Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Child Equity Atlas - BIDS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pockets of Social Deprivation<br />
7.1.4 The composite deprivation index (CDI)<br />
created is strongly related to poverty from<br />
the perspective of social deprivation, and it<br />
can, therefore, be used for multi-sector social<br />
targeting of the most deprived upazilas,<br />
deprived in terms of education, housing, child<br />
protection and sanitation. The index captures<br />
social deprivation and the results of the index<br />
can easily be used and understood: the higher<br />
the number of areas with higher values of<br />
index, the worse the situation and the more<br />
that has to be done to achieve the MDGs with<br />
equity in Bangladesh.<br />
7.2 Emerging Patterns and Pockets of Social<br />
Deprivation<br />
7.2.1 The district level Map shows an<br />
interesting pattern: with a few exceptions,<br />
the whole western and southern parts of<br />
the country fall within the ‘good’ category,<br />
while the northern and eastern parts fall in<br />
the more deprived regions. Thus, the Map<br />
reveals continuous spots of the same colour<br />
rather than a patch work of different colours<br />
(categories). The best performing districts are<br />
located around Khulna and Barisal divisions,<br />
compared to Sylhet division which visibly lags<br />
behind.<br />
7.2.2 The upazila Map with its much greater<br />
geographic resolution features many other<br />
poorly performing areas indicating disparities<br />
within districts and between upazilas, which<br />
were obscured by district averages in the district<br />
Map. Overall district performance is often a<br />
combination of ‘good’ and ‘poor’ performance<br />
at the upazila level. Data Mapping at lower<br />
administrative levels, upazila at district and<br />
ward at DCC, allows us to recognize important<br />
patterns and pockets of social deprivations<br />
for collective action to address social<br />
inequalities or exclusion. Thus, the number of<br />
“high deprivation” and “highest deprivation”<br />
upazilas were 90 and 50, respectively. These<br />
two categories, together 140 upazilas, were<br />
recognized as the “most deprived”, providing<br />
decision makers with a chance to target social<br />
development programmes and budgets<br />
more directly to these areas lagging behind<br />
as Bangladesh seeks to attain middle income<br />
status with equity by 2021.<br />
7.2.3 The robust census data at the upazila<br />
and ward levels show significant disparities<br />
between different upazilas within and outside<br />
districts, and between different wards of DCC.<br />
Deprivation is particularly higher in wards with<br />
high proportion of slums and the upazilas of<br />
isolated districts. The CDI helps to focus on the<br />
most deprived areas.<br />
7.2.4 Table 7.3 presents the number of<br />
deprived upazilas in each of the 15 most<br />
deprived districts based on CDI. The table<br />
shows two districts - Sunamganj and Bhola - as<br />
the most deprived districts, as all the upazilas<br />
of these districts were the ‘most deprived’.<br />
The 15 districts presented in the table contain<br />
91 out of 140 most deprived upazilas in 64<br />
districts, a very substantial proportion. The<br />
observed pattern shows that deprivation is<br />
more widespread than the deprived districts<br />
indicate. As revealed, there are many pockets<br />
of poverty in Bangladesh, even in economically<br />
well-off areas too. For example, Gulshan,<br />
though one of the wealthiest areas in Dhaka<br />
city has a few pockets of poverty gauged by<br />
social deprivation measures.<br />
109