution and demographic<br />
situation in the country. Literacy, school<br />
attendance and educational attainment are<br />
discussed in chapter three. The issues of child<br />
worker and spatial distribution are presented in<br />
chapter four. Chapter five is on housing, access<br />
to sanitary toilet and electricity. The situation in<br />
Dhaka City Corporation, also a proxy for urban<br />
area, has been presented in chapter six. Chapter<br />
seven presents the pockets of social deprivation,<br />
and finally the summary and conclusion of the<br />
report is presented in chapter eight.<br />
Presentation of Data/Findings<br />
1.6.2 As mentioned earlier, the report has used<br />
the 2011 census data quite extensively. Results<br />
obtained from the analyses are presented in<br />
several stages using tables, graphs, and maps by<br />
gender, area (rural-urban), division, district, upazila<br />
and wards of Dhaka City Corporation. Indicators<br />
used in the report along with their definition and<br />
computation are given in Annex 1A through 1C<br />
respectively. Presentation of results is made as in<br />
the follow order:<br />
(i) Graphs have been prepared for some of the<br />
selected indicators by gender, rural-urban<br />
and/or division and presented alongside<br />
7