29.10.2014 Views

exenatide for type 2 diabetes

exenatide for type 2 diabetes

exenatide for type 2 diabetes

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

בכתב ©<br />

העורך:‏ ד"ר פיליפ סאקס<br />

דוא"ל<br />

להפצה:‏ טל'‏<br />

אין להעתיק או לפרסם בכל דרך שהיא את הביטאון או חלקים ממנו בלא הרשאה<br />

saxp@netvision.net.il<br />

ה<br />

P H A R x M A<br />

,02-6781515<br />

מ ר א פ<br />

הביטאון לענייני<br />

תרופות ותראפיה<br />

ISRAEL DRUG BULLETIN<br />

כרך 14, ביטאון מס'‏ 81<br />

לשימוש רציונאלי בתרופות<br />

אמינה ובלתי ובלתי-תלויה<br />

סקירה<br />

תשרי-חשוון תשס"ח,‏ אוקטובר-נובמבר 2007<br />

עוד בביטאון:‏ Sitagliptin <strong>for</strong> Type 2 Diabetes<br />

חדש בביטאון:‏ בדיקת מחירי תרופות חדשות בארץ ובחו"ל<br />

............................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................<br />

EXENATIDE FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES<br />

אקסנטיד,‏ הראשונה בקבוצת תרופות חדשה,‏ מאושרת לטיפול בסוכרת סוג בשילוב עם מטפורמין ו/או<br />

סולפונילאוריאה בחולים ללא שליטה גליקמית הולמת במינון המירבי הנסבל של תרופות פומיות אלה.‏<br />

הוספת זריקות אקסנטיד לטיפול הפומי יכולה לשפר את השליטה הגליקמית בצום ולאחר ארוחות,‏ וללא עלייה<br />

במשקל.‏ עם זאת,‏ יעילותה ובטיחותה בטווח הארוך אינן ידועות.‏<br />

בחילה היא תופעת לוואי שכיחה;‏ היפוגליקמיה עשויה לקרות,‏ במיוחד בחולים הנוטלים גם סולפונילאוריאה.‏<br />

במחקרים השוואתיים לא סמויים,‏ טיפול באקסנטיד,‏ אינסולין גלרגין או אינסולין דו-פאסי אספארט השיגו<br />

שיפורים דומים בשליטה הגליקמית;‏ מינוני האינסולין במחקרים אלה היו נמוכים.‏<br />

• האם העדר עלייה במשקל הינו סיבה טובה דייה לנסות אקסנטיד לפני שמתחילים טיפול באינסולין דורש הבהרה.‏<br />

In response to food, several peptide hormones<br />

(incretins) are released from cells in the gastrointestinal<br />

tract. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is one of these; it<br />

acts on pancreatic beta-cells to potentiate insulin<br />

secretion stimulated by glucose. 1 Exenatide, a<br />

synthetic peptide, is a GLP-1 agonist and the first of a<br />

new class known as incretin mimetics. It potentiates<br />

insulin secretion, inhibits secretion of glucagon, slows<br />

gastric emptying and reduces food intake due to<br />

decreased appetite and increased satiety. Animal<br />

studies have shown increased growth of pancreatic<br />

beta-cells in response to treatment with <strong>exenatide</strong>;<br />

whether this occurs in patients with <strong>diabetes</strong> remains to<br />

be determined. 2<br />

Exenatide injection (Byetta; Eli Lilly) has been<br />

approved by the Israel Ministry of Health <strong>for</strong> the<br />

treatment of <strong>type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong> mellitus in combination<br />

with met<strong>for</strong>min and/or sulphonylureas in patients who<br />

have not achieved adequate glycaemic control on<br />

maximally tolerated doses of these oral therapies.<br />

EVIDENCE OF CLINICAL EFFICACY<br />

The efficacy of <strong>exenatide</strong> has been assessed in<br />

placebo-controlled trials and open-label comparator<br />

studies. Six such trials enrolled patients with <strong>type</strong> 2<br />

<strong>diabetes</strong> with HbA 1c levels of 7.1% to 11%; only<br />

patients with a BMI >25kg/m 2 were included. The<br />

studies investigated the efficacy of the addition of<br />

<strong>exenatide</strong> 5 or 10mcg twice daily to existing oral<br />

hypoglycaemic therapy in adults with <strong>type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong><br />

uncontrolled by maximally effective doses of met<strong>for</strong>min<br />

2<br />

(>1500mg daily) and/or a sulphonylurea. Oral therapy<br />

was continued at the baseline dose, though the dose of<br />

sulphonylureas could be adjusted if hypoglycaemia<br />

occurred. In all studies the primary endpoint was the<br />

change from baseline in % glycated haemoglobin<br />

(HbA 1c) in an intention-to-treat cohort. Secondary<br />

endpoints included the proportion of patients with HbA 1c<br />

>7% at baseline who achieved HbA 1c


A total of 974 patients who had completed one of<br />

the above studies enrolled in an open-label extension<br />

study during which all patients received <strong>exenatide</strong><br />

10mcg twice daily. 6 Of the patients who completed two<br />

years of <strong>exenatide</strong> treatment, the reduction in HbA 1c<br />

was maintained and weight loss continued. However,<br />

the withdrawal rate was high and only 283 patients<br />

completed two years of <strong>exenatide</strong> treatment.<br />

In two of the above trials <strong>exenatide</strong> was added to<br />

oral monotherapy. 3,4 However, it is more likely that in<br />

clinical practice <strong>exenatide</strong> will be added to treatment<br />

once combination therapy with two (and possibly three)<br />

oral hypoglycaemics has failed.<br />

A 16-week placebo-controlled RCT in 233 patients<br />

with <strong>type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong> on glitazone treatment with or<br />

without met<strong>for</strong>min found <strong>exenatide</strong> 10mcg twice daily<br />

reduced HbA 1c levels to a greater extent than placebo (-<br />

0.9% vs +0.1%; p25kg/m 2 and were on<br />

combination therapy with met<strong>for</strong>min and a<br />

sulphonylurea.<br />

The change in HbA 1c in the <strong>exenatide</strong> group was<br />

found to be non-inferior to that in the insulin glargine<br />

group (both -1.1%) and the biphasic insulin aspart<br />

group (-1.0% vs. -0.9%). In order to prove clinical noninferiority<br />

to insulin, it must be proven that insulin<br />

treated subjects had maximally tolerated doses of<br />

insulin. 10 This is doubtful and that, based on the nonblinded<br />

nature of these studies, a potential bias towards<br />

lower doses of insulin cannot be fully excluded, even<br />

though an attempt to minimise this bias was made. The<br />

proportion of patients achieving the target HbA 1c was<br />

46% <strong>for</strong> <strong>exenatide</strong> compared with 48% <strong>for</strong> insulin<br />

glargine, and 32% <strong>for</strong> <strong>exenatide</strong> and 24% with biphasic<br />

insulin aspart. Patients treated with <strong>exenatide</strong> lost<br />

bodyweight (2.3 to 2.5kg) whereas patients treated with<br />

insulin glargine or biphasic insulin aspart gained<br />

bodyweight.<br />

ADVERSE EFFECTS<br />

The main adverse effects of <strong>exenatide</strong> are nausea,<br />

vomiting, diarrhoea, and hypoglycaemia. In comparator<br />

studies, the incidence of nausea ranged from 33% to<br />

57% in <strong>exenatide</strong> groups compared with 0.4% to 9% in<br />

patients treated with insulin analogues; <strong>for</strong> vomiting the<br />

equivalent rates were 9% to 17% and 2.4% to 4%<br />

respectively. Most episodes of nausea were mild to<br />

moderate, dose-related, and decreased in frequency<br />

with continued treatment. There have been reports of<br />

pancreatitis in postmarketing surveillance data. 10,11<br />

The incidence of hypoglycaemia with <strong>exenatide</strong><br />

increased when used in combination with a<br />

sulphonylurea, but not met<strong>for</strong>min. A reduction in the<br />

sulphonylurea dose should be considered when giving<br />

in combination with <strong>exenatide</strong> and blood glucose<br />

monitoring may become necessary. In comparator<br />

studies, the incidence of hypoglycaemia was<br />

comparable in <strong>exenatide</strong>– and insulin-treated groups.<br />

Some patients developed anti-<strong>exenatide</strong> antibodies,<br />

which did not increase the incidence of any adverse<br />

effects, but in a few patients appeared to attenuate the<br />

anti-hyperglycaemic effect of the drug.<br />

More <strong>exenatide</strong>-treated patients withdrew from the<br />

studies because of adverse events compared with<br />

patients treated with insulin glargine 9 (10% vs 1%) or<br />

biphasic insulin aspart (8% vs 0%). 8 In pregnant<br />

animals, <strong>exenatide</strong> at 3 times the human dose had<br />

adverse effects on the foetus, including reduced growth,<br />

skeletal abnormalities and teratogenic effects. It should<br />

not be used during pregnancy.<br />

Drug interactions: Because the drug slows gastric<br />

emptying, <strong>exenatide</strong> may reduce the extent and rate of<br />

absorption of some oral medicines. Patients receiving<br />

oral medicines with a narrow therapeutic range or those<br />

requiring careful monitoring should be followed closely.<br />

Oral medicines dependent on threshold concentrations,<br />

e.g. contraceptives or antibiotics, should be taken at<br />

least one hour be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>exenatide</strong>. Increased INR has<br />

been reported during concomitant use with warfarin.<br />

DOSAGE AND COSTS<br />

Therapy should be initiated at 5mcg twice daily <strong>for</strong><br />

at least one month to improve tolerability, then<br />

increased to 10mcg twice daily to further improve<br />

glycaemic control. Doses should be administered<br />

subcutaneously in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm at<br />

any time within one hour be<strong>for</strong>e the morning and<br />

evening meals (or two main meals approximately 6<br />

hours or more apart) and should not be administered<br />

after a meal. Exenatide is not recommended <strong>for</strong><br />

patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl


Cost of Exenatide and Insulins<br />

Drug Dose 1 Cost (NIS) 2<br />

Exenatide (Byetta) 5-10mcg twice 805<br />

daily<br />

Isophane insulin 25-50U daily 112-223<br />

(Humulin 30/70 /<br />

Insulatard)<br />

Biphasic insulin aspart 25-50U daily 156-312<br />

(Novomix 30)<br />

Insulin glargine (Lantus) 25-50U daily 217-434<br />

Insulin detemir (Levemir) 25-50U daily 223-447<br />

1<br />

Doses are <strong>for</strong> general comparison only and do not imply therapeutic<br />

equivalence.<br />

2<br />

30 days; cartridge costs at retail price.<br />

International cost comparison (monthly cost at.<br />

price to retail pharmacy): Israel NIS 593; UK NIS 560<br />

(₤1 = NIS 8.2), <strong>for</strong> both strengths. In the USA: NIS 588<br />

(1.2ml pen), NIS 690 (2.4ml pen) (USD = NIS 4.0).<br />

Comparing prices in Israel with drug prices in the UK<br />

and USA is instructive, as prices in these countries are<br />

usually higher than elsewhere. Furthermore, the UK<br />

and USA are much higher income countries than Israel,<br />

meaning they are better able to fund the cost of new<br />

drugs.<br />

CONCLUSION<br />

Adding twice daily injections of <strong>exenatide</strong> to oral<br />

therapy was seen to reduce HbA 1c levels to a greater<br />

extent than placebo. Non-blinded comparator studies<br />

found <strong>exenatide</strong> to be non-inferior to insulin glargine or<br />

biphasic insulin aspart in reducing HbA 1c levels;<br />

however, insulin doses in these studies were low.<br />

Nausea is common, and hypoglycaemia can occur,<br />

particularly in patients also taking a sulphonylurea.<br />

There are no data on the effects of <strong>exenatide</strong> on<br />

mortality or morbidity outcomes. Further long-term data<br />

are needed to establish safety and if short-term<br />

improvements in HbA 1c are sustained. Weight loss with<br />

<strong>exenatide</strong>, which appears to be directly proportional to<br />

baseline BMI is an important advantage over insulin in<br />

overweight patients. Whether the absence of weight<br />

gain is reason enough to try it be<strong>for</strong>e starting insulin<br />

remains to be seen. It has no advantage over insulin in<br />

terms of the number of daily injections required.<br />

The dose of <strong>exenatide</strong> does not need to be adjusted<br />

on a day to day basis. However, blood glucose<br />

monitoring may still be necessary to adjust the dose of<br />

sulphonylureas.<br />

References<br />

1. Davidson M et al, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 4:713,<br />

2005.<br />

2. Joy S et al, Ann Pharmacother 39:110, 2005.<br />

3. De Fronzo R et al, Diabetes Care 28:1092, 2005.<br />

4. Buse J et al, Diabetes Care 27:2628, 2004.<br />

5. Kendall D et al, Diabetes Care 28:1083, 2005.<br />

6. Buse J et al, Clin Ther 29:139, 2007.<br />

7. Zinman B et al, Ann Intern Med 146:477, 2007<br />

8. Nauck M et al, Diabetologia 50:259, 2007.<br />

9. Heine R et al, Ann Intern Med 143:559, 2005.<br />

10. European public assessment report (Byetta), December<br />

2006.<br />

11. www.fda.gov/cder/drug/In<strong>for</strong>sheets/HCP/<strong>exenatide</strong>HCP,<br />

16.10.07.<br />

............................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................<br />

SITAGLIPTIN FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES<br />

נראה שסיטאגליפטין,‏ הראשונה בקבוצת תרופות חדשה לטיפול בסוכרת סוג הינה בעלת יעילות בינונית הן<br />

בטיפול יחיד והן בשילוב עם תרופות אנטי סוכרתיות אחרות.‏<br />

עד היום לא נצפה קשר לעלייה במשקל או להיפוגליקמיה.‏ ואולם,‏ הניסיון הקליני עם סיטגליפטין מוגבל ובטיחותה<br />

ארוכת הטווח אינה ידועה.‏<br />

יעילותה של סיטאגליפטין בהשוואה לתרופות ותיקות יותר עדיין דורשת ביסוס.‏ נראה כי מטפורמין<br />

וסולפונילאוריאה יעילות יותר בהורדת רמות HbA 1c בטווח הקצר והן זולות בהרבה.‏<br />

סיטאגליפטון נמצאת בהליכי רישום במשרד הבריאות.‏<br />

,2<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

•<br />

Sitagliptin (Januvia; MSD) is the first of a new class<br />

of oral antidiabetic agents known as dipeptidyl<br />

peptidase <strong>type</strong> 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. They enhance the<br />

levels of active incretin hormones (including glucagonlike<br />

peptide-1 [GLP-1]), which are released by the<br />

intestine steadily throughout the day and are increased<br />

in response to a meal. Incretin hormones enhance<br />

insulin secretion, reduce glucagon secretion, and so<br />

reduce blood glucose levels. However, they are rapidly<br />

inactivated by the DPP-4 enzyme. DPP-4 inhibitors help<br />

to prevent this inactivation. 1<br />

Sitagliptin has been approved in the EU and USA in<br />

combination with met<strong>for</strong>min or thiazolidinediones, such<br />

as rosiglitazone, when monotherapy with these agents<br />

does not provide adequate glycaemic control. In the<br />

USA it is also licensed <strong>for</strong> use in combination with<br />

sulphonylurea or as part of a triple therapy regimen. It<br />

has also been approved as monotherapy in the USA.<br />

Here we assess sitagliptin's efficacy as monotherapy<br />

and as part of combination therapy.<br />

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

81 ,14 אוקטובר-נובמבר 2007<br />

3<br />

פארמה,‏ כרך<br />

ביטאון מס'‏


Pharmacokinetics: Sitagliptin is rapidly absorbed;<br />

plasma concentrations reach a peak 1-4 hours after<br />

ingestion. A single 100mg dose inhibits DPP-4 activity<br />

over a 24-hour period and increases glucose- or mealstimulated<br />

plasma GLP-1 and glucose-dependent<br />

insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) levels about 2- to 3-<br />

fold. 2<br />

EVIDENCE OF CLINICAL EFFICACY<br />

Monotherapy<br />

In two double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 18<br />

weeks' (n=521) and 24 weeks' (n=741) duration in<br />

patients with <strong>type</strong> 2 <strong>diabetes</strong> not controlled by diet and<br />

exercise, sitagliptin 100mg once daily was associated<br />

with reductions in HbA 1c of 0.48% and 0.61% from<br />

baseline, compared to an increase of 0.12% and 0.18%<br />

with placebo. 3,4 These decreases in HbA 1c are less than<br />

those generally expected with met<strong>for</strong>min (1.5%),<br />

sulfonylureas (1.5%) or thiazolidinediones (0.5%-<br />

1.4%). 5 Significantly (p


ADVERSE EFFECTS<br />

Adverse events reported in the trials included<br />

nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, abdominal pain<br />

and headache. 6-9 One concern is that many other peptides<br />

besides the incretin hormones, including neuropeptides,<br />

cytokines and chemokines, are metabolised by the<br />

relatively nonspecific DPP-4 enzyme. 11 Whether inhibiting<br />

this activity could have untoward effects is unknown. 12<br />

There are no published safety data beyond 52 weeks <strong>for</strong><br />

sitagliptin.<br />

Safety data <strong>for</strong> sitagliptin used in combination therapy<br />

suggest that the overall incidence of gastrointestinal<br />

adverse events was similar to placebo 6 and glipizide 8<br />

when added to ongoing met<strong>for</strong>min, but higher than<br />

placebo (13.7% vs 6.2%) when added to ongoing<br />

pioglitazone. 9 The addition of sitagliptin to met<strong>for</strong>min or<br />

pioglitazone did not significantly increase the incidence of<br />

hypoglycaemia vs placebo, 6,9 and fewer patients reported<br />

hypoglycaemic episodes (of any severity) with sitagliptin<br />

(4.9%) vs glipizide (32.0%, p

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!