29.10.2014 Views

Understanding the fundamental parameters of millisecond pulsars ...

Understanding the fundamental parameters of millisecond pulsars ...

Understanding the fundamental parameters of millisecond pulsars ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Understanding</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>fundamental</strong><br />

<strong>parameters</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>millisecond</strong> <strong>pulsars</strong><br />

through high energy<br />

observations and<br />

modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

X-ray lightcurve<br />

Benoit Pancrazi<br />

CESR–Toulouse<br />

benoit.pancrazi@cesr.fr<br />

Barcelona, April 12, 2010


Generalities <strong>of</strong> <strong>millisecond</strong> <strong>pulsars</strong> . . .<br />

◮ Acceleration during accretion<br />

phase.<br />

◮ NS is spun up to ms periods<br />

⇒ ”recycled”.<br />

◮ Old <strong>pulsars</strong> (τ c ∼ 10 9 yrs).<br />

◮ Low surface magnetic fields<br />

(B s ∼ 10 7 − 10 9 G).<br />

◮ Emission from radio to γ-rays.<br />

Fundamental questions<br />

◮ Location <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> emission regions.<br />

◮ Radiation mechanisms at <strong>the</strong> origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> HE emission.<br />

◮ Equation <strong>of</strong> state <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NS matter.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 2 / 12


High energy models<br />

Open field line region<br />

◮ E ⃗ · ⃗B ≠ 0<br />

◮ ρ ≠ ρ GJ<br />

⇒ ACCELERATION<br />

3 Models<br />

Corotating magnetosphere<br />

◮ E ⃗ · ⃗B = 0<br />

◮ ρ = ρ GJ<br />

◮ Polar Cap : (unscreened<br />

?) E ‖ , ICS, synchrotron.<br />

◮ Slot Gap : extended,<br />

along last open field line,<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-pulse emission.<br />

◮ Outer Gap : high altitude,<br />

CR, Vela/Crab type, no<br />

<strong>of</strong>f-pulse.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 3 / 12


X-ray and radio emission<br />

X-ray emission<br />

(Zhang & Cheng 2003)<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

Thermal : heating <strong>of</strong> PC.<br />

Non-<strong>the</strong>rmal : synchrotron at high altitude.<br />

Radio : unknown mechanism<br />

⇒ empirical model.<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

Core beam centred on <strong>the</strong> PC.<br />

Surrounding cone beams.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 4 / 12


Multiwavelength observations<br />

γ-rays : Fermi LAT.<br />

X-rays : XMM-Newton.<br />

◮ 100 MeV - 300 GeV<br />

◮ 200 eV - 15 keV<br />

◮ Timing resolution < 1 µs<br />

◮ Timing resolution ∼ 30 µs<br />

Radio : Nançay & Parkes.<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

Radio pulse pr<strong>of</strong>ile.<br />

Ephemerides<br />

⇒ ABSOLUTE PULSE PROFILES (TEMPO2)<br />

⇓<br />

COMPARISON OF PHASE SHIFTS<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 5 / 12


PSR J0613-0200 / timing analysis<br />

> 5.5 σ<br />

2.2 σ<br />

γ-ray pulse pr<strong>of</strong>ile<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

Modelling ⇒ SG/OG<br />

(Venter at al. 2009).<br />

Small precursor with<br />

extended dataset ⇒ SG ?<br />

X-rays & radio<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

No significant<br />

pulsation in X-rays.<br />

X-ray fluctuation &<br />

radio peak aligned<br />

& <strong>of</strong> similar widths.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 6 / 12


PSR J0613-0200 / spectral analysis<br />

Thermal component<br />

◮ Heated PC ?<br />

Non-<strong>the</strong>rmal<br />

component<br />

◮<br />

◮<br />

Use <strong>of</strong> γ-ray fitting<br />

<strong>parameters</strong> :<br />

Γ = 1.4 ± 0.3,<br />

E c = 2.6 +1.0<br />

−0.6 GeV.<br />

Synchrotron at high<br />

altitude ?<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 7 / 12


PSR J1911-1114<br />

2.5 σ<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal emission ?<br />

◮ No significant pulsation in X-rays.<br />

◮ X-ray fluctuation & radio peak aligned & <strong>of</strong> similar widths.<br />

◮ Possible <strong>the</strong>rmal component in <strong>the</strong> spectrum.<br />

◮ Thermal emission coming from heated PC ?<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 8 / 12


PSR J2129-5721<br />

2.3 σ<br />

Evidence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal emission ?<br />

◮ No significant pulsation in X-rays.<br />

◮ X-ray fluctuation & radio peak aligned & <strong>of</strong> similar widths.<br />

◮ Possible <strong>the</strong>rmal component in <strong>the</strong> spectrum (contaminating source).<br />

◮ Thermal emission coming from heated PC ?<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 9 / 12


PSR J1853+1303 & PSR J1600-3053<br />

1.6 σ<br />

1.8 σ<br />

No source visible in <strong>the</strong> MOS data<br />

◮ No significant pulsation in X-rays.<br />

◮ Possible alignment for PSR J853+1303.<br />

◮ Possible misalignment for PSR J1600-3053.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 10 / 12


Modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>rmal X-rays from MSPs<br />

Thermal emission coming from a heated PC on a weakly magnetised NS<br />

covered by a H atmosphere (Bogdanov et al. 2007).<br />

◮<br />

Relativistic effects (light bending, aberration, Doppler boosting, time delays).<br />

◮ Many <strong>parameters</strong> : M, R, freq, i, θ . . .<br />

⇒ Reduce <strong>the</strong> number <strong>of</strong> free <strong>parameters</strong> (Venter et al. 2009).<br />

⇒ Account for <strong>the</strong> oblateness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> NS (Morsink et al. 2007).<br />

⇒<br />

Tighter constraints on M/R.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 11 / 12


Summary & Prospects<br />

5 multiwavelength observations <strong>of</strong> MSPs<br />

(Pancrazi et al. 2010, submitted).<br />

◮ No significant X-ray detection <strong>of</strong> pulsations<br />

◮ (4 MSPs show an X-ray fluctuation aligned with<br />

<strong>the</strong> radio peak).<br />

Work in progress :<br />

◮ Modelling <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> X-ray lightcurve → EoS.<br />

◮ Improvements + combination <strong>of</strong> X-rays & γ-rays<br />

→ tighter constraints.<br />

◮ Search for MSPs emitting in X-rays (<strong>the</strong>rmal) &<br />

in γ-rays.<br />

Benoit Pancrazi (CESR) Barcelona, April 12, 2010 12 / 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!